London Terror Attack 07.07.05

I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.

Most of us woke up this morning to news of the London bombings.  

Indeed news is still sketchy but the "authorities" claim they already know who is responsible.

We offer this for your consideration; The timing is to distract the masses away from the G8 meeting and debt-relief for Africa. Another inside-job ratchetting-up to the next level of their evil plan.

British people have been resisting ID cards and some legislation so this is to change their minds to accept more control.

Does this not make perfect sense?

As you read the following.., please click on the hyper-links. Hopefully you will find the information helpful as you strive to make sense of the madness.

FEW will believe the New World Order PLAN includes the DESTRUCTION of Amerika and England.

May I strongly suggest doing your own research.

And look at what is happening right before our eyes.

NAFTA and GATT [and now CAFTA] were/are "tools" to wreak havoc on the Amerikan economy. As one author wrote nearly 10 years ago, "America will be a Third World country within 20 years."

Look at our manufacturing base [and the jobs] FLOODING out of our country.

Look at the MILLIONS of illegal immigrants that are being ENCOURAGED to flood into our country [and the myriad repercussions].

Look at how we are being debased and dumbed-down as a people.  

Look at the ever-growing police state.

Look at the ONGOING "War on Terror" and the BILLIONS of dollars being poured into these bogus wars.

Look at the debasing of our "money" [worldwide and the inflation we are experiencing {oil may reach $100.00 per barrel for crude by year’s end}].

Look at the corruption in all of our governments and judicial system and law enforcement agencies.

Look at the insanity everywhere. If you are a "patriot"..? you now have an incurable mental disorder.

Look at the insanity in our "practice of medicine". No cures. Only drugs with some pharmaceutical companies receiving profits of 27,000%.

Look at our DEPENDENCE on energy and food.

And then look at how docile a people we have become. Less than 1% even have a clue as to what is really going on.

Have we been perfectly "set up" for destruction?  You will have to decide.

The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan against the traitorous N.W.O. Zionist mass-murder, inside-job perpetrators of OKC, 911 and the phoney War on Terror of which this psyop is part:-

Long live The Fighters,


A collection of related articles:

What's Behind the London Attacks?

Who Stands To Gain? Israel Warned, Cover-up In Progress

London has bombed itself before

An Illuminati Ordered 'Terrorist' Attack In London

How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
The ten step method to staging a terorrist attack and framing Arab patsies while ensuring none ofthe real culprits are ever discovered.

London Bombings - To Save Bush/Blair/Queen?

Tony Blair Ordered The London Bombings

Blair Rejects Calls For Govt Bombing Probe

London is World Terror Headquarters

Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi "Insurgents"--and Global Terrorism?

'Al Qaeda': How the Pentagon/ CIA Made an 'Enemy'

Search for Al-Qaeda related articles on

Galloway Wary Of Staged Terror Attack As Pretext For Iran Invasion
"Galloway was confident that massively opposed public opinion would stop an attack from taking place, unless a staged terror attack carried out by the military industrial complex and blamed on Iran was carried out."

Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks

Israel not 'warned of attacks

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack

also see: Alex Jones is Wrong on London Terror Drill

Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Was Giuliani in London for terror 'exercises'?

Giuliani Linked to London Terror Drill Boss

'All The Hallmarks Of Al Qaeda' - NOT

Glaring Flaw in London Suicide Bombs Tale


more London-bombing archives:

The 7/7 London Papers

commentary by WRH:

Which is a perfect cover for people pretending to be terrorists to plant real bombs instead of fake ones, isn't it?

Just like on 9-11 when an ongoing NORAD exercise tracking 20 simulated hijacked planes provided cover for four real hijacked planes.

No working cameras at the airports where the terrorists boarded the 9-11 planes.

No working cameras on the double-decked bus.

Advance warning to Odigo.

Advance warning to Netanyahu.

Folks, do I have to paint you a picture here?

Cui bono? Stupidity Versus Logic in the Latest “Terror” Attack

Global Warming

Fortunes made on bombing


Timeline of the blasts


Madrid Bombing: 

Spain suspects 'were informants' 

The Spanish interior ministry says it is investigating reports that two suspects in the 11 March Madrid train bombings were police informants. ( via WRH)

The presstitutes are trying to draw links between Madrid and London. Let us not forget the part where the suspects were connected to the government.

Madrid Bombers Linked to Spanish Security Service

Like Madrid, like London? (via WRH)

more about the Madrid Bombing

What's Behind the London Attacks?

The bombing of the London Underground was a false-flag operation designed to keep the West mired in war. Don't believe otherwise.

