To All,
I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.
The following is self-explanatory regarding the exposure of the fraud of the income tax. It is not very long. I hope you will take the time to read it.
Government is going on the offensive rather than answer a few legal questions in a public forum (they can't control). Who knows? The horse is out-of-the barn BUT, will enough of our informed fellow citizens stand firm? THAT is the question. Or will they collapse after government has "made examples" of the "tax-honesty movement" "LEADERS". Only time will tell.
All I know is; when I was in Washington, DC fasting until death to get that government to respond.., I put out three requests during 20 days to have others join us. NO ONE came. NO ONE!!
We'll see.
LLTF, Roland
Begin forwarded message:
MAJOR GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a Form W-4 (or its equivalent) or an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one's job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one's pay (for taxes fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
http://www.preferredservices.org/ Ax_the_Tax. 1. html (In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
----- Original Message ----- From: dandmc To: DanMeador Sent: Tuesday, September 23,
2003 6:36 AM Subject: MAJOR GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE
I've pasted in two posts below. Read them in inverse order (bottom to top). The first is by former CID agent Joe Banister, written following the effort to submit information at a recent Washington, D. C. confab where IRS moguls announced a new compact with state tax agencies to go after "abusive tax shelters" and the like. The second, immediately following my comments, is by John Wilde, an Arizona researcher & active "tax honesty movement" advocate.
In his post, Wilde restates a portion of what Winston Churchill said after the so-called Battle of London failed to defeat and demoralize the British people. In effect, this may not be the beginning of the end, but it should be the end of the beginning.
One of the major strategies IRS is deploying is to issue summonses to "tax honesty movement" leaders under alleged authority of
26 U. S. C. ??
6700 (promoting abusive tax shelters, etc.) and 7408 (the judicial enforcement section).
Needless to say, IRS doesn't have implementing regulations for these Code sections (See the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules), IRS isn't a Treasury enforcement agency (See Treasury Directive 27-03), and we now know that the Financial Management Service rather than IRS is the "delegate" of the Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of tax collection & refunds (See Treasury/FMS System of Records .014 for authorities), so we have what amounts to a foot race to the finish line.
Most if not all of the documents cited above are posted on the Law Research & Registry web site at http://www.lawresearch-registry.or g/lrrserch. htm
Yesterday I had the opportunity to read one of the ?? 6700/7408 summonses. It's quite a work. IRS is attempting to link tax honesty leaders (Yes, Dan Meador & the Law Research & Registry web site are mentioned in the thing). There is a laundry list of issues: The 861 source position is tacitly categorized as an "abusive tax shelter", questioning whether or not Congress legislatively created the Internal Revenue Service, questioning whether or not the Secretary of the
Treasury established revenue districts in States of the Union . . . questioning whether or not everybody is required to file Form 1040 returns is under the general umbrella of an abusive tax shelter.
The sweeping initiative is an obvious act of desperation. The Department of Justice and IRS simply cannot affirmatively establish IRS standing and application of federal income tax to the general population. In the last four years I've developed a laundry list of approximately seventeen questions relating to standing, venue and subject matter jurisdiction that IRS simply cannot and will not answer. We have sufficient documentation to hammer them on each issue. And we're learning enough about mandatory administrative procedure that they're in an inescapable corner.
We the People Foundation (Bob Schulz & company) has posed something in excess of five hundred questions. While I'm not ready to endorse each WTPF issue, the DOJ-IRS response to the WTPF initiative characterizes the overall posture. Fortunately, WTPF has had one of the nation's top attorneys come on board to take that case, and subsequent to receiving one of the ?? 6700/7408 summonses, Bob filed a First Amendment suit as a counter-attack. In the meantime, a Chicago-based organization has been playing "technicality" tag with IRS and sundry IRS agents and officers on a $500 billion injury suit for approximately three years.
What it boils down to is this: State and federal income and employment tax schemes are among the most sinister frauds ever perpetrated against a developed nation. Both have been thoroughly exposed. And if you read the Beardsley Ruml speech (also posted on LR&R), you even find motive. The basic purpose is control -- inflation and population control.
Several people have asked, "What do you think of the state-federal compact for exposing and prosecuting abusive tax shelter schemes?"
The motive is clear: The object is to put more boots on the ground. IRS simply doesn't have sufficient manpower to cope with growing resistance. DOJ & IRS have basically the same situation we're
confronted with in Iraq. Enough people know the truth and are willing to carry the battle forward that federal resources are being overwhelmed in administrative, judicial and political forums. And if they don't launch a major initiative, the handwriting is on the wall. We're unearthing enough documented, undeniable evidence to completely expose and bring the system down.
What's at stake? Exposing income and employment tax schemes for what they are has the potential for bringing about a general crisis in confidence. In other words, it's really a political rather than legal issue, and the current DOJ-IRS initiative is political in nature. So far as the law is concerned, they don't have a leg to stand on. Consequently, they're using the "abusive tax shelter" rationale to attack and attempt to undermine First Amendment rights to free speech, free press, freedom of assemble, and the right to petition for redress of grievance.
This morning there are 2,078 subscribers to the DanMeador list. In some respects that really isn't many, but when I write something worthwhile the article is posted to numerous other subscription lists and on sundry web pages. The dynamics of internet enable me and others to reach tens of thousands where in the past we were fortunate to reach hundreds.
