More evidence of why the ONLY remedy is to enforce The Plan against the N.W.O. Elite traitors and reinstate God's Perfect Laws of Liberty:-
http://i.am/jah/plan.htm

Whilst there's still time:-
http://i.am/jah/signs.htm

By Matt Hutaff
Jul 12, 2004


I could barely contain my yawn when I heard Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge claim last Thursday that there was yet another vague, shapeless attack on America looming over the horizon.

It's hard to feign shock at this point, after all. These stupid sound bites always manage to squirm their way into the press when the Bush Administration is caught doing something illegal, immoral or evil (bonus if it's all three). Incendiary words like "large-scale attack" are used, Al Qaeda is linked and 100% industrial-strength horseshit is spewed. None of this nonsense is ever real, and I can't be the only one that's tired of seeing it on television like it matters.

"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."

On a blazing hot morning last week, 75 men and women of the highway - bus drivers, truckers and van operators - convened at a nondescript office building in Little Rock, Ark., to be trained as terrorist hunters. The Department of Homeland Security this year gave $19.3 million to the American Trucking Associations, which is based in Alexandria, Va., to recruit a volunteer "army" called Highway Watch. So far, 10,000 truckers have signed on to become amateur sleuths. Over the next year, the goal is to add tollbooth workers, rest-stop employees and construction crews, creating a corps of 400,000 people drawn from every state.

This is a list of supposedly "arabic-al-qaeda terrorist"-websites... but how many are in fact psy-op (psychological operations) sites made by the CIA or some other shadowy group? It is clear that alot of them are registered, not in Afganistan or Iraq but the USA or Europe...from a simple whois search on a site... : http://haganah.us/jihadi/salafy.html

by
C. Hughes

I was wondering if your paper would print a guest commentary by myself on 9-11 esp. since M. Moore's movie is coming out.



I believe, through research, that our CIA, FBI and a few members of our government, were being led by the globalists to bomb Oklahoma and 9-11 in our country (9-11 was the most sophisticated terror attack to date, along with the propaganda.) There are over 600 factual errors with the government's story about 9-11

http://www.infowars.com/sept11_archive.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html --

Most Europeans 60+% are in tune with the work of the globalist and their activities (they have been living it for hundreds of years.)

Just a few years ago it came out in the main stream media that MI5 was behind the war with Ireland and England. MI5 would secretly play both sides of the coin. When things were peaceful and "normal" they would  work with small cells and blow up a bus full of their own British children to get the war started up again. They would always provocateur (read provoke) things and use it to their means. Same thing with Mossad, they play both the Jewish and the Palestine sides of the same coin. To keep their military state legitimate and to control their territory. It's all about control.

- 9/11 - The Basic Questions - Questions for Michael Moore "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a powerful antiwar statement and needs to be supported for that reason. However, I would like to ask Michael Moore a few questions regarding his implication that Saudi Arabia was behind 9-11. - The Part of the Story Michael Moore Missed Let's take a look at the idea of Saudi Arabia as the perpetrator of 9-11. Why would they do it? What would they gain? and much more...

Exclusive to Rense.com
http://rense.com/general53/clasic.htm
Commentary by Moshe Cohen
NY NY
6-12-4

Transit police will begin randomly stopping riders on Boston's subways and commuter trains next month to search their bags and packages, a procedure transportation officials say was largely prompted by the March 11 train bombings in Spain. (follow link to read the complete article)

(March 20, 1962) - A recorded lecture in which the author of Brave New World discusses using terrorism to create willing slaves out of the population.

"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death." -- Adolf Hitler

 

 

The conditioning of students at Berkeley

http://www.sweetliberty.org/audio/huxley_conditioning.htm

 

Upon listening to part two of the Huxley presentation, one of our website visitors (http://www.sweetliberty.org/audio/huxley_conditioning.htm) discovered the following conversation approximately thirteen minutes into the clip.

He writes:

"On Tape 2, there arrives the moment when the official hour-long lecture should have come to a close. The assembled students are urged to make their way to their regularly scheduled classes. Those wanting to listen to the close of the question and answer session, are welcomed to remain in place.

