August 2006 Terror Scare

This is a growing list of articles concerning this event.

The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan against the traitorous N. W. O. Zion-Nazi mass-murder, inside-job perpetrators of OKC, 911, Bali, 7/7/7 and the phoney War on Terror and the people's rights, as I have been telling you since before 911 and since Bush came to power:-



Bomb Plot “Key Player” a CIA-ISI Asset

12-year old boy used in attempt to rescue the alleged 10 plane terror-plot's credency additional discussion)

Today, in several British mainstream media sources, a story has been running about an un-named 12-year old boy who managed to get on a Monarch airlines plane without a passport and boarding ticket.

Daily Mail - Boy, 12, makes a mockery of air security

Other Google results for this story

We had recently learnt that some of the arrested suspects in the alleged plot to blow up 10 planes over the Atlantic did not have any passports.

People were beginning to ask, "how could they blow up a plane in mid-air, let alone get on it, if they did not have passports?"

And right on cue, this story about a 12-year old boy appears. He managed to get on a plane without a passport before the plane's pilot "discovered" him.

Strange isn't it? That once on the plane itself, it would be the pilot and not the staff, who discovered he had no passport? Although it must be stated that some reports now claim it was a "member of the crew" who discovered he had no passport or boarding ticket. Covering up loose ends now. Just like in the London 777 false-flag. Changing the story to make it tighter, or to leave us all baffled as to what the real version is, and give themselves plenty of options to pick and choose from when required.

But the puppet-masters of the phoney war on terror do not leave things there. Today, the Guardian reports that a man, yes a man, not just a boy, with a briefcase (dear God, a briefcase! imagine what it was carrying!), got onto a plane that he was not supposed to be on either, on Tuesday! The day after the boy incident occurred...

Thomas Cook Airlines are demanding answers from Gatwick Airport after a man was able to enter a plane being cleaned and readied for takeoff, it has emerged.

The man was discovered clutching a briefcase inside the plane at 1.10am on Tuesday, Thomas Cook Airlines said.

A spokesman said: "He was spotted in the forward galley, in front of the flight deck, holding a briefcase. He was not supposed to be on that plane."

He continued: "He was challenged by our security staff.

"When he was challenged he disappeared.

"We have asked Gatwick Airport to explain how the passenger managed to find his way onto our aircraft."

The plane was parked at Gatwick's South Terminal.

A Thomas Cook Airlines spokesman said: "The aircraft was fully searched and we were happy the aircraft was secure to accept passengers."

The plane took off for Palma in Majorca on Tuesday at 6.15am.

The spokesman said: "The matter is now in the hands of Sussex Police."


He disappeared into thin air when he was challenged! LOL.

So now, whenever the question is raised about how alleged terrorists could manage to get on planes to blow them up, without having passports and/or boarding tickets, the "authorities" (policy enforcers for the "Elite") can point to not just one but TWO recent incidents where people have managed to do exactly this...

And if people get even more scared when they hear about these incidents, which are being blamed on either incompetence or complete bafflement as to how they were achieved, well, that's even better! More fear! More terror!

Watch the talking heads today on your favourite hateful news channel faithfully encourage their viewers to understand that yes, it is possible and it has been proven now, that you don't need passports and/or boarding tickets to get on a plane and blow it up!

The government's story is true after all people! You are now free (again) to believe what they tell you! They have removed one major obstacle and are working on removing the rest, so you can rest easy and continue to believe they would never concoct such a plot themselves to further their own agenda! Oh how nice it is now that this has been explained. For one moment you really thought it made no sense... but now everything makes government-sanitized sense once more!

Enjoy your freedumbs...

Note:- Both incidents occurred (if true) at Gatwick airport, in the space of two days.


Doesn't look as if people are going to choose option A (Plan), so now Armageddon is inevitable. Time to find The Way home.






America Duped on British Terror Plot

The story of the British liquid-bombers is quickly falling apart, not that the Times or the Post is taking any notice.

  1. First comes the NBC report that many of the accused hijackers did not own passports, thus making them ineligible to board an international flight (Remember, Michael Chertoff said that "We were really getting quite close to the execution phase" of the plot);
  2. NBC also reports that the U.S. pressured Britain to arrest the plotters earlier than they had otherwise wanted;
  3. The only statement that the accused were planning to use liquid explosives on planes came from an accused murderer who was on the run in Pakistan and subsequently tortured;
  4. The explosive the plotters were supposed to be using was identified by government officials to be TATP, or triacetone triperoxide, which as Thomas C. Greene explains, is extremely volatile during preparation, requires carefully controlled conditions to properly mix, including refrigeration (difficult to do in "false-bottomed sports drink bottles") and would require an extremely large quantity in order to damage an aircraft. The idea that a) sufficient quantities of TATP precursors could be smuggled aboard and b) it could be successfully mixed without either blowing up or overcoming the would-be terrorist with its fumes is preposterous.
Folks, this plot was never a plot. National security is being used as a political football, and the media, which could take this nonsensical story to pieces with a couple of days of research, is silent.



