Architect Richard Gage on the 9/11 WTC collapses.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
frankb344's picture

Very interesting interview.

Very interesting interview. I would like to see his reaction to the 9/11 Myths Debunked articles and tv shows. If he could go point-by-point, explaining why they are wrong...then he would have a strong argument.

If the government knew the planes were going to crash into the trade center, is it possible to use a limited amount of nano-thermite to start a collapse? The main argument against the controlled-demo theory is that too much work would need to be done. If a experimental-grade, U.S. Military developed, incendiary material was placed on key structural segments with the fore-knowledge of a plane collision...could this be possible? I am no architectural/structural engineer nor an expert in explosive devices, but this hypothesis could squelch the argument against controlled-demolition.

Frank Brown
Immigration lawyer
Seattle, WA

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account associated with the e-mail address you provide, it will be used to display your avatar.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Syndicate content