DEAR NATHANIEL POPPER:

popper@f...

Oct. 21, 2004

Thank you for the coverage in the article you wrote titled: Some of His Best Friends Are Jewish: The Saga of a Holocaust Revisionist. At the following link:

http://forward.com/main/article.php? ref=popper200410201121

Concerning David Irving, I want to say he has made a tremendous historical contribution by exposing a lot of long held WWII deceptions, and that has obviously earned him a lot of enemies. Not the least of which are the radical Jewish community, who have a lot of WWII skeletons in the closet and want them to remain there.

I would like to say that my site is primarily an editorial site. Where I forward on selections of material that is suppressed for the mass media over fear of the Jewish Lobby. I have a wide and diverse list of busy people who appreciate having access to this 'banned' material. It allows them over a year or two to become much more knowledgeable on these complicated and controversial issues, where well financed disinformation campaigns abound, all designed to hoax the public, which I view as a kind of mass theft of the democracy. http://jahtruth.net/democra.htm

'For example one of the most horrible suppressed stories is the Zionist* participation in the holocaust, which early on was a way to use the Nazis to eliminate their religious Jewish opponents, and then use their deaths as a tool to take over Palestine, one of the most perverse crimes against humanity in modern times.'

* King of kings' Bible - Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Idumeans) the synagogue of Satan. http://jahtruth.net/kofkad.htm

In the future your reporting can go a bit further with Jewish racism, Israeli spying, and Jewish terrorism, such as the JDO. It should get a critical overview by responsible media, such as The Forward newspaper. Or once again, should the public be told what they are allowed to think on these issues, and viciously attacked (with the help of the media) if they disagree.

"Do you think the Jewish Lobby wants their scandals exposed?' Do you think journalists have a duty to do this, like they have in so many other situations? Or should the fear of Jewish Lobby retribution rule the day, which is so well known in the media and academic fields. Their form of beheadings.

My 'questionable website' would not even exist were it not for the censorship of the Lobby skeletons which is acknowledged by just about everybody I talk to, including media people. It is a huge scandal and embarrassing to me as an American to see the country living in such fear of a small group of people with so obviously questionable motives (yes, get this out on the table -- their loyalty).

When France was occupied the Resistance was opposed by other Frenchmen. Those who oppose the occupation of our institutions are likewise opposed by the occupiers and their cronies. It has always been that way. We live in a country where Jews and their major conventions harp on and on about how influential they are, and they excoriate non-Jews for discussing the same thing. It's a shame to the country.

Peace. Michael Santomauro Editorial Director
253 West 72nd street #1711 New York, NY 10023 http://www.RePortersNoteBook.com
212-787-7891

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher, 1788-1860