Here is a key question: When does a parasite become a predator?
I've used this analogy in the past, but it's appropriate for this discussion. Government produces nothing. Every dime governments spend must in some way be taken from the people. At best, government is a parasite. It relies on funding by production and working classes. And as other parasites, governments become predators when their demands threaten the welfare and survival of the host.
Income and employment tax schemes are key elements of a mathematically impossible economic scheme. When they're exposed for what they are, the entire fiat system is vulnerable. And that is basically the reason IRS & DOJ have launched a strategy to try to silence those who are rapidly exposing the truth.
Will the strategy work?
No, it won't. Truth ultimately prevails. It is like acid poured on rust. It may take a while but it eventually reaches parent metal. And that's what the so-called tax honesty movement is all about. Those worth their salt are unearthing and exposing the truth. What we unearth reaches multitudes. And the increasing numbers who see the truth both directly and indirectly bring those issues to the political forum.
I was amused when reading the Congressional Record -- House for March 9, 1933. Congress was in effect held hostage & forced to pass banking reform legislation that withdrew gold backing from the Federal Reserve Bank Note. One of the representatives was concerned about what would happen if the scheme became common knowledge. He observed that, "Once the crap is out of the horse, you can't put it back in."
That's one of the reasons I've focused on posting source documents on the LR&R web page. What I have to say may or may not have merit unless it can be backed up by published authorities. If those authorities are made generally available, a thousand and maybe
thousands of thousands can take what I've done to the next stages whether I do or not. The crap simply cannot be put back in the horse.
Dan Meador
From: John Wilde Sent: Monday, September 22,
2003 1:40 PM Subject: Re: Fw: IRS Says Questions Answered - Let's Find Out
Hey ICE,
I know there has been a lot of lamenting about the fact that the gummint will not answer the questions or the redress. With all due respect to Joe and Bob, we got their answer on Tuesday. The problem was it wasn't an answer to the questions and demands. It was a somewhat cryptic threat, in the statement by Terry L. Lemons. He said.
"the recent spate of enforcement actions taken by the I. R. S. against promoters of abusive tax schemes, and the new agreement with the states, show other ways that government is answering the petition."
That's their answer. They're coming after us, or so they think. They will sue those that challenge their authority and threaten us with additional cooked up enforcement schemes. In other words gummint is getting desperate.
Some of us have been made aware that big bro is planning its own version of "shock and awe" against the tax movement. Sources have indicated that at sometime in the near future, the gummint is planning a multiple district, simultaneous raid on about 3 dozen or so "leaders" in the tax movement.
Those in gummint who are planning this raid believe that it will once and for all put a death knell in tax movement. Just the opposite. If this raid is pulled off, it will be the biggest mistake that gummint will make. I predict that it will be the "end of the beginning". NO, I didn't say it wrong. For those of you who are Babylon 5 fans you know what I mean. This will be the last thing that government will have to do for us to once and for all break down the last few barriers that stand between us and the beginning of that final stretch of the straight road to freedom.
The 3 dozen of those that are being targeted will not be shut down. In fact they will be up and running the next day. It's amazing what you can prepare for when your enemy is so predictable. The government will always under estimate you, right up to the point that the over estimate you.
What we have here folks King George III in all of his splendor. He has been reincarnated. This foolishness from the DOJ and IRS may prove to be this regime's metaphorical Lexington and Concord. It is going to be an interesting few weeks.
Since we know what the gummint's answer is, the question now is what are we going to do now. Bob's suggestion of stopping the withholding is a sound tactic. The means by which it is being carried out concerns me greatly. Nonetheless, one thing is for sure, if you aren't up front and in the face of gummint, then nothing is going to happen. We can no longer worry about what gummint thinks or is planning to do. They've already told us.
Writing letters isn't going to make it either. All actions must be geared towards forcing the bureaucrats to march down that long road, just as the British did on that fateful day on April 19, 2003. That way they will be exposed and can be picked off by the minute men of today. Not with guns and bullets, but with paper and the word processor, so that they will be made incapable of fighting back.
g'day John Wilde
ice wrote:
From: "Automailer - freedomabovefortune. com" Sent: Monday, September 22,
2003 8:45 AM Subject: IRS Says Questions Answered - Let's Find Out
Dear Friends and Supporters:
As you are probably aware, last week a group of We The People Congress
(WTPC) volunteers joined Bob Schulz and three former IRS agents to publicize the latest government scheme to dodge legitimate questions about the administration and enforcement of the federal income tax and to further erode the long-standing, legally acceptable practice of tax avoidance.
Treasury and IRS officials held a press conference to announce their scheme to curb what they call "abusive tax avoidance". Unfortunately, from the federal government's viewpoint, any legitimate questioning by the citizenry is viewed as abusive behavior.
According to the New York TImes, IRS officials claimed at the press conference that they had answered questions posed by the We The People Foundation/We The People Congress and that those answers could be found at the IRS web site and in print publications.
The We The People Foundation/We The People Congress has formulated an excellent way for us to prove that the answers to our questions are not on the IRS website and print publications. Please take a few minutes to visit www. givemeliberty. org to see the plan.
Kind Regards,
Joseph R. (Joe) Banister, C. P. A. Former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent
www. freedomabovefortune. com
