Gibraltar MessengerFace Mask Madness – Part FourEpisode four of Face Mask Madness has been specifically published on 2nd June 2023 to mark the tenth anniversary of my discipleship with Christ in His Second Coming. With the help of The Gibraltar Messenger Himself, I very publicly throw down the gauntlet and demand, yet again, that the pretend Magistrate Charles Pitto change his mind about denying me a trial by jury of my peers, as is my God given right. I outline my immovable position. This formal short notice will be delivered 28 days before my up-and-coming trial date of 30th June 2023. The consequences of doing this are deemed unpredictable, as I momentarily reflect on what may happen next. Meanwhile, I dare again to mention ‘Sir’ David Steel, who by his actions of late, would appear to view me as a serious threat that cannot even be allowed into his lavish gardens during an annual Convent Open Day. Undeterred by being shunned by the governor, and disinclined to further infuriate The Fuehrer Fabian Picardo, unorthodox attempts are instead made to engage with a bearded Minister of Transport, bicycle-riding Paul Balban, all for the hope of a mere fifteen minute meeting. Messages, with a lot of bottle, are again sent to the Commissioner of The Police, Richard Ullger. While comparisons can be odious, I briefly compare and contrast the policing styles of The Royal Gibraltar Police with the unprincipled and infamous South Yorkshire Police, my former employers from a distant era which started thirty-years ago. It’s fair to say that in certain quarters, the gloves are off, but after all, we are already in World War III. Brief reflections are also made about the local media and the local legal profession here on The Rock. As we further reflect upon The Great Reset of Klaus Schwab and Charles III in action, it’s perhaps well worth remembering that on this day seventy-years ago, the Charles the third’s mother kick-started a Great Deceit of her own by duping the world with a dummy stone for the illicit enthronement on her fake coronation day and subsequent reign of misrule and empire in terminal decline. The Truth will set you free. The “Pitto Protest” Document read in this episode has been submitted to the court. Here is a PDF of the stamped document – Crown v Farrell. For further reference, this episode features these links:
Tony’s JAHTalk Channel – Face Mask Madness – Part Four RELATED: Face Mask Madness – Part Three Face Mask Madness – Part Two Face Mask Madness – Part OneThe post Face Mask Madness – Part Four appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Documentary ‘FINAL DAYS’ Exposes The Evil Scientific Technological EliteFrom the Directors of “Died Suddenly”: “Final Days” Exposes the Evil Scientific Technological Elite and their desire to become gods. The Covid pandemic was the test run for an even more sinister plot to come. “The Satanic Global Elite are playing God and genetically altering humanity forever. Surely, we are living in the final days of humankind,” Stew Peters tweeted. DGTV – FINAL DAYS Karen Kingston writes, “If you saw the film Died Suddenly, there’s a scene where Steve Kirsch says that if people knew what was in the COVID-19 vaccines they would go ______ Basically he said they would freak-out. After investing several thousand hours reviewing and analyzing FDA filings, international and US patents, peer-reviewed papers, US government documents, and Pfizer’s internal research and development reports, I agree with Steve Kirsch. People will freak out once they find out what’s in those vials and understand what the mRNA lipid nanoparticles actually are. Pfizer, US healthcare agencies, government officials, and many leading experts have never been honest with the American people about the contents of the COVID-19 injections; or what the mRNA nanoparticle technologies do to the human body.” – Final Days Sheds Light on the Darkness of mRNA Technologies. Karen Kingston is a med-legal advisor and biotech analyst with 25 years experience. She’s internationally recognized as an expert on the harmful biological effects caused by the mRNA gene editing technologies. Ephesians 5: 11-3 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret. But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. Trust In GOD Not Government, Stew Peters’ Documentary ‘FINAL DAYS’ Exposes The Plan To CORRUPT DNA. Watch The Trailer: DGTV – ‘FINAL DAYS’ Trailer The “SIGNS” of The “END” Times The post Documentary ‘FINAL DAYS’ Exposes The Evil Scientific Technological Elite appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Iran’s newly unveiled ballistic missile triggers alarm in Tel AvivFrom Press TV – The successful test launch of Iran’s indigenously built precision-guided ballistic missile Kheibar earlier this week has caused alarm in Tel Aviv, as it has the capability to evade the most advanced Israeli surveillance means. Jim Kavanagh, a journalist and political commentator, made these remarks in an interview with the Press TV website on Friday, a day after the Kheibar missile, an upgraded version of the Khorramshahr-class missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometers, (1,250 miles), was test-launched. According to Iranian military officials, the missile unveiled on Thursday was one of the most advanced ballistic missiles ever designed by experts at the Aerospace Department of the Defense Ministry. Kavanagh said the 12-minute launch time of the missile means it is “very fast” and “gives little time” for Israeli and American surveillance means, including satellites, “which are constantly aimed at Iran to react in time to prevent a launch”. “Israel is extremely worried about such missiles,” he noted, adding that the regime has been “spoiled with impunity and does not want to lose it”. The American analyst said the Israeli regime and the United States “certainly do not want to wait for Iran to develop solid-fueled long-range missiles that can be instantly launched.” The launch ceremony of the new-generation missile was attended among others by Iran’s Defense Minister Mohammad Reza Ashtiani, who reaffirmed the commitment of armed forces to “defend the country”. Kavanagh said there is a worry that these missiles “can now reach Israeli territory”. “They also, it is reported, have radar-evading capabilities, which make them more likely they will get through air defenses. We must also mention the very important element of accuracy,” he asserted. The US-based commentator further said he has not seen specific information about the accuracy of Kheibar and other newly-developed Iranian missiles, but said there have been huge improvements. “For Israel and its patron, the United States, it is unacceptable that Iran—or any regional actor—would have the ability to inflict serious damage on Israel,” Kavanagh stressed. “Israel must have the capability to inflict any damage it wants on Iran’s cities and facilities—including with nuclear weapons. Iran must not have the ability to inflict any serious damage on Israel with conventional weapons and missiles. That is Israeli and US policy, and they are adamant about it.” Iran has established its reputation as a military heavyweight in the region, developing a wide range of ballistic and cruise missiles in recent years, much to the consternation of Israel and the US. Iran has, however, repeatedly maintained that its missile program is peaceful and defensive in nature. Kavanagh said Iran’s weapons development and the demonstration of greater military capability and confidence has provoked fear in Tel Aviv, as they fear a “few accurate strikes” on Israeli military installations will force the Israeli settlers to “return to the West Bank – of the Hudson”. “It is the capability of these weapons—not Iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons—that Israel and the US are worried about. That is why there will be no return to the JCPOA—because it’s really about the US insisting on limits to Iran’s missile capabilities,” he remarked. Source: Press TV – Iran’s newly unveiled ballistic missile has triggered alarm in Tel Aviv: Analyst Iran Unveils New Ballistic MissileNews Anchor Molly Gambhir: Iran said it will only be used as a deterrant. “And this by the way comes after Israel has shown concerns after a possible war with Iran.” DGTV – Iran unveils new Kheibar ballistic missile RELATED: Iran’s Supersonic Missiles Render Enemy Defences Inoperable for decades Tehran, Moscow, Beijing to create new great power Four Angels of the Euphrates: Syria, Iran, Turkey and IraqThe post Iran’s newly unveiled ballistic missile triggers alarm in Tel Aviv appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Medvedev: There are irreversible laws of warThe deputy head of Russia’s Security Council warned Friday that if the West delivers nuclear arms to Ukraine, Russia would have to carry out a preventive strike. Dmitry Medvedev told reporters in Moscow that the West has been supplying Ukraine with gradually heavier weapons since the beginning of the war last year, when it started sending Kyiv small arms, while now they plan to deliver F-16 fighter jets. “There are irreversible laws of war. If it comes to (supplying Ukraine with) nuclear weapons, it will be necessary to launch a preemptive strike,” he stressed. Medvedev, who served as Russian president in 2008-2012, claimed that the US “earns money” on the conflict in Ukraine, while simultaneously damaging its “centuries-old enemy,” Russia. As for Europe, Medvedev said it “went crazy,” behaving in ways that escalate the conflict in Ukraine. “This conflict (in Ukraine) is very long-lasting … for decades, probably. This is a new reality, new living conditions. Under the Kyiv regime, there will be three years of truce, two years of conflict — and everything will repeat again,” he noted. Source: Top Russian official warns of ‘preemptive strike’ if West gives Ukraine nuclear arms Ukraine conflict could last for decadesOne year on and there isn’t any sign of Ukraine war to end. A top ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that the conflict could continue for decades. Known for making hard line comments, Dmitry Medvedev during his visit to Vietnam said that Ukraine-Russia war will last for a very long time with lengthy periods of fighting interspersed by truces. “This conflict will last a very long time, most likely decades,” Russia’s RIA news agency quoted Medvedev as saying. “As long as there is such a power in place, there will be, say, three years of truce, two years of conflict, and everything will be repeated,” Medvedev further said, reiterating Russia’s claim that Ukraine is a Nazi state. It can be recalled that last month deputy chairman of Putin’s powerful security council Medvedev, described Ukrainian authorities as an infection. Back in January, Medvedev said if Russia were defeated it could trigger a nuclear war. Russia-Ukraine war latest update The battle has intensified in the eastern Ukrainian city of Bakhmut. Meanwhile, the Wagner group has started withdrawing its troops from the region and said that it would hand over positions to the Russian army. The chief of the mercenary group, Yevgeny Prigozhin, said he would return the bodies of a US citizen killed in fighting in Bakhmut and a Turkish citizen found dead in a blown-up building. Meanwhile, the US has imposed sanctions on the head of the Wagner Group in Mali, blaming the Russian private army for trying to obscure its efforts to acquire military equipment for use in Ukraine and of working through Mali and other countries. The US, on the other hand, is developing a coordinated programme to train Ukrainian pilots on the F-16 fighter jets. Source: First Post – Ukraine conflict could last for decades, says Putin’s top ally Dmitry Medvedev F 16 isn’t free, Europe must give $4B for 20 Ukrainian F 16s – USSending F-16s to Ukraine will cost money. This was made clear by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The statement was made during a press conference at the Pentagon on May 25. It was held immediately after the meeting of the contact group in Ukraine. It is about billions of dollars that the countries involved in military support for Ukraine must provide. General Milley did a quick calculation, saying that 10 F-16 fighter jets would cost those supporting Ukraine $2 billion. He stressed that just providing 10 fighter jets costs $1 billion, and maintaining those 10 costs another $1 billion. There is still no clarity on which country will give Ukraine how many planes, the logic is simple: 20 F-16s will cost $4 billion, 30 F-16s will cost $6 billion, etc. Since the USA and European countries alone account for 90% of Ukraine’s aid, it is expected that these countries will provide the funding. Related article: ‘$2B for 10 Aircraft’: Pentagon Looks to Allies to Fund Ukraine F-16 Training NATO not serious enough about risk of nuclear apocalypse — MedvedevVIENTIANE, May 23. /TASS/. The North Atlantic alliance does not take the threat of nuclear war seriously enough, thus making a big mistake, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, said on Tuesday. “NATO is not serious about this scenario. Otherwise, NATO would not have supplied such dangerous weapons to the Ukrainian regime. Apparently, they think that a nuclear conflict, or a nuclear apocalypse, is never ever possible,” he said in an interview with the RT television broadcaster. In Medvedev’s view, NATO is “wrong and at some point events may take a completely unpredictable turn.” “The responsibility will be placed squarely on the North Atlantic Alliance,” he said. As Medvedev pointed out, no one knows whether the point of no return has been passed. “No one knows this. This is the main danger. Because as soon as they provide something, they say: let’s supply this, too. Long range missiles or planes. Everything will be all right. But nothing will be fine. We will be able to cope with it. But only more and more serious types of weapons will be used. That’s what the current trend is,” he concluded. RELATED: West Close to War with Russia NATO Doubles Down for WW3; while Hungary cautions Europe. The Edge of Nuclear WarThe post Medvedev: There are irreversible laws of war appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Why is Russia’s S-350 