By Matt Hutaff  Jul 7, 2005

Only one word sprang to mind when I heard about the bombings that claimed the lives of dozens of Londoners today – convenient.

Is there anything convenient in death, or in thousands of lives destroyed from catastrophe? No – and words cannot express the sorrow I feel for the men and women changed by today's events. But governments with skeletons in their closets have a great deal to gain from a national tragedy bolstered by "terrorism."

As I sit in my office today, I hear the whispers of co-workers now utterly convinced our war on terror must continue. Despite American and British involvement in the Middle East birthing wave after wave of rebel forces, the Bush doctrine is now justified in the minds of millions. Petty grievances such as the Downing Street Minutes, the President's flagging support and Karl Rove's treasonous outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame are unimportant. A shadowy conglomeration is out to kill us.

Sound familiar? It should – the same emotional ploy was used to great effect on Americans in the wake of September 11th. Question nothing, particularly your cries for vengeance or that nagging feeling in the back of your head. Justice delayed is justice denied.

Unlike four years ago, however, I refuse to accept that the attack on London was anything less than a false-flag operation designed to enrage Western "civilization" against the Middle East. Why? Because there is no reason for "terrorist" groups to attack England. As recently as this week, the Ministry of Defense announced that plans were being drafted that would pull British armed forces from the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. With the British effectively admitting they're throwing in the towel, the only motivation to stay could come from an attack that compels the forces to stay and fight "global terrorism."

Think about it. The attack only benefits empires desperate to maintain a foothold in the Middle East without further eroding public opinion. Will Parliament shrug their shoulders and push their soldiers into longer tours of duty because of this? Obviously it's too early to tell, but if that happens, insurgents and rebels will have lost more than they could have ever possibly gained in destroying part of the Underground.

Brian Kilmeade of Fox News agrees, claiming the sabotage "works to ... [the] Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together." It doesn't just make "terrorism" an American problem. It makes it a worldwide problem. The Number One problem.

No longer do we need to concern ourselves with two world leaders (who have spawned more worldwide terrorism than any fanatical religious organization) going unquestioned in their lies that started a war. We can cast off our sluggish economies, lack of freedoms and pitiful descent into draconian law. Terror is on the rise.

I feel like I'm sitting in my apartment watching the World Trade Center collapse all over again.

Everything is the same, right down to the previously unheard of Islamic group (The Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe? Are you kidding me?) taking credit – even though the translation falls apart under scrutiny and the Q'uran is improperly cited. Considering the only Al Qaeda cell to ever be uncovered was a front for the Mossad, you'd think the perpetrators could at least come up with a clever new booga-booga name to grab headlines. Their arrogance is startling.

As is the ever-present Israeli connection, a staple among false flag operations. Before today's attack, the Israeli Embassy in London was notified an attack was forthcoming. As a result, former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remained in his hotel room rather than head towards a nearby hotel where he was to address an economic summit.

The embassy denies it had any prior knowledge, of course, but the story has changed dramatically in the process. If, as they say, Netanyahu was not warned, how did he know to stay in his room? How did he know the danger was so severe that he dare not venture out of the hotel?

Oops! The story's changed again – here Netanyahu says that British police had warned the Israelis (but not the rest of the city?) of a pending attack. Scotland Yard denies this; Israel's reply was to say Netanyahu received his warning after the first blast. How? It was initially reported as a power surge for hours. What is being hidden here? And why isn't there an investigation into these obvious discrepancies?

It's enough to make your head spin and your eyes cross with rage.

Regardless, I am making an appeal to Britons who are understandably wracked with grief at the moment – don't buy into the hatred the way we Americans did. Don't ignore the obvious evidence that this whole affair was orchestrated by your own government. Most importantly, don't let the deaths of the few, however tragic, plunge your nation into another fit of war and civic clampdowns.

Toying with your emotions is expected. Don't fall prey to ignorance. See the attack on your home for what it really is – a distraction that will keep your money, resources and troops mired in ceaseless battle for an ideology that betrays your democratic and civilized tenets.

Honor your dead with tears, not a cry for war or praise for a disgraced leader.

Canon Fodder is a weekly analysis of politics and society.

Not the first time Israel seems to have foreknowledge.  Check out the 911 Odigo story.

Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks

There has been massive confusion over a denial made by the Israelis that the Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks “minutes before” the first bomb went off July 7. Israel warned London of the attacks a “couple of days ago,” but British authorities failed to respond accordingly to deter the attacks, according to an unconfirmed rumor circulating in intelligence circles. While Israel is keeping quiet for the time-being, British Prime Minister Tony Blair soon will be facing the heat for his failure to take action. ...


Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast

( Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred. The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit. At present, train and bus service in London have been suspended following the series of attacks. No terrorist organization has claimed responsibility at this time. Israeli officials stress the advanced Scotland Yard warning does not in any way indicate Israel was the target in the series of apparent terror attacks.

Was Israel Warned Ahead of First Blast?

Reports just in suggest U.S. Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.

The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit.

At present, train and bus services in London have been suspended following the series of attacks.

Israeli officials have stressed the advanced Scotland Yard warning does not in any way indicate Israel was the target in the series of apparent terror attacks.

Then they "Orwellize" the story and say Israel was not warned!

Israel not 'warned of attacks' 12:49pm (UK)

Israel was not warned about possible terror attacks in London before at least six blasts ripped through the city, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom has said.

A Foreign Ministry official had said earlier that British police warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terror attacks minutes before the first explosion.

"There was no early information about terrorist attacks," Shalom told Israel Army Radio. "After the first explosion an order was given that no one move until things become clear."

© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2005, All Rights Reserved.

Quote:- "One historical irony: I doubt whether the planners knew that one of the target areas, that in Russell Square, was within a stone's throw of a building that served as the first headquarters of the World Zionist Organization that preceded the State of Israel.

It was at 77 Great Russell Street that Dr. Chaim Weizmann, a renowned chemist, presided over the effort that culminated in the issuing of the Balfour Declaration, the first international recognition of the right of the Jewish people to a national home in what was then still a part of the Ottoman Empire."

Apparently coordinated blasts across London's transport network on Thursday bear similarities to last year's Madrid bombings and suggest an attack in the style of al Qaeda, security analysts said. [Madrid bombings which where clearly an inside job..]



CNN (mirror)

"A second bus was reported to have been damaged in Tavistock Square.

Describing the Russell Square blast, eyewitness Belinda Seabrook told the UK Press Association she saw an explosion rip through the bus as it approached the Square."

Tavistock Square, and Russel Square, calling cards of the psyop fake terror perpetrators? Right now this incident reminds me a bit of the Madrid train bombing -

Subject:       [888] Re: London has been bombed
Date:       Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:32:16 -0000
From:       Ranall <rds [at] acsu [dot] buffalo [dot] edu>

Everything in creation is symbolic.

Today's news:   Underground bomb blasts occur in London tunnel between Kings Cross Underground and Russell Square.   Another bomb on a
double-decker bus outside of Tavistock Hotel.

It's blamed on Al Queda Europe.   (c;

The symbols tell you who is behind it.

Underground (symbol for hidden, secret)

Kings Cross (The rulers, both king and cross are symbols of establishment, ie state and church)

Russell Square (Russell Trust is another name for the infamous Skulln and Bones Society of which three generations of Bushes are members;
Square is a well-known symbolic motif of secret societies like freemasonry)

Double-decker bus (as a public conveyance, bus symbolizes the masses, that is the way they go (believe/live);  double decker symbolizes
layers of meaning).

Tavistock Hotel (hotel is a rented place for the public to live/sleep;  Tavistock is connected to the infamous Tavistock Institute of Human Relations at Oxford... cf:

What do the symbols say?   That the enemy is within the gates.  This was orchestrated by those leading Britian and the US governments.
Why?  Because crisis brings opportunity and by manufacturing crisis, you achieve agendas that otherwise could not happen.  Al Queda Europe are the ruling elite, not poor camel-jockeys.

While we vainly search for an enemy without, the real enemy is within.

That last sentence is another metaphor.

Life is certainly interesting.  (c;


Cui bono? Stupidity Versus Logic in the Latest “Terror” Attack

by Anthony Wade Friday 8th July 2005 End

Wow, al Qaeda must be the stupidest terrorists, no wait, stupidest people period, on this entire planet. Their purported goal is to shake the will of the western powers that have invaded Iraq, and to drive them out, no?

Then can someone please explain to me the logic of the London bombings?

No seriously, it is time to apply logic to these events. Please do not hand me the nonsense about these people being “killers” who do not apply logic. You do not become the number one terrorist organization without having some logic, no? We are expected to swallow that these people were smart enough to circumvent our billion dollar intelligence and air defense systems with box cutters, but they cannot play coherent cause-effect scenarios out in their mind prior to carrying out terrorist activities? I doubt that very much.

Just this week, it was reported that England had drafted plans to pull out their troops, gone, see you later, victory for al Qaeda, right?