If one pays very close attention to the 'side bar' between the fellow-insiders, this comes through loud and clear:

"Aldous, I do hope you're not finding it to be uncomfortably warm in here?"

"Well, it is getting to be a little warm. It seems to be a windowless Hall, isn't it? Is there any means at all of ventilation?"

"It is part of the CONDITIONING PROCESS, actually."

So, here you have it all before you on a silver platter.... much like the severed head of John the Baptist. This audience of students and faculty who IMAGINE that they are being entertained and enriched by the cornucopia of intellectual treats offered up by Aldous ...are themselves actually the VICTIMS of an elaborate, well-defined and highly organized Program-of-Indoctrination into the very 'Brave New World' that has been foreseen by the Elitist speaker whom they are, enthralled, listening to."

— G.W.

If you missed this portion of the second clip, click below.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/audio/hux3.ram

 

---

The Ultimate Revolution (Transcript)

 

March 20, 1962
Berkeley Language Center - Speech Archive SA 0269

audio: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/audiofiles.html#huxley

source of transcript: http://p197.ezboard.com/faldoushuxleyfrm1.showMessage?topicID=276.topic

 

Moderator:

{garbled}Aldous Huxley, a renowned Essayist and Novelist who during the spring semester is residing at the university in his capacity of a Ford research professor. Mr Huxley has recently returned from a conference at the Institute for the study of Democratic Institutions in Santa Barbara where the discussion focused on the development of new techniques by which to control and direct human behavior. Traditionally it has been possible to suppress individual freedom through the application of physical coercion through the appeal of ideologies through the manipulation of man's physical and social environment and more recently through the techniques, the cruder techniques of psychological conditioning. The Ultimate Revolution, about which Mr. Huxley will speak today, concerns itself with the development of new behavioral controls, which operate directly on the psycho-physiological organisms of man. That is the capacity to replace external constraint by internal compulsions. As those of us who are familiar with Mr. Huxley's works will know, this is a subject of which he has been concerned for quite a period of time. Mr. Huxley will make a presentation of approximately half an hour followed by some brief discussions and questions by the two panelists sitting to my left, Mrs. Lillian {garbled} and Mr. John Post. Now Mr. Huxley

Huxley:

Thank You.

{Applause}

Uh, First of all, the, I'd like to say, that the conference at Santa Barbara was not directly concerned with the control of the mind. That was a conference, there have been two of them now, at the University of California Medical center in San Francisco, one this year which I didn't attend, and one two years ago where there was a considerable discussion on this subject. At Santa Barbara we were talking about technology in general and the effects it's likely to have on society and the problems related to technological transplanting of technology into underdeveloped countries.

July 10, 2001, Tuesday The New York Times

By Larry C. Johnson http://www.berg-associates.com/larryc.htm

WASHINGTON -- Judging from news reports and the portrayal of villains in our popular entertainment, Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism. They seem to believe that terrorism is the greatest threat to the United States and that it is becoming more widespread and lethal. They are likely to think that the United States is the most popular target of terrorists. And they almost certainly have the impression that extremist Islamic groups cause most terrorism.

This article aims to shed light on the apparent execution by beheading of Nicholas Berg . I believe that most of the available evidence surrounding the case suggests that it was a “black operation”by US psychological warfare specialists, the purpose of which was to provide the media with a “moral relativity” argument to counter the adverse publicity over torture at Abu Ghraib prison.

More proof (if needed) that the Only Solution is The Plan

By Paul Joseph Watson

The ultimate form of control is fear and the fear that you could lose your life at any moment elicits a Pavlovian response towards those who claim they can protect you. Trauma based mind control is not a conspiracy theory and can be observed naturally after people have been subject to distress. The New World Order know this and that is why the U.S. and British governments issued a spate of fabricated terror alerts immediately after September 11 and continue to do so to this day. Concurrently we are reminded daily that it’s not a matter of if but when the next large terrorist attack occurs.

That is akin to a jail guard telling his boss that it’s not a matter of if but when all the prisoners are going to escape. 

If the individuals who staff our intelligence agencies are unable to prevent large-scale terrorist attacks then they should be fired. And yet since September 11 nobody in a position of authority has been sacked and in fact the majority have received raises in addition to the millions of extra funding that has poured in to the FBI and CIA. They have been rewarded for their complicity in 9/11.