Vityaz Air Defense System Better Than US-Made Patriot?by Oleg Burunov The Vityaz air defense systems are designed to tackle both ballistic and aerodynamic targets at an altitude of up to 30 kilometers. Russia’s S-350 Vityaz missile system has downed several Ukrainian warplanes and drones in the special operation zone in fully automatic mode, a well-informed source told Sputnik. The source added that “for the first time in the world, the Vityaz performed the automated detection, tracking and destruction of Ukrainian air targets in combat conditions.” What is the S-350 and does it get the better of the US-made Patriot air defense system in terms of performance characteristics? Sputnik explores. What is the S-350 Vityaz?The S-350 Vityaz is a mobile surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, which entered service with the Russian armed forces in 2019. The SAM is designed to destroy both ballistic and aerodynamic targets, which include combat aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cruise missiles, such as the US’ Tomahawks and the UK’s Storm Shadows. The Vityaz system comprises a self-propelled launcher, an all-aspect radar with electronic space scanning, and a command post. The SAM, which is mounted on the special wheeled chassis BAZ-69092-012, can be put on alert in less than five minutes. The system is capable of simultaneously engaging 16 aerodynamic targets and 12 ballistic ones. What is Range of Vityaz Missiles?The S-350 missile system is equipped with the 9M96 and the 9M100 medium and short-range missiles, which are fired via a so-called “cold” vertical launch. When fired, a launch container throws a missile to an altitude of more than 30 meters, turning it towards a target with the help of a gas-dynamic system. The Vityaz system is capable of destroying aerodynamic targets within the range of up to 120 km (74 miles) and at an altitude of up to 30 km (18 miles). As far as ballistic targets are concerned, the figures stand at 30 km and 25 km (15 miles), respectively. Is Vityaz Better Than the Patriot?Moscow-based military expert Alexander Mikhailov told Russian media that despite the fact that the Vityaz can be compared to the US-made Patriot air defense system in terms of performance characteristics, S-350 missiles move faster and are capable of hitting low-flying targets. Namely, he explained, the Vityaz can engage the targets flying at an altitude of ten meters, while the Patriot is unable to shoot down objects moving lower than 100 meters. Will the S-350 Be Upgraded?Another Moscow-based military expert, Yury Knutov, was cited by Russian news outlets as praising the SAM’s ammunition capacity. According to him, just one Vityaz battalion is enough to repel a massive enemy air raid. On the whole, the S-350 Vityaz has great potential in terms of upgrading, given that it was created on the basis of “open architecture,” according to him. “In the future, the system can be improved by means of replacing certain components. This will significantly increase the SAM’s technical capabilities and combat performance. The S-350 is a breakthrough and unique system that only Russia has,” Knutov concluded. Source: Sputnik – Why is Russia’s S-350 Vityaz Air Defense System Better Than US-Made Patriot? RELATED: Ukraine War – It’s Getting Biblical Russia Is Fighting a Battle Against Satan The Law and Preparing for WarThe post Why is Russia’s S-350 Vityaz Air Defense System Better Than US-Made Patriot? appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. The Threat of an Alien/ET-Invasion Is Real
(and this is what you NEED to know about it)
They’ve been with us all along protecting us. For thousands of years our destinies have been intertwined. We’ve been carefully guarded and guided toward one inevitable conclusion, with most never realizing who was really behind it, at least until recently. Their influence cannot be underestimated. We wouldn’t be here without them. If they weren’t intervening and keeping the air breathable, despite humans’ best efforts at polluting and poisoning it, we would all be dead already. The ancient historical records in every culture speak about them. Aliens. Extra-terrestrials. Off-Worlders. Angels. And there are numerous references to them and their flying machines. All through the ages. Their purposes? Primarily peaceful observation thus far. Not only to observe us and monitor our progress (or lack thereof), but also, and perhaps more importantly, so that we may observe them. They’ve sent us many signs and wonders, and revealed themselves to us—more so in the last 70 years than ever before —to get our attention and leave NO DOUBT of their existence. We are definitely NOT ALONE. They’ve provided us with VITAL information and a little bit of technology, in their own way, and left the rest to us. They’ve done this very carefully to preserve our free-will, and to see how we would react to what we’ve been given, and what we would do with it. The hope was that we would learn to use these gifts wisely for our collective benefit, NOT shroud them in secrecy and/or confusion, so that a handful of selfish, evil people could personally enrich themselves and oppress everyone else. But that’s exactly what’s happened, despite all of the precautions taken to prevent it. And perhaps not surprisingly so, since most people on this planet tend to be self-centered, and actually believe we invented all of this tech on our own, because we are so smart and wonderful. It’s the exact same arrogance the ETs have spent thousands of years warning us is detrimental to our existence. The reason why it’s so dangerous is because arrogance not only blinds us to our own ignorance, but also from its very existence. That’s why the arrogance, which is really ignorance, MUST be destroyed before it destroys everything. Why did they choose to reveal themselves to us? Is it not obvious that, when a people think they are the center of the universe—just because they’ve been temporarily granted custody of a relatively minute, controlled environment, for a set period of time—that learning there’s something and someone out there MUCH more advanced than they are should HUMBLE them? Humility is the cure for human ignorance, which is the cause of ALL of our problems. Ignorance, for example, of our own extra-terrestrial origin. We were sent simple, easy-to-follow directions from the ETs, to guard against their information and technology being exploited in this way. These basic instructions warned us that if we didn’t follow them to the letter, we would be oppressed, impoverished and enslaved. That selfish, power-hungry despots would seize the chance to monopolize and manipulate others. And that these same WICKED people in positions of worldly authority would then set up institutions (corporations), and integrate them into society, to mask their criminal activities and enterprises. These institutions may appear, on the surface, to be lawful, but under careful scrutiny they are quickly exposed as the fraudulent corporate rackets they really are. A corporation is a corporate fiction. It is a figment of someone’s imagination, and doesn’t exist except on paper, and in the minds of those who think it’s real. A corporation doesn’t have a corporeal human body, or corpse, it doesn’t have feelings, it doesn’t take responsibility for the actions of its owners, and it has no body or soul. A corporation produces NOTHING. It is the people, who trade their life-energy to the corporate cause, that make the products and provide the services that enrich and empower their corporate owners/masters. Government is a corporation (i.e. a corporate fiction). Organized religions are corporations. And these two institutions are two heads of the same beast-system used to control the masses, and steal from us under false pretenses, while at the same time working together to conceal the existence of ETs and UFOs, in a massive cover-up. The truth is out there, IF one looks in the right place. DGTV – The Way home or face The Fire by JAH The last thing the government and religious leaders of this world want you to know is that not only are ETs and UFOs REAL, but the ETs have sent stern warnings condemning these very same institutions and the people who run them, along with specific instructions on how to get rid of them once and for all, for the benefit of everyone. Governments and organized religions would very quickly be out of business, if this information was clearly understood, so they go to great lengths to keep the masses in the dark. In mid-1947 it was reported that an UFO “crash-landed” near Roswell, New Mexico. Is it just mere coincidence that this 1947 “sign from the heavens” immediately preceded the 1948 formation of the counterfeit-Jewish state in Israel? The ETs have been warning us for at least two thousand years, that this particular event in the Middle East would set in motion a chain of events that will bring about the end of the world as we know it. Fortunately, for the few who survive, it will simultaneously usher in a new age of wisdom; a millennium of freedom and peace under direct benevolent ET rule. If you were among a group of Extra-Terrestrials, Who had sent information CRITICAL to the survival of human+Beings, over thousands of Earth years, in exact and minute detail, to the primitive inhabitants of planet Earth, and they had turned your detailed instructions into nonsensical, ritualistic religious “rites and ceremonies”, so that no-one read and studied the actual information with an open mind, and without applying incorrect preconceived notions, how would you get the attention of those who deserved to SURVIVE? Roswell was only the beginning. There has been an amazing and unprecedented explosion of technology (as well as UFO sightings) over the past 70 years, since Roswell. Coincidence? Transistors (1953). Microchips (1958). Integrated Circuits (1959). Carbon-fiber composites (1961). Communication satellites (1962). LEDs (1962). Kevlar (1965). Cellphones (1973). Personal computers (1977). And GPS (1978), to name a few. The basic building blocks for all modern-day electronics, conveniences and the “space-aged” materials we take for granted today, NONE of which existed prior to the Roswell UFO incident. We often forget how things were before the Internet. Before information was literally at our fingertips. Before the World Wide Web. But even that is just a preview of what’s possible. Instant communication and instant access to information is possible. We have only scratched the surface. Literally. We’ve discovered through the human genome project that there is far more to these organic, biological computing machines that we’re temporarily inhabiting, than previously thought. DNA is actually a highly-sophisticated programming language, written in advanced quaternary rather than binary code by the ETs. And DNA is by far the most efficient means of storing data known to man. In just one gram of DNA, which when dry would occupy a volume of approximately one cubic centimeter, it would be possible to store approximately 250 billion DVDs worth of information. To help put that number into perspective, consider that a stack of 250 billion DVDs would stretch more than 3/4 of the way to the moon. And all of that information could be stored in a single gram of DNA the size of a sugar-cube. Put another way, the DNA information is so densely organized that a single teaspoonful could carry the instructions for building the entire population of planet Earth…hundreds of times over. So we may think we’ve done well packing information densely onto chips, computer hard-drives and DVDs, etc., but all of these devices store information on the surface only. DNA stores information in three dimensions and is by far the densest information storage mechanism known to man. And DNA also has the ability to self-replicate, fix errors, read and copy itself through a process known as transcription. It should be self-evident that we didn’t make these extremely sophisticated human biological machines ourselves, nor did we put them here. That was done for us, for a very specific reason, as explained in great detail by the ETs, beginning on the very first page of their instruction manual. It’s truly a pity so few have taken the time to actually read what they’ve sent us for our own good, but, as the human saying goes, the instructions are routinely only read when all else fails. Humans always think they know better, even in the face of an unquestionably superior intelligence. So why have the ETs done all this? They have a job to do. And that specific job is nearing completion. They’ve basically been baby-sitting this planet for 6000 years, in the hopes of teaching a select few—the VERY small percentage who actually want to learn—what they’ll need to survive once they’re ready to leave Earth. They would like to teach everyone, but most people don’t want to learn from them. Think of this place as a prison-reform school for the criminally-insane, and the ETs as the prison guards and instructors. It shouldn’t be too difficult to understand this is a lunatic asylum, given the lengthy track-record of repeat errors and the human capacity for life-threatening destruction. There will of course be those who disagree, despite the incontrovertible evidence in almost everything humans do. Perhaps the following has escaped the myopic, “blissfully” ignorant:- Thousands of nuclear weapons have been “tested” in the past 70 years. ALL of that radiation is STILL here and its effects are CUMULATIVE. DGTV – A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 – by Isao Hashimoto Hundreds of nuclear power facilities have been built, many on or near known fault-line earthquake zones, KNOWING beforehand there is NO SAFE WAY to dispose of the thousands of tons of nuclear waste they produce ANNUALLY. And again, the effects of ALL of that nuclear waste, regardless of whether it is buried somewhere on land, or sunk to the depths of the sea, are CUMULATIVE. The oil industry has spilled MILLIONS of tons of crude oil worldwide. The sea floor has been ruptured, rivers and streams polluted, and entire ecosystems wiped out, in arguably the most destructive of all industries. And that’s before considering the Kuwaiti oilfield fires during the first Gulf War in 1990-1991, the environmental effects of which, although dispersed, are likewise CUMULATIVE. Advance ET Warnings About the Invasion of Kuwait Global, large fish stocks have fallen over 90% since 1950. Worldwide Decline in Fish Stocks There is talk about reducing the “carbon footprint” of humans while simultaneously removing one of nature’s most efficient natural means of CO2 filtration: trees. Deforestation has already claimed more than half of the world’s rainforests, which are the lungs of this planet, that provide us with oxygen. And increased flooding, erosion and mudslides are also directly attributable to deforestation. ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE: Why it Happens and How to Stop it Humans manipulate genetic codes they likewise don’t fully understand, with devastating results. Crops, animals, water and air are intentionally poisoned with chemicals that are KNOWN to be harmful to all human, plant and animal life. And this crazy, irresponsible behavior is increasing at an exponential rate. How much longer do YOU think the ETs will put up with this destructive treatment of their planet? The Environmental Risks of GMOs These are but a few of the numerous signs of the insanity of this place, before considering such obvious indications like the human penchant for war and destruction, or their insatiable greed. Just look at how humans treat each other. It is routine for people to lie, cheat and steal from each other on a daily basis, and the “elected” leaders are usually the most proficient at these sadistic, evil practices. Sexual perversions of every kind, including the molestation and trafficking of children, are not only tolerated, but encouraged. Violence is rampant. Wars are never-ending. That’s what humans have made of this world. As difficult as it may be, try for just a moment to envision what it would be like to be sane, and look in on a savage, maniacal race hell-bent on their own destruction, while seemingly convinced they are an advanced “civilization”. NONE of these things happen in a truly normal and civilized society, as the ETs have been telling us for millennia. And make no mistake, this type of behavior is NOT TOLERATED anywhere else in the Universe. This isn’t easy for them. Especially after all of their patient and painstaking efforts to rehabilitate human+Beings, and return some measure of sanity to this place. And yes they are fully aware this world is now on the brink of the final, most destructive phase of WW3, just as the ETs already know who will win and lose. Straight from the ETs: Who Will Win and Lose WW3 WW3 is being allowed, to provide us with irrefutable proof of our individual and collective insanity. Why? In the hope we will finally come to our senses and listen to them (the ETs), and ONLY them. The ETs knew it would come to this. We would have too, if we weren’t so self-absorbed. They warned us. They are warning us NOW. WW3. Armageddon. Then the Alien/ET intervention. It’s not a matter of if; it’s a matter of when. Their intervention force is at least twice our global population and their “mother-ship” is of sufficient size that no one will miss it, as it enters Earth’s atmosphere. And the Alien/ET surveillance and tracking capabilities are so far beyond ours, that they will have no difficulty hunting down every single evil human+Being on Earth. So when they arrive there will be absolutely nowhere to run, and nowhere to hide. And that includes the underground facilities that the parasitic criminal class have been building for themselves, for decades. What we’ve been looking at for the past 70 years are their scout-ships. A few small reconnaissance vessels, just to give us a glimpse of what the ETs are capable of, to get our attention, and to prompt us to start doing some soul-searching. Does anyone really believe that these small ships could get this far into space without being part of a convoy? The Alien fleet is coming. In fact the fleet is already here, stationed very near-by and making the final preparations for their ground invasion as this is written, to commence after WW3 and Armageddon have played themselves out. This isn’t what the ETs wanted, but we’ve left them no choice. Contrary to popular belief this is NOT our planet; it is on loan, as is everything on it and in it. And the owners are not going to sit by for much longer while we destroy it, each other, and the rest of the life here that they, the ETs, created. Again, and very predictably, there will be mockers and naysayers. Even now, at the very end, most people will choose to believe their state and religious indoctrination…that we can keep repeating past mistakes and destroying things, including our own life-support system, and everything will be okay…rather than the obvious truth that we are headed in the wrong direction, and need to do an immediate about-face. The classic definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. THINK about it. The truth is this way of “life”, where humans plunder this world’s natural resources for temporary monetary gain and a few creature comforts, is clearly unsustainable. We ARE destroying this planet. And WE ARE ALREADY IN THE MIDDLE OF WW3, which the ETs warned us would start in Iraq. Secular Proof that there Is Indeed an Infinitely Higher Intelligence in The Universe ET Confirmation that WW3 Begins in Syria According to the ETs, BILLIONS of human-lives are about to be lost during WW3. Millions have already been killed or displaced. If you don’t think you will be among the casualties, because your government or organized religion will save you, think again. This will be so brutal, and the devastation so thorough and widespread, that the ONLY thing that will save us from TOTAL ANNIHILATION is an Extra-Terrestrial intervention, as prophesied. THAT is how bad the situation really is. And that’s why the threat of an Alien-Extra Terrestrial invasion is inevitably REAL and IMMINENT and should be welcomed, not feared. For the very few who see the truth in what’s been shared, and recognize Who this message is really from, the next logical step is to finally take the time to read and study the basic instructions our progenitors sent, BEFORE all else fails. Those instructions, which MUST be read with an open-mind, and without ANY preconceived notions, to be properly understood, may be found at the following link:- Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth To keep the evil leaders of church and state from censoring the instruction-manual, parts of it have been written in code and time-locked, awaiting this final Earth time-period. So you’ll need THE KEY to be able to decipher it. Fortunately the ETs have sent that too, as promised, and at just the right time, when it’s needed most. Video link – The Threat of an Alien-ET Invasion is Real The post The Threat of an Alien/ET-Invasion Is Real appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. What is the Fastest Missile in the World
And How Much Does Speed Really Matter?
by Ilya Tsukanov Russia’s Kh-47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic missile made the news this week after destroying a Patriot radar station and five launchers in overnight strikes in Kiev on May 16. How did the Kinzhal get through? What other countries possess ultrafast missiles? Why is it that speed isn’t always everything? Check out our explainer to find out. According to independent US media, the Patriots fired off as many as 32 interceptor missiles at the Kinzhals targeting them in a desperate attempt to intercept them. The Pentagon went into damage control, mindful that admitting the missile defense system’s weaknesses against Russian missiles would undermine global faith in the superiority of US weapons. Patriot missile maker Raytheon saw up to $10 billion shaved from its stock valuation over the news that its coveted weapons system had been hit. US officials claimed the systems were “damaged,” but assured that they had not been destroyed. Ukraine’s military, meanwhile, claimed that it shot down six Kinzhals without losing any Patriots. The Russian military offered no comment. But what else does Russia have in its missile arsenal? What is the Fastest Russian Missile?The Kinzhal is one of the speediest and most advanced missile systems in Russia’s arsenal, but not the only one. The weapon is an air-launched hypersonic missile with a range of between 2,000 and 3,000 km, and a reported speed of Mach 10 (11,925km per hour) or even higher. The Patriot’s interceptors are significantly slower, capable of accelerating to Mach 2.8 (3,340 km/h) in the case of the PAC-1, and Mach 4.1 (5,000 km/h) in the case of its PAC-2 and PAC-3 variants. The Kinzhal is not the fastest missile in Russia’s arsenal, with the strategic RS-28 Sarmat, and the submarine-launched Bulava missiles capable of accelerating to speeds of up to Mach 20 (25,500 km/h) and Mach 24 (28,600+ km/h), respectively. And while these are not hypersonic missiles, but ballistic weapons which travel into space and then release warheads that fall to Earth, they are capable of maneuvering like their hypersonic cousins (Bulavas at their boost stage, Sarmat warheads as they approach targets, or Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles fitted aboard Sarmats), theoretically making their interception impossible. Theoretically, because these weapons have never been tested in actual warfare, and, hopefully, never will, because their use would likely signal the start of a Third World War. When it comes to missiles, speed isn’t everything, and the lower intercept speed wouldn’t be a problem if the Patriot were locking on to a traditional ballistic missile flying on a known trajectory. The problem is, missiles like the Kinzhal are capable of maneuvering in flight, making course corrections to make it more difficult to predict its trajectory and exact course. What is the Number One Fastest Missile in the World?Determining a missile’s maximum speed depends on definitions. As stated above, strategic intercontinental ballistic missiles typically have the highest speed characteristics, with the US ground-based LGM-30 Minuteman having a rating of Mach 23 (28,200 km/h), and the UGM-133 Trident II submarine-launched missile a top speed of Mach 24 in its terminal phase). The Chinese DF-41 ICBM is reportedly capable of flying up to Mach 25 (30,600 km/h), making it perhaps the fastest ballistic missile in the world today. As for hypersonics, the Avangard glide vehicle appears to enjoys the coveted top spot, with a maximum boost speed of up to Mach 27 (32,200 km) in near-space conditions (although this falls to an estimated Mach 15-20 by atmospheric drag on descent). What is the BrahMos Missile, and Does Russia Use It?The BrahMos ramjet supersonic cruise missile jointly developed by Russia and India carries the distinction of the fastest cruise missile in the world, with a top speed of Mach 3.5 (about 4,175 km/h) – fast enough to make short work of enemy vessels and ground-based targets and their air defenses. A new variant of the missile, the Brahmos 2, is under development, with an expected maximum speed of up to Mach 8 (9,800 km/h) thanks to innovative use of a scramjet air-breathing jet engine. The Brahmos 2 is a development of the 3M22 Zircon, a Russian scramjet-powered anti-ship cruise missile which entered into service in January. Why are High Speed Missiles So Important to Russia’s Deterrence Doctrine?Why does Russia seem to be at the top or near the top of most rankings when it comes to the capabilities of its hypersonic, ballistic, and cruise missiles? The answer is simple. Inheriting a massive head-start on advanced missile technology and the blueprints for the earliest hypersonic missiles from the USSR, which began work on them in the late 1960s, while missile tech was one of the areas where R&D investments was not totally curtailed in the 1990s. A Soviet hypersonic missile design displayed at an exhibition staged by the Raduga Design Bureau. File photo.In 2002, after the United States unceremoniously pulled out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, President Vladimir Putin ordered work on existing projects to be accelerated, and for new ones to be laid down, amid concerns that the creation of a US strategic missile defense system could “neutralize and render obsolete our entire nuclear potential.” These efforts bore fruit, and in 2020, Putin said that for the first time in its modern history, Russia had come to possess “the most modern types of weapons, which are far superior in terms of their force, power, speed, and, very importantly, in terms of accuracy compared to all which existed before them and exist today.” These upgrades to Russia’s missile capabilities couldn’t have been more timely, because at the same time that Washington scrapped the ABM Treaty, the Pentagon began working on “Prompt Global Strike” – an ambitious, but highly dangerous, initiative proposing mass precision-guided conventional missile strikes to decapitate adversaries’ political and military leadership and missile deterrents, thus stripping them of the ability to retaliate to aggression. Prompt Global Strike as envisioned in a 2014 MIT presentation.Basically, the possession of ultra-high speed missiles capable of maneuvering, evading missile defenses, and masking their destination provide Russia with a kind of missile “shield,” allowing the country’s leadership to sleep soundly at night in the knowledge that surprise enemy aggression would be met with an inevitable and devastating response – thereby deterring any itchy trigger fingers at the Pentagon and forcing it to keep ideas like Prompt Global Strike on the drawing board. Source: Sputnik – What is the Fastest Missile in the World and How Much Does Speed Really Matter? RELATED: Long Arm of Deterrence: How Far Can Russia’s Nuclear-Tipped Rockets Reach? Russia launches largest submarine to be built in 30 years with enough firepower to take out an entire large city and a fleet of mini-subs to cut undersea Internet cables Gibraltar’s Choices on War Strategies & God’s ProtectionThe post What is the Fastest Missile in the World appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Pathetic – Charles Crowned King of WEF
IS THIS SYMBOLIC?