So we are to believe then that the orchestrated response to these plans was to blow up a double decker bus, in England.

Now, can you guess what the most likely response to such an event would be:
1) Pull the troops out faster
2) Galvanize public support, thus keeping the troops in Iraq

Those of you that selected number one, I will assume you work for the Bush administration. Those of you that selected number two, good job. Now that we have established the enormous stupidity in the England bombings, the next logical front to examine is here in the United States.

Let’s examine the political climate here in this country just prior to this “attack”. Support for the Iraq War was at an all time low.

People were unmoved by the President’s speech, dropping his overall approval rating to 43%. The drums of impeachment were growing louder with each passing day, with the revelations that the Downing Street Memos do indeed prove that George Bush committed felonies in lying to Congress and starting war without Congressional approval.

Also on our political front was the Valerie Plame story and how it appears there is a good chance that Karl Rove committed treason in outing a covert CIA operative, who just happened to be assigned to uncovering WMD. Considering the closeness of Rove to Bush, if these allegations proved to be true, then how much of a stretch is it to assume Bush had complete foreknowledge of the revenge against Joe Wilson by outing his wife.

Now the corporate media has tried very hard to ignore these stories. We have had coverage of the Michael Jackson trial, and most recently the missing girl in Aruba for months now as Bush’s world unraveled daily.

No offense to the Holloway family but the story about Natalie’s events should not be a lead story on any news show, with the possibility of
- impeachment, treason, and the Iraq War events happening daily.

But there was our media, firmly in the pocket of George Bush, pimping the pain of the Holloway family as the most important news story. This aside though, the real stories were finally starting to poke through. Mainstream media received so many complaints about their ignoring potentially Bush-damaging stories, that they finally had to cover them.

Now, from al Qaeda’s perspective one would logically conclude this is a good thing. We were told by the Bushies that a vote for John Kerry was a vote for al Qaeda because they were so afraid of the great warrior, Bush. Considering the plummeting poll numbers for Bush and calls from the grass roots in this country for his political head, one should conclude that
- al Qaeda would be happy that the news had finally turned its attention to the possibility of getting rid of Bush.

Please do not hand me the nonsense about how they do not look at these events. We are led to believe that al Qaeda runs their own website so they can leak stories that help Bush and claim credit for their own terrorist activities so it is obvious they are on the cutting edge of technology and Internet news.

So I ask again, given that the events in the US are in the favor of al Qaeda, and that public opinion for the war had been steadily eroding, I must ask the obvious question.

Why in the world would they now carry out another terrorist mission?

Are we honestly to believe they did not think about what the ramifications were?

If the war was going poorly for them and the world was united against them, then I could understand an attack to break our will, but when things are going well, why in the world would they carry out this attack?

It has now been reported that: “BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner said a previously unknown group calling itself the Secret Organisation Group of al-Qaeda of Jihad Organisation in Europe had claimed to be behind the attacks in a statement posted on an Islamist website. The group’s statement said the attacks were revenge for the "massacres" Britain was committing in Iraq and Afghanistan and that the country was now "burning with fear and panic", he added. ” Uh-huh. So, al Qaeda carried out the attacks for the massacres committed by the British troops, which are miniscule in comparison to the US. They further carried out the attacks in complete obliviousness to the news of the imminent British troop pullout. They further carried out these attacks despite the fact that Bush’s poll numbers were in the toilet and heading lower, leading to a possibility of impeachment.

They further carried out these attacks even though the media had finally begun to cover the stories that could be potentially damaging to the entire war machine that they are fighting against.

Wow, they are some stupid terrorists.

The level of stupidity is equal to when Osama bin Laden released his latest hit video, four days before the Presidential election.

Surely he must have realized that would have only aided Bush, yet there he was providing America with a little fear before the election, a move that only could have helped Bush.

Today, here is his little outfit, al Qaeda, once again coming to the aide of his alleged arch-nemesis Bush.

Cui bono is a Latin phrase which simply means, “Who benefits?” and it is the question we need to be asking ourselves. What does al Qaeda gain from this attack? The only logical answer can be, NOTHING. It will instill fear in the populace which could lead to a galvanizing of public support for the war they are fighting.

It may lead to England changing their plans about pulling out their troops. It will give the US corporate media an excuse to not cover the stories that had been corroding the support for Bush.

Instead of the potential impeachment, treason by Karl Rove, and the Downing Street Memos, the corporate media will be hammering the story about the terror attacks in England and how they show the need for this continuous war.