To: The New York Times
From: giuseppefurioso(at)aol.com

Terrorism is the seemingly arbitrary use of violence against enemy civilians, the objective of which is to bring about a more favorable political settlement for the group the terrorists represent. The USS Cole was a ship of the line manned by military personnel, on active duty, engaged in the enforcement of a genocidal blockade, whose victims were overwhelmingly civilian. At the time it was attacked, the Cole had made its modest contribution to that blockade, which had thus far, accounted for the premature deaths of one and a half million Iraqi civilians, among them at least 500,000 children. One would be hard pressed to find a more legitimate military target than the Cole... Yet the New York Times, along with most of the media, continues to describe the attack on the Cole as a  ''terrorist attack''. ( '' Inquiry Into Attack on the Cole In 2000 Missed Clues to 9/11'' : New York Times, 4/11/04)
http://i.am/jah/defin.htm

One can only wonder whether or not the New York Times would have described Sam Adams and his pals as terrorists, if instead of boarding a British merchant ship to dump some tea overboard, they had instead attacked a British warship enforcing a blockade of Boston. It is interesting to note that as a direct consequence of the Boston Tea Party, the British closed the port of Boston in an effort to stifle resistance to royal authority. When rebellion did break out two years later, attacks on British ships and personnel by American patriots forced the British to eventually abandon
Boston.

--joe

giuseppefurioso(at)aol.com

Daily Times Monitor
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9

According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration’s assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to “plant” WMDs inside the country. Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by “friendly fire”, the Environmentalists Against War report.

Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq. According to Al Martin Raw.com, “Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense.”

The information that is being leaked out is information “obtained while she was in Germany heading up the debriefing of returning service personnel, involved in intelligence work in Iraq for the DoD and/or the CIA. “According to Ms Rogers, there was a covert military operation that took place both preceding and during the hostilities in Iraq,” reports Al Martin Raw.com, an online subscriber-based news/analysis service which provides “Political, Economic and Financial Intelligence”.

"... Within seconds of the first deadly explosions inside and outside Madrid's Atocha station, you could sense that the culprits to be blamed for this crime would be Osama Bin Laden and the fictional 'al Qaeda', but there was no point in writing about it then. The first three days immediately following the ten synchronized military explosions were pure unashamed George Orwell time, with Christian and Judaic media alike completely immersing the general public in their predictable mind games.

First it was claimed the perpetrators were members of Euskadi Ta Askatasuna [ETA] which means "Basque Homeland and Freedom," and a gratifying roar of spontaneous anger could instantly be heard all over the country. Relatives of the dead and injured badly needed somebody to hate, and the homespun terrorists from the northern Basque region of Spain would suffice in the first instance. This distraction served to focus public attention several hundred miles away from the four primary crime scenes, where closer inspection would surely have generated some very awkward questions for the Spanish authorities.

Then only a few hours later in what appeared to be a chilling and apparently stupid rerun of 9-11, police officers were tipped off by media about a suspicious white van parked near Alcala de Henares railway station, which was then found to contain a handful of detonators, and several Muslim religious tracts on a cassette tape. So the 'al Qaeda' fix was already in, though the media deliberately played it down at this early stage. As we will shortly discover, the western media already knew that the platform surveillance videotapes at Alcala de Henares showed no trace of any "Muslim Terrorists" boarding any of the four bombed trains, but did not wish local police to discover this glaring omission.

After a suitable delay during which the crimes scenes grew cold, and critical evidence was removed, the London-based Arabic newspaper, al-Quds al-Arabi, suddenly announced that it had received a letter from the Brigade of Abu Hafs al-Masri, claiming the bombings for al-Qaeda. This was the signal for global media networks to convert millions of sheeple all around the world, from their existing belief that Catholic Basques were responsible for the atrocity, to the newly-generated fiction that dangerous Muslim 'terrorists' had somehow slipped into Spain under the radar, and blown up four trains. This stunning religious conversion was reinforced when police found a planted unexploded haversack bomb in one of the train wrecks, which contained copper rather than aluminum detonators traditionally used by the Basques. ..."