Long before Charles was “recognized” by the citizens of Great Britain as their sovereign, he was crowned king of the World Economic Forum at its Davos Summit in June 2020. Yes, you can make this stuff up – Charles wore an illuminated rainbow crown at the summit, because their “seemingly” symbolic gestures make it so easy to do so, like with the fleur-de-lis crown remarkably displayed above his body’s head. Interestingly, the fleur-de-lis is a royal heraldry symbol in France and other European nations, which brings remembrance of Charles II, who spent time there after being exiled from Britain. Prevously, his dad, Charles I was accused of treason against England by using his power to pursue his personal interest rather than the good of the country. The charge stated that he was devising “a wicked design to erect and uphold in himself an unlimited and tyrannical power to rule according to his will, and to overthrow the rights and liberties of the people”. He was found guilty of essentially war crimes, and later executed. Then later, Charles II suffered a horrible death. France comes into focus concerning the power-brokers of Britain and Europe – The Rothschilds. Top London bankster Evelyn de Rothschild died in Nov. 2022, but not before he merged the UK and French dynasties. The merging of the UK and French dynasties, and the retirement of Evelyn, meant that other family members have been running this business for some time already, according to the article “Who Runs London’s Rothschild Dynasty?” Who Runs London’s Rothschild Dynasty?A comparison of the three Charleses was already made, and with how history repeats itself, will the nation turn on Charles for his treason like Charles I; or will he suffer a horrible death like Charles II? Ill-Fated CharlesInstead of professing the gospel of Jesus Christ; Charles mimicks Jorge Mario Bergoglio, trying to be all things to all people (Matt. 12:25); which is really a liberal way of pushing the one-world religion that T.H.E.Y. have in the pipelines. All these power players congregate in the same den (Matt. 21:13); spew the same venom (Matt. 23:33); and sit in all the high places (Eph. 6:12). They have been predicting the same future for decades about the environment, whilst looking the other way about their own destructive practices (ie deforestation, mining, genetic-engineered-modifications food, pharmacy, and engineered wars). In fact, all these power players are of one accord; which Philip James brings up in his article, “Charles Preaches WEF Prophecies on Very First Royal Visit,” writing: In his article, Philip James speculated Charles had been captured by Klaus and his cronies, but it’s probably more accurate to say Charles is one of the top cronies. After all, both Charles and Klaus Schwab are credited with jump-starting the Great Reset. According to BBC, “In June 2020, the Prince of Wales and the head of the annual Davos summit launched an initiative calling for the pandemic to be seen as a chance for what they called a Great Reset of the global economy. The other founder of the initiative is Prof Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (WEF), which organises an annual summit in a Swiss ski resort for some of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful people.” It was launched with a video of Charles spewing out their aim of rebuilding from the global COVID-19 crisis using sustainable development goals. On the WEF website: HRH Prince of Wales shared six levers of a Marshall-like plan to tackle climate change and save the environment. In partnership with the WEF, Charles created the Sustainable Markets Council a year before this famous speech, a body charged with encouraging best practice, identifying innovative technologies and linking investors to projects. Charles is just another Davos Man. Prince Charles at the World Economic Forum: “the only limit is our willingness to act” What kind of change do T.H.E.Y. want? Using another play on words, the change is going to usher in Martial Law, techno-style. T.H.E.Y. all talk the same jargon and walk the same road, because the plan is scripted and mapped out. Their plan to Build Back Better – a buzz-phrase used ad nauseum by political puppets all around the world – really comes after a scorched-earth military-type policy. Every aspect of our “normal” way of life is being decimated. And we deserve it, because we refuse to return to God’s Law. Charles and his cronies may just be the the ones to finally turn out enough lights that it gets dark enough that finally a sea of people will rise up and say to this mountain, “fall” (Matt. 21:21). But it looks like some really dark days are ahead. That’s what T.H.E.Y. have in store; and that’s our punishment, especially the United Kingdom’s for humanly crowning a man with Charles’ record. While Charles spoke of WEF prophecies, another prophecy from Nostradamus made recent news: King Charles III to abdicate, this unexpected royal to rule instead: Nostradamus prediction – Texts from the supposed future-seeing 16th-century French astrologist have been interpreted to mean that the newly crowned king will enjoy only a short reign due to his past. Instead, an unexpected successor will be chosen to rule, according to Nostradamus expert Mario Reading, the Daily Star reported. Reading’s interpretation of Michel de Nostredame’s visions also claims that fallout from a stain on Charles’ past will come back to haunt the king and influence him to leave the throne. “Prince Charles will be seventy-four years old in 2022, when he takes over the throne, but the resentments held against him by a certain proportion of the British population, following his divorce from Diana, Princess of Wales, still persist,” he wrote. Mario Reading is most likely referring to this Nostradamus Quatrain 10,22: Quatrain 10,22 This Nostradamus prediction has been featured on JAHTruth for decades: The Prophecies of Nostradamus about Inis Fail (Ireland), The Lia Fail (Stone of Destiny) and The Ark of The Covenant. In fact, here is the interpretation of the said Quatrain: Quatrain 10,22 Quatrain 3, 47 Now, that it’s 2023 and with the current situation, it seems the monarch who will be driven out by force will be Charles Windsor. Who knew Elizabeth would be allowed to reign as long as she did? Father did. All in Good Timing. For the past quarter of a century, JAH has been warning us to Return to God’s Law, or burn. He challenged our modern-day Jezebel-Elizabeth; and in this time, a lot of groundwork has been done to wake the nation. And what we know of past prophets, the nation is given ample time to change its ways – take Jeremiah’s warnings for instance. How many times did he write the nation? And how many times did they ignore him; including imprisoning him, because they just didn’t want to hear it? The time is at hand. We can look at the Nostradamus prophecy, but more importantly we have the sure word of God through Ezekiel about the final overturn of The Stone (Ezek. 21:27); and the sure word of EliJAH that its completion is near. Nostradamus predicted the monarch would seek safety in Greece, which seems to be aligned with Charles’ affection for his dad’s ancestral country.
As per above, in 2021, Charles and Camila partied on a Rothschild yacht off the coast of Corfu. Charles also wants to preserve his dad Philip’s ancestral home in Greece. But the Greek-Orthodox monastery (Mount Athos) that he’s fond of might make the list of possible hide-outs if Charles were to seek refuge in Greece – which in itself would be ironic – seeking safety with devout Catholics “after” professing to being a devout protestant at his coronation. King Charles’ Mysterious Links to the Greek Orthodox Faith It seems as though Charles would rather be at the Greek Rock of Mount Athos; instead of at The British Fortress of Rock – Christ’s Rock of Defence, missing his opportunity to meet The Real King (Matt. 7:23). Here’s another thought: if Charles has had undisclosed visits to Greece, who’s to say Elizabeth didn’t have undisclosed travel there, or to other parts of the world, for that matter. In the end, none of their travels and hide-outs matter – the Windsors were dethroned by God in 1950, in preparation for the fulfilment of prophecy – He is going to give Christ The Throne of David. And just like David was picked over Saul, a worthy replacement with “no mark of a king”, as Nostradamus puts it, will replace Charles. Back to Charles “Inclusiveness” –Trying to be all things to all people is possibly just a strategic move to dupe as many people as possible – as news has just been published that Harold Brooks-Baker of Burke’s Peerage said Charles was a descendant of Muhammed (peace be upon him) – WEF “Great Reset” King Charles Boasts He Is Direct Descendant of Muhammad. It just seems like a pope-ish kind of move to rally everyone under a one-world religion, with Charles as some sort of saviour, engaging all faiths. No one can fault Charles for being interested in Islam, but he’d do well to note that Gabriel gave The Koran to Muhammad; and in it, Muslims were instructed to abide by God’s Law – found in The Torah, also known as the first five books of The Bible (Sura 32:23). After a 2013 report of his attraction to Islam, “Why is Prince Charles so attracted to Islam?” Charles was written about The Koran’s inclusion in The King of kings’ Bible, which has the power to unite Muslims, Christians and Jews under God’s Law. Since Charles is actually a real descendant of king David, he should have studied The Law. In fact, he just took an Oath to Maintain it. He’s not going to any more than Elizabeth did. Charles is going to maintain the goal of the Great Reset. He doesn’t want to save Britain, he wants to save Earth from humans. It’s no secret Charles thinks the world is overpopulated; something he has gone on about for decades. Speaking as part of the Sky series “After The Pandemic: Our New World {Order}”, Charles said, “We need to put Nature at the center” (min-1:53). One would think that a Christian would say that “We need to put Christ at the center.” As a descendant of king David, Charles could even say “We need to put Father at the center.” Nope, he said “nature”, which pleases the pagans – who by the way loved his invitation with the green man at the bottom [A coven of British witches and pagans pledge their allegiance to King Charles, claiming he is ‘very pagan’ and ‘supportive’ of their beliefs]. Are they reading into this? Possibly, but we shouldn’t ignore the plan that in order to unite everyone into a one-world-order-religion, you’ve got to put up a pretence that you can be everything to everybody. Worshippers of Gaia would even be pleased; but God isn’t. On one shoulder, we have Charles whispering in our ears about a global plan. On the other shoulder, we have EliJAH, saying, remember and return to The Law (Mal. 4:4). It really can’t get any clearer or decisive than these two choices. Even Sky News Australia is warning us – Be wary of King Charles III’s dangerous ambition to ‘reset’ society in the name of climate change activism – The ‘Great Reset’ initiative, which was launched by the now-King Charles himself in June 2020, seeks to change society into a worrying form of neo-feudalism. Dealing with climate change is intensely political. Its ideology that calls for massive government meddling in the economy, regardless of the negative consequences. The WEF would move it to a form of neo-feudalism, in which governments would collude with the private sector to facilitate a “reset” of capitalism, and supposedly fight climate change. Charles is a staunch advocate of the Great Reset; yet cunningly portrays himself as a saviour of the environment. This is again ironic given he makes enormous profits off destroying the world; or that he could single-handedly end poverty by declaring a true Biblical Jubilee (Lev. 25:9-19), and not the costly, pompous ones celebrated by Elizabeth. Instead of prophesying about the WEF agenda, Charles should take a good long study of prophecies about the United Kingdom – and his reign. He can start by examining the British heraldry symbols, not of a fleur-de-lis, but of a lion and a unicorn. Also, instead of learning Greek or Arabic, he should have learned the words of the New Song. Charles Can Not Serve Two Masters (Matt. 6:24). A House Divided Will Fall (Matt. 12:25). When they wrote the Great Retraction Letter, Justin Walker (Hardwich Alliance) and William Keyte (Common Law Constitution) afforded Charles the benefit of the doubt, that he was unknowingly a part of the evil Great Reset Plan, and called for him to Retract from the Great Reset – which they said was unconstitutional based on the Magna Carta. This was probably just a nice way to offer Charles an out, without an outright accusation against him. Now, that Charles is demonstrably fully embracing the WEF mission, what will Walker and Keyte do? At this point, let’s just call a spade a spade. Charles can’t be distanced from The Great Reset, because publicly he launched it, essentially taking a blood oath with the Satanic Plan. Charles isn’t going to sacrifice his Great Reset Ideology, he’s going to sacrifice the British Nation. And who can he please by doing this? Luciferians. Biblical prophecy states that the British Throne will grow dark and the Commonwealth won’t reflect its light anymore. Charles is fine letting countries and territories divorce from the United Kingdom. Why? If you thought you were king of the world, as offered by Lucifer, would it really matter? If Charles and his group already control the entire world, who cares how commonwealth countries identify themselves, because their identities will be absorbed into the coming technocracy. Ezekiel’s prophecy does say “prince” not “princess”; and the final overturn of The Stone started on George VI’s watch; and will end on Charles’ watch. The last 70 years under Elizabeth’s reign just wasn’t dark enough. Still today – people are clinging to some false hope that things will turn back to normal – to the way they used to be – that this nightmare will end. It’s not going to end. Charles has embraced the Change of the Guard. He’s no more a Defender of The Faith than Judas himself. He has sold the British Nation for how much? 30 Trillion – would that be the going rate now? It’s not even about the money, it’s about the power – “I’m king of the world!” he might have said to himself, as he ever so-slightly grinned when king Edward’s crown was placed on his head during the ceremony. And as king, he could easily bring in the New Great Reset Order under the guise of his so-called environmental persona. HINT: It’s not working, despite the mainstream media’s cover stories. In truth, Charles is an emperor with no clothes. The writing is on the wall: Mene, mene, tekel, uparsin – God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end. You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting. DGTV – Great Reset | Charles | We have no alternative “Unless we take the action necessary, and build in a greener and more inclusive and sustainable way, then we will have more and more pandemics,” said Charles. Telling us what T.H.E.Y. have planned, Charles said “we have no alternative”. This is a lie. We have a good alternative in this plan: Green Sustainable Economics: A Phase of Divine Law. More importantly, we have his replacement in The Healing Wings of King Christ. We are counting down the numbered days. The fake-coronation was allowed, which means that it is not dark enough yet. Charles is being allowed to bring in the darkest hour for the British Nation with the planned adoption of The Great Reset; where the people will be downsized, correlated, locked in zones, bankrupt spiritually and financially – oppressed like they have never known (Matt. 24:21). Everyone who has sworn allegiance to Charles is a traitor. From the coronation attendees who yelled “God save the king”; to the crowds celebrating in the streets; to all those lukewarm individuals sitting on the fence. The acceptance of Charles as their personal king proves The British Nation should be punished to the full force of The Law. The pomp, the ceremony, the ritual demonstrated to the world that the British people would choose Charles over Christ. This stands as a record against them. Prophetic – Thou [art] My Son; this day have I created for thee:PSALMS 2 The post Pathetic – Charles Crowned King of WEF appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Ukraine’s Depleted Uranium Blast: Europe on Brink of Environmental DisasterSputnik News – Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev warned on Friday that a radioactive cloud was heading towards Western Europe following the destruction of a Ukrainian warehouse storing British-supplied depleted uranium ammunition. From TASS – Nikolai Patrushev also accused the US of manipulating its allies to provide “help” to other nations that results in harm being done to the recipients. “They ‘helped’ Ukraine too, by putting pressure on their satellites and supplying depleted uranium munitions. Their elimination has caused a radioactive cloud that is now moving towards Western Europe. An increase in radiation levels has already been registered in Poland,” Patrushev warned. Sputnik News spoke with Dr. Chris Busby, physical chemist and scientific secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, about how the West’s decision to provide depleted uranium (DU) ammunition to Ukraine has potentially caused a continent-wide ecological disaster. Below is his answer in full. Recently, several web media outlets provided videos of an enormous explosion in the town of Khmelnitski, located to the West of Kiev, and about 200 km from the border with Poland. There were two major explosions which produced a massive roiling swirling fireball which, like an atomic bomb, developed upwards and formed a mushroom cloud, which was black. I have represented nuclear atmospheric test veterans in the Royal Courts of Justice in London and have seen many films of nuclear explosions: this was not one. A nuclear explosion is characterised by an immediate intense white light which wipes out the camera film or detector. So, what was it? It was suggested by several commentators that an arms depot that had been hit contained the Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons sent by the UK to the Ukraine for use in the British Challenger tanks as anti-tank penetrators. That the explosion was one involving the burning of the DU in the fireball. Since I am a scientific authority on Uranium and its health effects, but have also examined its dispersion and behaviour in the environment, I will comment on what I believe happened, and why it is important. I was a member of the UK government Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium Oversight Board (DUOB) in 2000-2005, and also the UK government Committee Examining Radiation Risk from Internal Emitters (CERRIE) 2000-2004. I am Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) which is an independent NGO that provides advice on risk from ionising radiation. Matt. 24:22 And EXCEPT those days should be shortened, there should NO flesh be saved (2 Esdras 16:28): but for the Elect’s sake those days SHALL be shortened (by The Ruler of The Universe). – Signs of the End Times My main research interest in this area is Uranium and health, particularly the DU particles, which are so small they act as a gas and move over very large distances once they are created by the burning of DU. I found them in England in 2003 after they had come from Iraq. I found them in 2023 in England after they came from the Ukraine war. So that is the first thing: the material is able to travel very large distances. Therefore, if the Khmelnitsky explosion was a DU one, the material would move with the wind direction and should be detectable at monitor sites downwind. Rev. 9:18 By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone (sulphur), which issued out of their mouths. First, we need to say that DU has a gamma signature, it releases gamma rays. The UK and USA governments lie about this. They point to the fact that the U-238, that remains after the fissile U-235 is removed in the centrifuges (and is sent off for nuclear weapons and reactors), is a weak alpha emitter. They say that alpha radiation cannot penetrate skin and so the DU itself is harmless. That it cannot be detected by a Geiger Counter and the alpha particles don’t make it through the window. There is, of course, a health problem if the post-impact particles are inhaled and pass into the body through the lung into the lymphatic system or directly into the digestive system, but essentially DU is harmless. What you need to know is that Uranium 238, when it decays with its alpha emission, turns into Thorium-234 and Protoactinium-234m which then turns into Uranium 234. Thorium 234 is a beta and gamma emitter delivering 6% of its decay energy as a gamma ray. Thus, large clouds of DU particulate aerosol will be detectable by gamma detectors. When I visited Iraq with Al Jazeera in 2000 I went to the south and examined the corpses of the tanks that had been hit by DU in the first Gulf War (Fifth Trumpet of Revelation). Some of the A-10 DU penetrators were still lying around. They gave off an intense gamma ray signal, and the holes in the tanks were highly gamma ray active. So much for only an alpha emitter. I am a yachtsman: examination of the UK metereological weather pressure maps tell us that at the time, and for days after the explosion, there was an anticyclone to the North of the explosion site and winds were weak but from the South East blowing North Westerly around the high-pressure area. So, the plume would move towards Poland. If the winds were about 5km/h they would reach any Poland detectors 250 km away on the 15th. After Chernobyl (Third Trumpet of Revelation), the European Union set up a Europe-wide gamma radiation detector system that used to give gamma readings in real time. I went to look. But astonishingly, all the data was blocked. The web- based system, administered from Germany, (EURDEP) would not provide the detector maps that are normally available. Luckily, there were some location maps on the web and some that had been already downloaded by colleagues of mine before the system stopped working. I obtained maps from Poland. One of these I show below. You will see that a very highly significant increase in gamma radiation occurred at this detector, north west of the explosion site almost exactly when it would be expected on the basis of a distance of 250km and a mean wind speed of 5km/h. The increase, from 60nSv/h to 90nSv/h was highly statistically significant about 50%. Other detectors all across Poland showed an increase*, as the plume passed over them, the increase being weaker the further away (due to dispersion of the plume). Later, the Poles measured the increase at the Marie Curie Institute in Lublin, but their map was a more sophisticated one and needed some expert interpretation. The Polish map gave gamma increases split into two natural isotopes, Bismuth and Thallium, also total gamma and cosmic ray gamma. From the map, we are to assume (and this was the implicit message) that the gamma peak was due to Bismuth. Enter Sherlock Holmes. Bismuth 214 is a Radon daughter. The natural background radioactive gas Radon (Rn-222) is always present, since it is produced from Uranium and Radium in the ground. If there is a sudden change in atmospheric pressure, or when it rains, there is a gamma peak from Radon, which shows itself as the Bi-214 peak. So, the Poles seem to be implying that the increase in gamma radiation is normal and nothing to get scared about. Many have picked up on the Bismuth spectrum. But the way in which the Polish graphs are presented is misleading. The problem with a radon argument is first that the gamma increases go up all across Poland at a time scale that identifies a plume from Khmelnitsky and second that there was a stable anticyclone weather system and no atmospheric pressure changes that might pull radon out of the ground. I checked all that. There was only some light rain over Lublin. There is, however, an additional possibility. Very fine particles attract Radon: you get a slight increase in gamma from Radon near factory chimneys that emit fine particles. The European radiation detector system web map came back online on May 18. The map type had been changed and everything we saw in the downloads had disappeared or had been smudged out by data analysis averaging. Why? This, and the early blocking of access to the site suggest panic and cover-up. So taken all together, what we see is a massive explosion which is thought to be DU, and reports of a spike in gamma radiation near the site. Uranium oxide is black, and the black plume moves north west slowly, the weather pattern is stable and the wind blows to Poland. The Polish EU detectors all show gamma radiation increases at the expected time of arrival of the plume. The EU detector system is shut down rapidly, but not before we have obtained data from several sites. The Poles provide a detector result that identified Bismuth as the cause of the increase, but do not go so far as to formally state that it is (in case of later blowback). One final piece of evidence. We see videos on the internet of the Ukrainians clearing up the explosion site using Robot vehicles, not ordinary firemen. Why do they need Robot vehicles? The last times we saw Robot vehicles clearing up was in the ruins of Chernobyl and Fukushima. If I am right, there has been an environmental disaster, and the DU particles will travel across Poland, Germany and Hungary, and will end up in the Baltics, probably later the whole of Europe including the UK (after all, the Chernobyl Uranium particles came to the UK). They will deliver genetic damage and death like that seen in the Balkans and Iraq. Cancer, birth defects, miscarriage, infertility, lung damage, mental problems (Gulf War Syndrome) and so forth. The scientific and epidemiological evidence on this has been clear since the Gulf War. It is all there in the scientific literature—but the governments in the West and the military ignore it, deny it and cover it up. In the case of the UK coroners court finding for Stuart Dyson, the jury found that DU caused his fatal colon cancer. But when the coroner wrote to the health minister (as he had to by UK law, Rule 43) the reply was: we disagree. This stuff can be measured, but no one will measure it, or if they do, they will be attacked and their arguments dismissed. Even if I am wrong, and there is some other explanation for the gamma peaks, DU must be banned. It is a weapon of indiscriminate effect and kills civilians, the enemy and your own troops (well, Ukrainian troops). It is much worse than a war gas, like Sarin, or phosgene, mustard gas or all the other chemical agents banned by civilisation. This stuff destroys the genetic basis of life itself. And no one does anything. Those who use it base their action on obsolete science supported by dishonest epidemiology carried out by dishonest scientists and obsolete and fantastical risk models. Those who provide the weapons, the UK government in this case, are morally bankrupt. Unless it is their intention to destroy the Ukrainian people. Who knows anymore? The world has gone mad. *Poland’s National Atomic Energy Agency claims there is no increase in radiation levels Source: Sputnik News – Ukraine’s Depleted Uranium Blast: Europe on Brink of ‘Environmental Disaster’ TruNews examines the news – The Sixth Trumpet of Revelation – World War 3. The post Ukraine’s Depleted Uranium Blast: Europe on Brink of Environmental Disaster appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Unlawful Killing of Diana and DodiUnlawful Killing is a 2011 British documentary film, directed by Keith Allen, about the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed on 31 August 1997. It argues that the British and French authorities covered