I am sorry but when asking cui bono, it is clear that al Qaeda does not benefit from this attack, as it undermines everything they are working toward.

The war machine however, they benefit greatly. Their two main proponents, Bush and Blair get to play on people’s fears and reinvigorate support for their war.

This event is only a few hours old, but here are their initial responses: "They are trying to use the slaughter of innocent people to cow us, to frighten us out of doing the things that we want to do.

They "should not and they must not succeed," - Tony Blair. Really Tony?

But your government had already decided to pull the troops out of England, so why would they need to carry out this attack and risk England changing their minds?

No Tony, there is clearly no logic behind this attack and they clearly are not trying to frighten a people who have already agreed to pull out their troops, and who only represent less than
5% of the troops to begin with.

Here is what our fearless leader, Bush, had to say today: “"The war on terror goes on." Ah yes!, every now and again, people who Lie for a Living slip up and reveal the truth. This statement reveals exactly the purpose of the attacks, and answers the question, cui bono.

Faced with plummeting poll numbers and declining public support Bush tried last week to calm the storm by going to the American people with more fantasies connecting 911 to Iraq.

The American people did not buy it this time though and his numbers got worse. Then the “Karl Rove is a treasonous traitor” stories started popping up and Bush was faced with the prospect of his war not continuing and his staunchest ally, England announced their plans for pulling troops out just as George was saying what a mistake it would be to make such plans.

The morale in the al Qaeda camp must have been at an all time high. Their efforts in the war were finally paying off.
- Bush was losing his public support and his own country was beginning to speak about removing him from office.
- His top aide was under investigation for possible treason.
- England had started to make plans to pull out their troops.

So it is at this time, we are to believe that an organization smart enough to pull off 911, decided to throw away all the progress mentioned above, to frighten a people whose government only has 5% of the current troops in the war on terror, and had just decided to pull those troops out?

The word stupidity would not cover this decision. It is unfathomable in its illogic. I understand this raises things we do not want to consider. Well, consider this. In the early 1960’s your government considered operations that would sacrifice innocent, civilian American lives in order to start a war with Cuba.

I will not rehash Operation Northwoods
( /20010430/ ) here except to point out that it is horribly naïve to assume people in power, would not seek to abuse that power for their own ends. If this was true in 1962, it is even truer in 2005.

We see the images of terror on the television and we remember our fear, just like we were supposed to. Our President will use this attack to rebuild all he has lost in support and we cannot allow that to happen.
- This attack does not change the fact that George Bush started his war 6 months prior to obtaining Congressional approval.
- It does not change the fact that he knowingly lied to Congress to go to war, fitting his intelligence around his policy.
- It does not change the fact that Karl Rove apparently
- may have Committed Treason against the United States.
- Don’t let him use this tragic event to sway us from pursuing the truth.

Don’t let him. Cui bono America, Cui bono. Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to opednews. com, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a
37-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple websites. A Christian progressive and professional Rehabilitation Counselor working with the poor and disabled, Mr. Wade believes that you can have faith and hold elected officials accountable for lies and excess.

Anthony Wade’s Archive:

by Anthony Wade Friday 8th July 2005 End

 London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack
Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames


A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm. [continued...]

Global Warming

I notice that the attacks on London are covering up what is happening at the G8 meeting on the Climate. This morning I read in the online version of the Sydney Morning Herald that thousands of Polar bears are going to die from the 'Heat'.
Why is it,  that NOT one of the cretins working for the newspapers has bothered to notice that even if the World Temperature goes up 2-3 degrees the Temp at the Poles varies from MINUS 40 degrees to Minus 60 degrees.
Why is it I get the feeling we are being SETUP in a big way?


'All The Hallmarks Of Al Qaeda' - NOT

From Philip Hoag


A. Synchronized timing devices ........not triggered by suicide bombers (CNN)

B. "high explosives" .......not homemade material...The bombs used in the attacks held less than 10 pounds of explosives each. (CNN)

C. Bombs had 'level of sophistication' ...military grade...attacks had used timers.... "In Israel we've had coordinated (suicide) bombings but they've never been that close," ..."If they've got down to a minute that would be an all-time record." (CNN)

Prime Minister Tony Blair said investigators still don't know who was behind the attacks, but said a group like al Qaeda was probably responsible ????


1. Synchronized timing devices
2. Bombs with a high 'level of sophistication'
3. Military grade explosives
4. Closely coordinated bombings down to a minute

al Qaeda was probably responsible ????

It sounds more like all the hallmarks of a Western intelligence service.


( categories: )