Complete Report

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5943.htm

From correspondents in London

March 26, 2004: "The Australian" -- One of al-Qaeda's most dangerous figures has been revealed as a double agent who fooled MI5, raising intense criticism from European governments who had repeatedly called for his arrest.

Britain ignored warnings from friendly governments about Abu Qatada's links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him.

A leaked copy of a judgment by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission has revealed how British intelligence chiefs hid from their European allies how they were hoping to use the cleric as an informer against Islamic militants in Britain.

Qatada boasted to MI5 how he could prevent terrorist attacks in Britain and hoodwinked agents into believing he would expose dangerous extremists arriving, while all along he was setting up a safe haven for his terror organisation in the country.

"All the world's a stage..." (Shakespeare)

STAGED EVENTS
(aka Order Out of Chaos from latin Ordo Ab Chao)

The puppetmasters create "disorder" so the people will demand "order". The price of "order" always entails a handing over of control and loss of freedom on the part of the citizenry. Out of "chaos" comes "order" - THEIR order - their new WORLD order.

Orwell Today will list some historical and present-day examples of chaotic events that achieve the aims desired by the powers-that-be. This list is by no means complete but should give people the general idea.

The trick of creating chaos and then seizing power under the pretense of putting things back in order is a tried and true method of deception and manipulation. It's the meaning behind the Latin motto: ORDO AB CHAO meaning ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.

It's also referred to as the Hegelian Dialect after the philosopher Georg Hegel who wrote about its effectiveness. He described it as: THESIS -- ANTI-THESIS -- SYNTHESIS.

Others have described it as: PROBLEM -- REACTION -- SOLUTION in that firstly you create the problem; then secondly you fan the flames to get a reaction; then thirdly (like Johnny-on-the-spot) you provide a solution. The solution is what you were wanting to achieve in the first place, but wouldn't have been able to achieve under normal circumstances.

Orwell described it as REALITY CONTROL

There are literally HUNDREDS of examples of this method being used effectively throughout the course of history. A well-known example is the bombing of Pearl Harbor which resulted in the United States entering the Second World War. Chaos was required and so chaos was created. That's how it works. ~ Jackie Jura

Orwell Today

As there is ample proof that Al Queida had nothing to do with 911, and the authorities conveniently found a hire-car with Korans in it after 911 as "proof" of their involvement (that Al Queida has always denied), it looks like Madrid is another inside job by the NWO elite, using the same technique.
Joseph Mary Aznar wants to blame ETA and the rest want to blame Al Queida, so perhaps there's a rift between Aznar and Shrub/B-liar.

How the Madrid Attack is connected to Al-Qaeda, Bush, and the Pentagon Israeli Lobby Date: Mon, Mar 15, 2004, 7:00 pm

by Mark Glenn, mbg147 [at] yahoo [dot] com, March 8, 2003

 

Today, while driving through town, I wound up behind a minivan that had a big sticker on the back. The sticker had an Israeli flag in the middle of it, and under it the quotation from the book of Genesis that reads “I will bless those who bless thee.”

I would like to take this time to list my own reasons for thanking and blessing (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel, our lone ally in the Middle East, for everything she has done for us, since I am quite sure most Americans are unaware of just what kind of friend she has been to us.

"If the events of September 11th have proven anything, it's that the terrorists can attack us, but they can't take away what makes us American--our freedom, our liberty, our civil rights. No, only Attorney General John Ashcroft can do that." -----

Source: Jon Stewart on The Daily Show

 

You can say that again.

The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan and reinstate God's Royal Perfect Laws of Liberty:-
http://i.am/jah/plan.htm

To All,

I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.

Regarding the following post.., I don't know about you but I have thought about "where does this [law-making] end"? After 9-1-1 I read something about terrorism I found to be interesting. Perhaps you will also. The thrust of the article had to do with a study done on the concept/use of terrorism. Pretty simple actually. Let us say we were being terrorized by a source outside of the U.S.  The world knows the U.S. has the most formidable military this planet has ever seen. It is the "elephant". In other words a "frontal assault" would be suicide. Small, sustained "terrorist attacks" won't seem to do much to this "elephant" BUT, the "terrorized people" ASK for more and more "protection" from their governments and governments do respond with more and more laws and soon, the "terrorized society" has a police-state that is so out-of-control repressive.., the people rise up in rebellion and the country is destroyed from within. This concept/use of terrorism is easily linked to the Hegalian Dialectic.., "Problem", "Reaction", "Solution". It has been used for centuries flawlessly.  