up uncomfortable facts about the crash; and implicates the royals in orchestrating the murder of Diana and Dodi. It also alleges that Diana’s life could have been saved had she been taken to hospital quickly and efficiently, and condemns the inquest into her death for failing to investigate why this action was not taken. Diana was 36 years old when she was killed; and her death sparked an outpouring of public grief in the United Kingdom and worldwide. Still today, the circumstances of her death haunts us. The truth about Diana’s killing will persist until true justice is served. Dodi Fayed’s dad, Mohamed Al-Fayed, claimed that the crash was a result of a conspiracy, and later contended that the crash was orchestrated by MI6 on the instructions of the Royal Family. Keith Allen’s Unlawful Killing was produced by Mohamed Al-Fayed’s London-based production company, Allied Stars. Why would he spend millions to produce and promote a documentary on the suspicious circumstances surrounding their deaths? Keith Allen, points out how “chillingly convenient” it was for the Windsors that the crash happened when it did. The documentary provides fairly damning evidence that Diana and Dodi were murdered by the British ‘elite’, with the support and connivance of their French counterparts. Circumstances involving their deaths were revived in 2013, surrounding the claim by a SAS sniper that the “SAS was behind Princess Diana’s death”. The Sunday Times reported on 29 January 2006 that agents of the British secret service were cross-examined because they were in Paris at the time of the crash. Eventually, the media dismissed the story; and falsely claimed the investigation was conclusive – the crash was an accident. Repeatedly proven, the media’s real job is to catapult the propaganda that the elite hope is the accepted ‘reality’, espcially if they repeat it often enough; and censor anything evidence to the contrary. Critical of Britain’s royal family, it wasn’t allowed to air in the UK, unless 87 cuts were made. The consensus among the great British and world public seems to be that Diana and Dodi and their driver Henri Paul died as a result of an accidental car crash. However, because English law requires an inquestd in cases of sudden or unexplained death, one was conducted. The jury in the official 3-month-long inquiry into their deaths returned a verdict of “unlawful killing”. The film starts by showing a letter from Diana, hand-written to her butler, predicting her own violent death. It says, “My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car. Brake failure & serious head injury.” Less than two years later her prediction came true. The documentary mainly focuses on the inquest, which was called to examine the suspicious circumstances surrounding the car crash. This inquest was dismissed by several speakers in the film as a cover up. They criticise that Charles, in spite of being implicated by Diana’s letter as trying to kill her exactly the way she died, wasn’t required to appear as a witness. At the end of the inquest, the jury had heard so much suspicious information that the coroner heading the inquest could not take any risk. In his three day instructions to the jury, he told the jury to ignore the eye-witness statements and forbid the jury to even consider the possibility of murder. The jury, however, ignored the coroners instructions and spent a whole week to carefully examine the evidence for themselves. And concerning media reports, they were only interested in information confirming the “established consensus” previously touted as reality. The British media misrepresenting the inquest’s verdict – in a massive world-wide misinformation campaign led by the BBC – said that it was the following paparazzi who caused the crash. What the inquest actually established was that the vehicles surrounding Diana’s car in the tunnel caused the accident. When their Mercedes entered the tunnel, they were surrounded by four motorcycles and a white Fiat Uno. The prime suspect to have caused the crash is the driver of the Fiat Uno, but neither the English nor the French police were able to identify him; and yet one of the best known paparazzi, James Andanson, with connections to secret services, drove exactly that kind of car. He was not part of the paparazzi crowd waiting in front of the Ritz hotel. None of the other vehicles got ever identified. The most bizarre circumstance of the accident was probably the behaviour of the ambulance. Why did it take over 2 hours to get Diana to a near-by hospital? If she had received prompt hospital treatment, the expert witnesses at the inquest all agreed, Diana would have survived. 14th February 2023 Other notable details revealed in the documentary include:
The film goes on to ask why the British people still tolerate the monarchy. It accuses British officials of corruption because they were more loyal to the monarch than to the people and care more about earning a knighthood than obeying the law. Why would the Brisith people tolerate and accept a Profane Wicked Prince as their souvereign, choosing to allow the public-concensus outwardly about Diana’s death, yet somehow quietly sensing something nerfarious lies beneath all official records of it. The acceptance of both will contribute to Britain’s downfall. Because Unlawful Killing was censored, it became one of Muad’s Ripple Effects to ensure it was seen. He entitled it The Windsors Ripple Effect: Unlawful Killing. If you havne’t seen it please watch and share it: Please also read Was Diana’s Extremely Convenient Death an Accident? and The Truth about The British Monarchy. RELATED: PROFANE WICKED PRINCE CHARLES – your day is come.The post Unlawful Killing of Diana and Dodi appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Face Mask Madness – Part ThreeIn this third episode of Face Mask Madness on The Rock, I use the following four farcical fabled stories to “unkindly” square-up traitorous activities on The Rock of Gibraltar during the Covid era: Within Morrisons Superstore, more treasons of a Covidian kind are uncovered to prick the conscience of The Rock’s very own masked-up head nurse, Sandra Gracia. Above the Convent building, “wild-bell” reasons opposing facemask mandates are resounded to unsettle the steely nerves of the governor, Sir David. Upon glossy creative Coronavirus laminates, artistic license is unleashed to lambast the unlawful Big Pharma wheeler-dealer antics of chief minister, Fabian Picardo. And inside New Mole House Police HQ, a nurse’s powerful letter is dispatched to compare Covid guidelines to acts of terrorism to keep awake at night, the top cop on The Rock, Richard Ullger. The letter is featured in this article: MUST READ: “By Complying with the COVID-19 Guidelines I Would Be Participating in Terrorism” – VA Nurse Sends Out Letter and Compared the Guidelines as an ‘Act of Terrorism’. Ring Out Wild Bells, or a hidden message in a bottle. Tony’s JAHTalk Channel – Face Mask Madness – Part Three RELATED: Face Mask Madness – Part Two Face Mask Madness – Part One Gibraltar Commissioner of Police Should Stop Acting and Start ArrestingThe post Face Mask Madness – Part Three appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Face Mask Madness – Part TwoIn the second episode of Face Mask Madness, I tell of the ludicrous nature of three other close encounters of the mask-less kind on The Rock. These were Covidian brushes I have had at the hands of the Royal Gibraltar Police, and a knife crime incident notwithstanding. I expand upon the peculiar circumstances of my unlawful arrest which ultimately led to my unlawful imprisonment for contempt of court before the Magistrate Charles Pitto. In turning my thoughts towards my up-and-coming trial, I touch on the thorny issue of the medical tyranny within our midst in Gibraltar. I explain how my clarion call for the Commissioner of Police Richard Ullger to arrest the real criminals for crimes against humanity, kind of backfired on me. The RGP took an altogether different approach. They incisively called time on my five arrest warrants which had been outstanding for over 550 days; and rather than arrest the real criminals, they arrested me. I wanted justice. Perhaps, they wanted to send me a message. Far from deflated by this sudden turn of events, encouragement is taken from the police tactics as my thoughts turn towards my trial on 30th June 2023, while not yet abandoning hope of getting the trial before a jury of my peers as is my right under Magna Carta. Tony’s JAHTalk Channel – Face Mask Madness – Part Two RELATED: Face Mask Madness – Part One Intelligence Report on MISPRISION of TREASON Gibraltar Commissioner of Police Should Stop Acting and Start Arresting Policing The Corona State by Tony Farrell in GibraltarThe post Face Mask Madness – Part Two appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Global Britain and Charles’ Great Resetby Matthew Ehret The world was exposed to a disturbing, archaic and bizarre bit of pageantry not seen in over 70 years with the coronation of Charles as head of the Global British Commonwealth, head of the Anglican Church, and spokesman for a program dubbed Global Britain that was brought online as the official mandate of the Conservative party in 2021. From managing a global empire of economic enslavement and having invaded nearly every nation on Earth at one time or another[2], Britain continues to exert vast control over the mining concessions of Africa with over $1 trillion of direct mining interests controlled by British and/or British Commonwealth-based corporations. According to the 2016 report produced by War on Want[3]: “101 companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) — most of them British — have mining operations in 37 sub-Saharan African countries. They collectively control over $1 trillion worth of Africa’s most valuable resources. The UK government has used its power and influence to ensure that British mining companies have access to Africa’s raw materials. This was the case during the colonial period and is still the case today.” The CityAs outlined in my new book The Anglo Venetian Roots of the Deep State, the “square mile” dubbed The City of London (a separate legal entity from London itself) is the nerve center of world finance, with the Bank of England and Commonwealth offshore tax havens directing trillions of dollars of drug money laundering, terrorist financing and other corrupt practices globally. The City’s sovereignty beyond all national jurisdiction was enshrined in the oligarchist ‘Magna Carta’ of 1214 which established the financial hub as a supranational corporation capable of running its own police force and judicial system… which it continues maintain 800 years later. During the 183 years between 1763 to 1946 which saw the greatest direct influence of British unipolar supremacy over the world, the impoverished nations of the world found themselves more impoverished, less capable of acquiring means of industrial production and more at war with themselves and their neighbors via divide-to-conquer tactics. Since this empire took the form of the Anglo-American “special relationship” after 1945, this trend was only exacerbated. The Causal Hand of British IntelligenceFrom the standpoint of global intelligence operations, Britain is the creator and central command structure of the Five Eyes intelligence apparatus and has also been dubbed “Londonistan” for having provided safe havens for international terrorist groups who have found sanctuary under the liberal surface ideology of tolerant Britain[4]. British intelligence has also been found to have either helped create and/or continued to support terror groups internationally as outlined by EIR researcher Michael Billington in the 2020 report British Creation and Control of Islamic Terror: Background to China’s Defeat of Terror in Xinjiang[5]. While nurturing global terrorism and radical Islam, British intelligence also lost no time cultivating the most rabid variants of political zionism, and crafted the state of Israel itself out of the Roundtable/Fabian program that came to be called ‘The Balfour Accords’. The story of Britain’s creation of political zionism and rapturist Christianity too is outlined in a 2021 episode of The Great Game here: The Strategic Hour: Wuhan Labs, Zionism, Rapture and the Creation of Synthetic Cults (1.5-hour video). While China has provided large scale loans for transport corridors, new industrial zones, and coal, oil, natural gas, hydro and nuclear power investments to countries desperately in need of real development, Global Britain and her American/EU cohorts have spent decades only providing conditionality-laced loans with strings attached and “appropriate” green technologies that will forever prevent Africa or other poor nations from ever standing on their own two feet. The idea of Global Britain has always had at its heart the concept of an integrated British Commonwealth with the Five Eyes at the head of intelligence, City of London at the head of finance and the hereditary structures of power centered around the Crown as the titular fount of all honors through which all branches of the international deep state derive their powers. Crown AgentsSince 1833, Global Britain has been managed by a pseudo private system of Crown Agents today named Crown Agents for Overseas Government and Administration. This vast body exists as a semi-official status and describes itself as “an emanation of the crown” and is extremely active in Central and Eastern Europe with its greatest focus on Ukraine’s economic, energy and health management system. The agency is partnered with the World Bank, UN and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and acts as a giant holding company with one shareholder called the Crown Agents Foundation based in Southwark London. Having been set up in the 1930s as the new face of the British Empire, today’s British Commonwealth occupies 12.2 million square miles of territory, holds 2.4 