No dead Lebanese children on TV today

"---There have been, reportedly, 21 people arrested. There have been no terrorist attacks, no explosions. US sources are reported as saying that explosive devices have been found, but no news from the Police as yet.

I am reminded of the Forest Gate arrests and the notorious "Chemical weapon vest" which was threatening London and required 270 policemen and a four mile air exclusion zone to deal with. The media was shoving that out just as uncritically as it is shoving out this air attack, even though it made no sense. Anyone who knows anything about weapons knows that for a chemical weapon you want maximum dispersal - the last thing you are going to do is wrap it in fabric around a human body. And why the air exclusion zone? Were they going to throw the vest at a passing jet? The media never did ask any of those questions...."

"...The political timing could not have been more convenient - a junior minister had resigned over arms to Israel, and the backbench rebellion demanding a recall of parliament over Lebanon will now be containable in the name of standing together in the War on Terror. And the news agenda has been seismically shifted. The public mood is instantly tilted from sympathy for the people of Lebanon, leading to questioning of the War on Terror, to renewed fear that "Islamic fascists" are planning to kill us all...."



Latest London Terror Plot a Blair Hoax?

"...Filed under Aug. 11, 2006 -- UPDATED. According to knowledgeable sources in the UK and other countries, the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor Party revolt, cleverly cooked up a new "terror" scare to avert the public's eyes away from Blair's increasing political woes. British law enforcement; neo-con and intelligence operatives in the United States, Israel, and Britain; and Rupert Murdoch's global media empire cooked up the terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 "Oplan Bojinka" plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad Yousef to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the United States. In the latest plot, it is reported that liquid bombs were to be detonated on 10 trans-Atlantic planes outbound from Britain to the United States....."



U.S. given early warning about plot

Bush: "...The recent arrests that our fellow citizens are now learning about are a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation,'' Bush said after a short walk from Air Force One...."

"The cooperation among agencies within our government was excellent,'' said Bush, maintaining that "this country is safer than it was prior to 9/11. … We've taken a lot of measures to protect the American people, but obviously we are still not completely safe. … It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America.''



CNN's Amanpour Links 9/11 Truthers With Sky Terrorists - Says Muslims, "succumbing to the conspiracy theories"

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | August 11 2006

CNN reporter Christiane Amanpour equated yesterday's alleged sky terrorist liquid explosive plotters with the 9/11 truth movement, the latest brazen attempt to vilify anyone who disagrees with the official 9/11 fairytale.

Here's the quote in full.

"And there is some evidence that is coming out now, five years after 9/11, that many, many Muslims in England and around the world, according to documentaries that have been produced, are really succumbing to the conspiracy theories. They're really now saying that 9/11 was not al Qaeda; it was a U.S./CIA, Mossad/Israel, Zionist plot, basically designed to cause a war against Islam."

Taken on its own, one would think Amanpour was saying Muslims are embracing 9/11 'conspiracy theories,' not necessarily terrorists.

However, viewed in context of the fact that Amanpour made the statement on an Anderson Cooper special entitled 'Sky Terror,' which was solely about yesterday's alleged plot, the intended meaning becomes clear.

'Muslims' is Amanpour's euphemism for terrorists.

Other recent 9/11 hit pieces have slandered the 9/11 truth movement as having a violent extremist undertone. No incidents of violence at any 9/11 truth convergence or protest have ever occurred and organizers consistently advocate purely peaceful demonstrations.

During a recent appearance on Fox News, Newt Gingrich said that opponents of pro-war candidates and their supporters were "insurgents," equating anyone that disagrees with the Bush administration's foreign policy with terrorists.

After making myself a cup of tea I sat down to read my e mail this morning. One individual had taken the trouble to explain his contention with some of the points raised in my articles.

"You should be shot for treason you irresponsible piece of garbage."

The extremist branch of the Neo-Con puss slugs advocate killing people who have a different opinion to the government.

They should no longer be referred to as Neo-Cons - let's call a spade a spade.

They are Neo-Fascists.



Terror Plot Mirrors Bojinka: Run By US Government Agent
"...Associated Press reports that the dastardly new terror plot is a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a 1995 plot to blow up 10 Western airliners simultaneously. What they don't report is that its ringleader - Ramzi Youssef - was protected by the US government in 1992...."

In September of 1992 Youssef entered the US with Ahmad Ajaj. Ajaj's luggage contained documents on how to make bombs and was stuffed with fake passports and ID's.

Ajaj was arrested - amazingly Youssef was released.

Youssef later masterminded the WTC '93 bombing after FBI agents provided the terrorists with real explosives under cover of a supposed sting operation.....



via WhatReallyHappened
Terror Plot Mirrors Bojinka: Run By US Government Agent Associated Press reports that the dastardly new terror plot is a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a 1995 plot to blow up 10 Western airliners simultaneously. What they don't report is that its ringleader - Ramzi Youssef - was protected by the US government in 1992.


Alex Jones: Terror Plot: How Long Before It Turns

Into BS Like Every Other Example?


Kurt Nimmo: Fake Terror Obfuscates Lebanon and Iraq Failures


MI-5 in ludicrous Heathrow terror stunt


( categories: )