Most, if not all of you are aware (the NWOdor OPERATING THROUGH) the U.S. government, at the very least, was complicit with the 1993 attempt to bomb the World Trade Center buildings, the bombing of the Murrah Building in OKC and 9-1-1. And most of you are aware of the plans of the NWOdor to destroy Amerika and reduce the world population by 85%. Hopefully you can see how all of the pieces to this world puzzle fit. From the elitist/globalist point of view, this planet cannot "sustain" an ever growing population and there is certainly truth in that position, so, they intend to play god's and DO something about it. We are experiencing the unfolding of their plan. How do you like it so far?

There is only one way to end this madness; ENFORCE "THE PLAN" @ www.i.am/jah/plan.htm

Please read on.

LLTF,
Roland


Let's tell legislators: There ought to be a freedom
by Mari Werner

Imagine a world where there are laws against eating too many sweets, standing on the top step of the ladder, or failing to show up for your doctor appointment. If you want to change your job or residence, you have to hire a lawyer to fill out and file the sheaf of forms required.

Imagine a world where every murder or assault trial requires years of litigation just to determine the charges. There's a different law for every location, weapon, and motivation. (Was it motivated by hate, gender, race, greed, stupidity, or some other syndromes or state of mind?)

Imagine a world where whole sections of large cities have been devoted just to housing the law library.

How far is this world from the one you live in?

Congress has been averaging about 235 new laws per year, and the California state legislature passed close to 1,000 laws last year alone. Has there ever been a session of Congress or any state legislature that ended with fewer laws on the books than there were at the beginning? Where is this leading?

Deuteronomy 4:2, The King of king's Bible Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you.
12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Our legislatures are passing laws on top of the laws that are already there just to make political points. The California legislature recently passed a law against attacking and threatening abortion clinics. Didn't we already have laws against assault and harassment? How many laws do we need to cover a single act?

Have we become such a race of cowards and whiners that we need laws to protect us from phone solicitors, laws to dictate how people can talk to us, and police involved in every corner of our lives?

It seems government is being looked to as the solver of every problem. And of course, government's problem-solving tool is law. As the saying goes, to a man whose only tool is a hammer, every problem is a nail.

From http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/11-18-98.html

Memo to Jess Helms from InfoTimes.

Note excerpt from US Army War College report that no evidence exists to support US claims that Iraq used gas on the Kurds.

I continue to make inquiry into the situation in Iraq, as it is likely to brew up into another crisis one of these days when the US Army War College has no choice but to conclude that Iraq is not hiding any weapons of mass destruction -- or if they are, they are so well hidden that nobody is going to find them.

As you know, I'm sure, the warhawks in the United States will continue to insist that the embargo remain in place no matter what, and there will be assertions from around the world that we have not been acting in good faith.

As you also know, I believe there are serious questions regarding our behavior toward Iraq that go back further. You would agree, I think, that at the very least our State Department gave a "green light" to Saddam Hussein to go into Kuwait in August 1990. The more I read of the events of the period, the more I believe history will record that the Gulf War was unnecessary, perhaps even that Saddam Hussein was willing to retreat back to his borders, but our government decided we preferred the war to the status quo ante.

In my previous correspondence with you on this matter, I had been in a quandary about the state of our relations with Baghdad during that critical period. In the months immediately preceding the "green light" given by our Ambassador, April Glaspie, a number of your Senate colleagues including Bob Dole had traveled to Baghdad, met with Saddam, and found him to be a head of state worthy of support.

Even Sen. Howard Metzenbaum [D-OH], a Jewish liberal and staunch supporter of Israel, gave him a seal of approval.

What disturbs me even now, Jesse, is that these meetings occurred after the Senate Foreign Relations committee had accused Iraq of using poison gas against its own people, i. e., the Kurds. Like all other Americans, in recent years I had assumed that what I read in the papers was true about Iraq gassing its own people.

Once the war drums again began beating last November, I decided to read up on the history, and found Iraq denied having used gas against its own people.

Furthermore, I heard that a Pentagon investigation at the time had also turned up no hard evidence of Saddam gassing his own people.

This is serious stuff, because the US Army War College tells us that 1.4 million Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the sanctions, which is
3,000 times more than the number of Kurds who supposedly died of gassing at the hands of Saddam.

Many of my old Cold Warrior friends practically DEMAND that we not lift the sanctions because if Saddam would gas his own people, he would gas anyone.

• A norwegian professor believes al-Qaida is a Pentagon-fiction:
  
  http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article.jhtml?articleID=396241

 

• Syrias president questions the existence of al-Qaida:
  
  http://www.gopusa.com/news/2003/may/0526_assad_denial.shtml
  May 26, 2003

  «Syria Denies Existence of Al Qaeda»

  «KUWAIT CITY (Talon News) -- Syrian President Bashar Assad revealed in a newspaper interview on Sunday that he does not believe there is a terrorist group called al Qaeda, the organization widely believed to be the perpetrators of the hijackings on September 11, 2001 as well as the recent attacks in Saudi Arabia and Morocco.»

  «"Is there really an entity called al Qaeda? It was in Afghanistan, but is it there anymore?" Assad asked.»

  «Assad speculated about the existence of al Qaeda and its notorious leader Usama bin Laden in a Kuwaiti newspaper called Al-Anba. »

  «Nevertheless, questioning the existence of the al Qaeda terrorist network is very popular in Arab countries. Many people in these countries believe that the United States has hyperbolized the danger of al Qaeda as a means for portraying Muslims as violent and dangerous.»
  
  

• Indonesian Bashir believes USA has invented al-Qaida:

  http://www.gsmpro.com/article/articledt.asp?hArticleId=39
  10/20/2002
  «Bashir on Friday accused the United States of inventing both al-Qaida and Jemaah Islamiyah to portray Muslims as terrorists.»
  

  http://www.vg.no/pub/vgart.hbs?artid=3054299
  «Bashir selv skylder på CIA og USA for å stå bak angrepet mot Bali. Han benekter også at gruppene Jemaah Islamiyah og al-Qaida eksisterer. »

 

• Al-qaida did not exist in Afghanistan

  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2897137.stm
  Friday, 28 March, 2003

  «According to Dadullah, al-Qaeda did not exist in Afghanistan and he said he did not know the fate or whereabouts of Osama bin-Laden. »
  

• MOSSAD was caught pretending to be "Al-Qaeda" in Palestine.
  http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html

  Anytime you hear the corporate news media mention "Al-Qaeda" it is just like in Orwell's "1984" when the telescreens would have their "Two Minutes Hate" and the sheeple would be programmed to be afraid of "Emmanuel Goldstein." A manufactured fake enemy, designed by the warmongering fanatics, to raise public fear and support for more wars to the necessary pitch.

Posted Dec 5, 2003 07:11 AM PST (on www.whatreallyhappened.com The tape also contains what U.S. counterterror experts say may be never-before-broadcast video of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York’s World Trade Center shot from across the East River in Brooklyn. The FBI says it is familiar with the video, which was provided by a friendly bystander. But that raises the question — how did a tape that was not widely circulated end up on a known al-Qaida site?

by Brendan O'Neill
28 November 2003

'Al-Qaeda bombing foiled' says the front page of today's UK Sun, reporting the arrest yesterday of 24-year-old student Sajid Badat in Gloucester, England, on suspicion of involvement in terrorist activity. Other reports have referred to Badat as 'having links with al-Qaeda' and being a potential 'suicide bomber' (1).

Also this week, media reports claim that al-Qaeda may have developed 'car-bomb capability' in the USA, and that al-Qaeda has compiled a 'kidnappers' manual' and is plotting to snatch American troops from Iraq and other parts of the Middle East. Every day since the 9/11 attacks of 2001 there have been media reports about al-Qaeda - its leaders, members, capabilities, bank accounts, reach and threat. What is this al-Qaeda? Does such a group even exist?

Some terrorism experts doubt it. Adam Dolnik and Kimberly McCloud reckon it's time we 'defused the widespread image of al-Qaeda as a ubiquitous, super-organised terror network and call it as it is: a loose collection of groups and individuals that doesn't even refer to itself as al-Qaeda'. Dolnik and McCloud - who first started studying terrorism at the prestigious Monterey Institute of International Studies in California - claim it was Western officials who imposed the name 'al-Qaeda' on to disparate radical Islamic groups and who blew Osama bin Laden's power and reach 'out of proportion'. Both are concerned about the threat of terror, but argue that we should 'debunk the myth of al-Qaeda' (2)...

http://www.rense.com/general44/expect.htm

Commentary
By Margita Lukkarinen
Helsinki, Finland
11-18-3

Dear Jeff,

Since Israel went to 'help' Turkey in solving the Istanbul bombing, the story seem to be turning upside down and all vital data seem to be 'forgotten'. I am enclosing an article from Israel:

1. We are expected to believe that ONLY 3 people did it.

2. Haaretz forgot that a brother of a cousin is a cousin too.

3. We are expected to believe that even thought the two bombers could walk away. they preferred to die in the vans , probably because they were too tired to fight the Zionists :-)

4. We are expected to forget that ALL initial reports indicated that the vans were parked.

5. We are expected to forget that all initial reports clearly said that the drivers were observed by local people walking away from the van.

6. We are not allowed to ask who put the bodies inside the vans before exploding them.

7. As usual, we are told that there is a link to Afghanistan even though this country has been already evaporated.

8. As usual 'they' 'found' a 'link' to Syria to justify attacking Syria soon.

8 Again we are expected to believe that al-Qaeda exist, based on 'intelligence' reports.

9. We are expected to believe that the 'suicide' bombers whom we were told repeatedly produced VERY sophisticated bombs, decided to use their own vans so that the rest of their family could be implicated and arrested.

10. We are expected to believe that the Turkish government, which until now insisted that there is clearly another government behind this bombing, changed its opinion this morning after getting 'help' from Israel, and decided that only one family is involved.

see also Turkish Top Military Brass meets Wolfowitz Turkish Top Military Brass meets Wolfowitz one day before Istanbul Attacks

 

Early last week, Rashi Abu Sba, head of the preventive security apparatus in Gaza, the equivalent of the Shin Bet, accused the Israeli security service of tricking young Palestinians into conducting missions in the name of Al-Qaida.

Hoover's Long Shadow

Commentary, Earl Ofari Hutchinson,
Pacific News Service, Nov 24, 2003

Editor's Note: The release of a confidential FBI memo detailing FBI surveillance of antiwar protesters shows that the FBI is once again in position to quell dissent and disrupt political organizing.

When Attorney General John Ashcroft dumped the old 1970s guidelines that banned FBI spying on domestic organizations last year, he also publicly pledged that the FBI would not be back in the spy business. But a recently released memorandum sent by FBI officials to local police departments is proof that FBI agents, if not back in the spy business, are inching up on it.

The memo, written before last October's anti-Iraq war protests, urged police to keep close tabs on protesters. FBI officials claim that their aim isn't to harass or intimidate protesters or chill political dissent, but simply to ferret out violence-prone radicals.

But that's what FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover claimed four decades ago. During the 1960s, Hoover kicked into high gear a super-secret and blatantly illegal counter-intelligence program called COINTELPRO, which targeted Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other black and anti-war protest leaders as well as thousands of innocent Americans. The mandate of the program was spelled out in one of the stacks of secret documents released by Senate investigators in 1976: to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and neutralize" groups and individuals the FBI considered politically objectionable. Those targeted in nearly all cases were not foreign spies, terrorists or individuals suspected of criminal acts.

"(Global Research Canada, 21 November 2003) The two Istanbul attacks respectively on the HSBC in the financial district and on the British Consulate were, according to media reports "timed to coincide with President George Bush's state visit to London."..."

 ...............................

"...It is also worth mentioning that the attacks took place one day following the completion of the annual Turkish-US Joint Defense Group meeting (17-19 November 2003).

21 November 2003

 

[Predicts or threatens?]

In the wake of the devastating bombings against British interests in Istanbul, Israeli officials and experts predicted Friday that the next target of global terrorism would be Europe.