billion people and represents 21% of the world’s land area. For those who still believe in the myth that the British Empire disappeared after WW2, it is worth contrasting both Commonwealth and Empire maps. The fact is that the British Empire continues to exert a vast top-down influence over world affairs. Despite having nominally disappeared after WWII, giving way for an “American Empire”, Global Britain is simply an attempt to make explicit what has always been true. Today’s strategists managing the Global Britain agenda “coming out party” are in a desperate attempt to position the Commonwealth as the center of a new post-reset age. Being an institution organized entirely around hereditary institutions, the centrepiece for the continuity of this reform is hinged upon a ruling family occupying the position of official Prima inter pares around which the entire structure of controls can exert its influence. In today’s age, this role has fallen onto a certain inbred creature by the name of Charles. “Long Live the King”“London Bridge is Down” were the code words delivered by the Elizabeth’s Private Secretary Edward Young to high-ranking officials upon the death of Elizabeth II. This code was selected as part of a larger protocol dubbed strangely enough “operation Unicorn” for reasons beyond the wildest imagination of this author and which sets into motion a set of actions culminating in the anointing of Prince Charles as the new King of Britain and the Commonwealth. Biblical Code Words: For Canadians who had thought they would no longer be forced to endure watching their Prime Minister slavishly declare his oaths of fealty (and oaths of secrecy) to an inbred monarch sitting on the other side of the ocean as had occurred in 2017 they will be very disappointed. Canada’s Parliamentary Oaths Act of 1866 demands that both houses of Parliament are required to take pledges of allegiance after the deaths of all sitting monarchs. That’s right, every single member of the supposedly “elected and democratic” government of Canada must declare their oaths of fealty not to the people or non-existent constitution, but to some inbred family bloodline on the other side of the world. Similar oaths were read by elected officials across every other Commonwealth Five Eyes member state. It is thus worth asking, is this institution of hereditary powers which Charles has inherited just a ceremonial gig with no real substance or influence behind it? Although the majority of citizens including British subjects believe this to be the case, the facts point to a very different reality. Prince Charles: World’s Largest Property OwnerThis may surprise you, but the British Crown happens to be the world’s largest property owner clocking in possessions amounting to 6.6 billion acres across Australia, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, Canada, Great Britain and the Falkland Islands[6]. On top of the “Crown Lands” and “Crown Corporations” which are legally owned by the monarch of Britain, an organization called ‘The Crown Estate’ is one of the world’s largest property groups. Describing the institution which sends 25% of its earnings directly into the Monarch’s purse every year, Die Welt Business had this to say[7]: Read more: Charles III, Real King or Servant of the Globalists? “The Crown Estate owns property all across the UK, from castles and cottages to agricultural land and forests plus retail parks and shopping centers. It owns more than half the UK’s entire seashore, giving it hugely valuable auction rights for offshore commercial activity, such as wind farms.” The Crown controls nearly the entire seabed (and half the seashore) around the UK with any business wishing to build offshore windmills as part of the Green New Deal forced to rent their sea beds from the Crown Estate. It was noted by Byline Times that the Crown will stand to become “the biggest beneficiary of UK’s Green Agenda” which recently unveiled a 10 point plan for a “green revolution” and full decarbonization by 2050. For anyone confused about the exploding prices of inefficient energy sources across England, they wouldn’t get far without appreciating the tax-payer subsidized boondoggle of windmill farms. Prince Charles himself has demonstrated that he certainly doesn’t see the Crown as a symbolic entity and was accused of “incontinent lobbying” in 2013 when dozens of personal letters (dubbed the “Black Spider Memos”) to MPs and the Prime Minister were made public after an intense legal fight to keep them secret. Charles’ official biographer Jonathan Dimbleby even wrote in 2013 that upon Charles’ succession to the Crown that things would become much more hands on, and “that a quiet constitutional revolution is afoot.”[8] Prerogative Powers Are Real Although much effort goes into portraying the Crown’s prerogative powers as merely symbolic, they cover nearly every branch of governance and have occasionally been used… although those British spheres of influence where they most apply are usually so self-regulating that they require very little input from such external influence to keep them in line. These powers were first revealed publicly in 2003 and in an article titled ‘Mystery Lifted on the Prerogative Powers’[9], the London Guardian noted that these powers include (but are not limited to): “Domestic Affair, the appointment and dismissal of ministers, the summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament, Royal assent to bills, the appointment and regulation of the civil service, the commissioning of officers in the armed forces, directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK (and other Commonwealth nations), appointment of Queen’s Counsel, Issue and withdrawal of passports, Prerogative of mercy. (Used to apply in capital punishment cases. Still used, eg to remedy errors in sentence calculation), granting honours, creation of corporations by Charter, foreign Affairs, the making of treaties, declaration of war, deployment of armed forces overseas, recognition of foreign states, and accreditation and reception of diplomats.” When a 2009 bill was introduced into parliament proposing that these powers be limited, a Privy Council-led Justice Ministry review concluded that such limitations would ‘”dangerously weaken” the state’s ability to respond to a crisis’ and the bill was promptly killed[10]. Acting on Provincial levels, we find Lieutenant Governors who (in Canada) happen to be members of the Freemasonic Knights of St John of Jerusalem. King Charles and the Great ResetCharles demonstrated this “more hands on” approach to governance on June 3, 2020 when he became the official patron of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and even officially launched the project Tweeting out #TheGreatReset. On his official website, the Prince launched the project saying “Today, through HRH’s Sustainable Markets Initiative and the World Economic Forum, The Prince of Wales launched a new global initiative, The Great Reset”. Eco-Warrior King of a New CrusadeCharles has demonstrated the sort of enthusiasm for decarbonization of the world which one tends to only find in a religious fanatic setting himself up as the eco-warrior of monarchs, a crusader king of a new religion, except instead of Muslims in the Holy Land, our new Davos-connected eco-crusaders have targeted carbon dioxide and the industrial civilization, farming and useless eaters who cause it, to be the poisonous threat that must be destroyed. Charles appears to see himself walking in the footsteps of his WWF-founding father as the new leading spokesman for a total transformation of society under a WEF-green governance priesthood. A July 2022 edition of Australia’s Spectator aptly characterized Charles’ misanthropic activism in the following terms: “The environmentalism that the Prince has decided to occupy himself with while he awaits to ascend the throne is not a harmless sort of apolitical tree-planting or rainforest-saving activity. He’s not hugging pandas or funding wildlife sanctuaries. Instead, he has engaged himself in a hybrid business and political uprising that threatens the survival of the political system which he is meant to oversee. In addition to being a betrayal of the ordinary citizen, his actions represent a failure to his sole duty as future king – to protect the constitutional monarchy from rising climate fascism and globalism.” Nazi Roots of House of Saxe-Coburg-GothaThe role of the Crown in leading a revival of practices of global totalitarianism, population control and fascism is not unprecedented. An uncomfortable fact which has recently unveiled by the documentary Edward VIII: Britain’s traitor King on Britain’s Channel 4, this fascist heart of the Crown was alive during the darkest years before and during World War 2. This film, based upon a soon-to-be released book by historian Andrew Lownie, uses recently declassified reports from the Royal Archives to tell the story of Britain’s Nazi King Edward VIII who not only desired a Nazi victory in WWII, but actively worked towards said goal from the moment he was forced to abdicate the throne in 1936 (allegedly to marry an American divorcée Wallis Simpson) throughout the darkest days of the war itself. As this documentary proves, teaching his young niece Elizabeth II how to do a proper ‘sieg heil’ wasn’t his only dance with Nazism. While in exile in Portugal where the royal hob knobbed with Germany’s elite, the documentary cites diplomatic cables sent by Edward to German officials demanding that the Nazis relentlessly bomb England into submission in 1940 encouraging the deaths of millions of innocent civilians. The film also cites a little-known speech where Edward called for Britain’s surrender to the Nazis in 1939 which the BBC refused to air. Even after being sent to the Bahamas by imperial officials who had decided it more expedient to put down their Frankenstein monster than continue with their earlier plans for a fascist New World Order, the Nazi would-be king had cabled Hitler’s officials indicating his willingness to return to Europe when needed and retake his rightful seat on the throne as an Aryan king. Beyond the case of Edward VIII, there are many other embarrassing Nazi connections to the house of Windsor (formerly Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) which the film failed to mention, some of which implicate the late Prince Consort Philip Mountbatten (aka: Duke of Edinburgh) directly. Philip himself maintained the family tradition, when founding the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) with fellow one-time Nazi Party member Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a lifelong eugenicist and Bilderberg Group founder, in 1961. Philip and Bernhard were joined by Sir Julian Huxley (then president of the Eugenics Society of Britain) as WWF co-founder. In an August 1988 interview with Deutsche Press Agentur, Prince Philip proclaimed his desire to return in the next life as a deadly virus to help “solve overpopulation”. Prince Philip exuded cold misanthropic “musings” throughout his life as he contemplated the human zoo asserting: “You cannot keep a bigger flock of sheep than you are capable of feeding. In other words conservation may involve culling in order to keep a balance between the relative numbers in each species within any particular habitat. I realize this is a very touchy subject, but the fact remains that mankind is part of the living world. Every new acre brought into cultivation means another acre denied to wild species.” It should be noted Charles continued his dad’s legacy as president of the British World Wildlife Foundation which he has headed for over 30 years. The Nazi pedigree of the royal family and its loyal managers raises the question: Why has their continuation of Nazi eugenics doctrine in the form of the euthanasia and zero-growth movements not become more widely known? What type of world do we live in, that such startling facts could not be general knowledge? The true Empire has always been a financial oligarchy which is used by a vast network of power structures to advance the interests of the aristocracy of Europe; The current epicenter of power is the Anglo-Dutch monarchies. It is this power that controls the Bilderberg Group, its junior appendage the World Economic Forum, and steers American policy through the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (the American version of Chatham House). It was to leading Chatham House member Lord Lothian in 1937 that Hitler laid out his concept for the Anglo-German New World Order saying: “Germany, England, France, Italy, America and Scandinavia… should arrive at some agreement whereby they would prevent their nationals from assisting in the industrializing of countries such as China, and India. It is suicidal to promote the establishment in the agricultural countries of Asia of manufacturing industries.” Any number of technocrats pushing a “Build Back Better for the World” scheme or “Global Green New Deal” could have said the same thing. Today, the Canadian Institute for International Affairs has been renamed the Canadian International Council (CIC). The CIC is Chaired by Oxford-trained regime change specialist Ben Rowswell who worked closely with Privy Councillor Chrystia Freeland in attempting to overthrow the government of Maduro in favor of WEF-puppet Juan Guaido which continues to this day. A key pillar in the control over colonies of Anglo-Dutch influence remains the Privy Council system, which is centered in Britain, but has secondary branches in select Commonwealth countries. It is under the Privy Council’s influence that lower-level operatives are instituted in the form of deputy ministers, the Treasury Board, Select Committees, and other appointed officials in the Civil Service. Other key nodes in the public and private sector manage the interests of the Crown. All cabinet members of government are made Privy Councillors and all Privy Councillors are sworn to an oath of secrecy and allegiance to the Queen including oaths to keep secret those things spoken of in privy council meetings. The Crown as the Key to the Continuity of EmpireOf course, it would be silly to believe that Charles (or any previously reigning monarch) were their own person, while ignoring the armada of handlers, courtiers and deeper Byzantine grand strategists who revolve around the Crown as an institution sometimes dubbed “the Fount of All Honors”. The Fount of All Honors is an official term which denotes the legal idea that all authority for the public and private affairs emanates from the single source of the Crown and its unbroken bloodline. Continuity is everything for empire, and the importance of maintaining institutions that transcend individual lifetimes has always been a point of high concern. In a post-1776 world that began to get a taste for self-government, freedom and democracy as a new mode of self-organization, the “stability” of hereditary institutions came under grave threat. It would not be an exaggeration to say that the past 250 years has been shaped by the clash of these two opposing paradigms of organizing society. Where one paradigm assumes as self-evident the existence of inalienable rights of all people, the other system presumes that the only inalienable rights are those held by an oligarchical master class who wish to rule over subjects (aka: useless eaters) whose population levels must be periodically culled for easier management. The supposition that rights cannot be granted or withheld by a superior bloodline is truly anathema to any system of oligarchism even if it masquerades behind the costume of a species of democracy designed to placate plebs but not allow them or their representatives the means of influencing anything truly meaningful about their reality. Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review, and Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow. He is author of the ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series and Clash of the Two Americas trilogy. Source: Global Research – Global Britain and King Charles’s Great Reset Notes: The post Global Britain and Charles’ Great Reset appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. The Private Bank of England Corporationby Ian Davis, UK Column Contrary to the stories we are told about the Bank of England (BoE), it is not “owned” by the Government. The BoE is a private corporation managed by its Court of Directors by virtue of the authority invested in the Court by Royal Charter. Charles with Evelyn de Rothschild, who served as Elizabeth’s financial adviser.The Government has no power to interfere in the BoE’s “business”. This can only be done through amendments to its Charter, and the BoE must consent to make the Charter “anew”. BoE-related government legislation, such as the 1946 and 1998 Bank of England Acts, are legal constructs which the BoE permits. The BoE allows the Government to create legislation that enhances its status as a private corporation, one with the “public” authority to make monetary policy – thus affording the BoE immense financial and economic power. The BoE’s Alleged Purpose The BoE declares: Our mission is to maintain monetary and financial stability for the good of the people of the United Kingdom. To do this, we provide safe, confidential and reliable banking and custodial services that underpin our responsibilities as banker to the UK Government. The BoE provides services to the Government. It “acts” as the Debt Management Office’s “agent” for settlement of its debt securities (government bonds). The BoE also “acts” as the UK Treasury’s “agent”, holding its gold and other assets. The current governor of the Bank of England (BoE), Andrew Bailey, has blamed British inflation on many and varied people. He blamed workers and their unions for calling for wage increases. More recently, he blamed businesses for increasing prices, as they try to absorb the rising costs that result from inflation. The BoE, like the Government, uses the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) to measure inflation. The CPI does not provide a true reflection of the real impact of inflation and only partially records the effect of inflation. Nor does the CPI tell us anything about the cause of inflation. Inflation is primarily caused by the monetary policy that is firmly under the control of the BoE. In 1951, the economist Ludwig von Mises said: Inflation, as this term was always used everywhere and especially in this country [the United States], means increasing the quantity of money and bank notes in circulation and the quantity of bank deposits subject to check. But people today use the term “inflation” to refer to the phenomenon that is an inevitable consequence of inflation, that is the tendency of all prices and wage rates to rise. Bailey is among the many modern “financial experts” who conflate the effect of inflation – rising prices – with its cause, monetary expansion. In his most recent letter to the chancellor of the Exchequer, Andrew Bailey wrote: The increase in CPI inflation in the aftermath of the pandemic mainly reflected large increases in global energy prices and other tradable goods prices. [. . .] Russia’s invasion of Ukraine [. . .] greatly exacerbated the rise in energy prices as well as wholesale prices of many agricultural commodities. [. . .] These external factors continue to add significantly to inflationary pressures in the United Kingdom[.] According to Bailey, sterling inflation mainly reflects the impact of “external factors”. The BoE’s – and Bailey’s – eagerness to blame anyone and anything for current inflation, except the BoE’s own monetary policy, is utterly at odds with its own stated purpose. The BoE’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) lays out its alleged responsibility: Monetary policy affects how much prices are rising – called the rate of inflation. We set monetary policy to achieve the Government’s target of keeping inflation at 2%. Low and stable inflation is good for the UK’s economy and it is our main monetary policy aim. Again, according to the BoE, it controls monetary policy and it is this – not so-called pandemics, wars or wage demands – that “affects how much prices are rising”. Suggesting that it can control inflation, the BoE declares that managing inflation is in fact its “main monetary policy aim”. While quick to take credit for on-target, stable inflation, the BoE points the finger at everyone else when the situation deteriorates. It both claims that it can control inflation and that inflation is beyond its control. Currently, the BoE is seemingly failing to “maintain monetary and financial stability”. If it can’t perform its primary function, what use is it? On the other hand, if it is capable, then perhaps we should entertain the possibility that it is deliberately trying to destabilise the economy. Either way, it hardly appears trustworthy. The “Public” Bank of England Contradiction The narrative we are given, claiming that the BoE is a “public corporation”, is an attempt to obfuscate using a meld of contradictions. When we examine these inconsistencies, the idea that the BoE is a “public” body becomes untenable. The BoE was incorporated by Royal Charter in 1694. It is registered at Companies House as RC000042. A corporation is a juridical person. The BoE is a legal entity, in its own right, able to act in its own interest. The British Government’s central ministry and the de-facto repository of many Crown powers, the Cabinet Office, defines public corporations in its Classification of Public Bodies as: [. . .] market bodies controlled by either Central Government or Local Government. A public corporation is distinct from other incorporated bodies because it is “controlled by Government”. In the UK, the Office for National Statistics lists the BoE as just such a public-sector financial corporation. Yet the BoE contradicts this entirely and says of itself: Although we [the BoE] are owned by HM Treasury, we carry out our responsibilities independently. We’re free from day-to-day political influence. Which is it? The BoE can’t be both controlled by Government and “free from day-to-day political influence”. If we then consider the BoE’s incorporation by Royal Charter, the Government appears to lack the necessary authority to direct the BoE in any event. The Privy Council, the Sovereign’s supreme advisory body through which the Crown wields its fullest sovereignty, explains incorporation by Royal Charter: A Royal Charter is an instrument of incorporation, granted by The King, which confers independent legal personality on an organisation and defines its objectives, constitution and powers to govern its own affairs. [. . .] Organisations incorporated by Charter are registered at Companies House, who allocate an identification number with the prefix ‘RC’. This is to distinguish them from the other bodies registered at Companies House which are incorporated under the various Companies Acts. The BoE’s power to “govern its own affair” is defined not by government statute but by its Royal Charter. The Charter decrees that the BoE: [S]hall be, and be called one Body Politick and Corporate, of themselves, in Deed and in Name, by the Name of The Governor and Company of the Bank of England; and them by that Name, one Body Politick and Corporate, in Deed and in Name, We do, for Us, our Heirs, and Successors, make, create, erect, establish, and confirm for ever [. . .] they and their Successors shall have perpetual Succession, and shall and may have and use a Common Seal, for the Use, Business, or Affairs of the said Body Politick and Corporate, and their Successors, with Power to break, alter, and to make anew their Seal from Time to Time, at their Pleasure, and as they shall see Cause. The “Company of the Bank of England” is empowered by Royal Charter to carry out its independent legal business “for ever”. The BoE has the power to amend – make anew, in seventeenth-century parlance – its Charter “from Time to Time, at their [its] Pleasure, and as they [the Governor and Company] shall see Cause”. The Charter continues: And by the same Name, they and their Successors in all Times coming, shall be able and capable in Law, to have, take, purchase, receive, hold, keep, possess, enjoy, and retain to them and their Successors, any Manors, Messuages, Lands, Rents, Tenements, Liberties, Privileges, Franchises, Hereditaments, and Possessions whatsoever, and of what Kind, Nature, or Quality soever. The BoE’s incorporating Charter of 1694 stipulates that it shall “in all Times” be “able and capable in Law” of retaining any and all of its liberties and privileges. Nowhere in the Charter is it laid down that The Majesty’s Government can impinge upon the BoE’s liberty to conduct its business as it wishes. It appears that the BoE’s consent would be required to restrict any of its liberties or privileges, just as with those of earlier date enjoyed by the Church of England and the City of London which were reaffirmed in Magna Carta, and as with the universities, which also hold Royal Charters. The Cabinet Office alleges that the BoE’s incorporation by Royal Charter “can be revoked by an Act of Parliament or by the Sovereign”. It then adds: In practice, a chartered body is normally dissolved through voluntary action culminating in a Petition for Surrender. This is done by the body [the BoE] petitioning The [King] in Council [the Privy Council] to accept the surrender of its Charter. The Petition is accompanied by an appropriate Deed of Surrender together with the original Charter bearing the Great Seal (and any Supplemental Charters). [. . .] It follows from this that a chartered body cannot be dissolved by executive action. Yet another contradiction: the BoE Charter “cannot be dissolved by executive action”. The Government can (note that modal verb) only revoke it if the BoE agrees to such “surrender”. Nor does the Government’s assertion that the Charter “can” be revoked by the Sovereign stand up to scrutiny. This time, the Privy Council contradicts HM Government, which it constitutionally pre-dates and outranks: The Sovereign has no power to revoke a Charter at will, without the consent of the original grantees or their successors. The Privy Council adds: In the absence of the consent of the grantee, it may be that the only way to revoke a Charter granted under the [Royal] prerogative would be by primary legislation [an Act of Parliament]. The Privy Council’s uncertainty about the dubious authority of possible legislation – which doesn’t currently exist – reveals another contradiction. All legislation requires Royal Assent before it can become “law” (setting aside questions of whether Royal Assent is currently given through lawful means). But, as the Privy Council itself notes, the Sovereign has no authority to revoke, in this instance, the BoE’s Charter without its consent. In 1670, Charles II was only able to revoke the Royal Charter of the Hudson’s Bay Company because the Company submitted its Deed of Surrender. From a constitutional perspective, it would be interesting to see the British Government try to enforce legislation to revoke the BoE’s Charter without its consent. As noted by the Privy Council, no government has ever revoked a Royal Charter without the express consent of the Charter holder: [. . .] The Privy Council Office is not aware of any Charter being revoked since the time of Charles II. In relation to a “Body Politick” incorporated by Royal Charter, the Privy Council adds: [. . .] amendments to the body’s Bye-laws or Statutes require the approval of the Privy Council [. . .]. This effectively means a degree of Government regulation of the affairs of the body. Beyond any Statutes or Bye-laws it might make, it seems that the BoE is not “controlled by the Government” in any way whatsoever. The BoE itself plainly states that it is “free” from government influence. It cannot be described as a “public corporation”, so why does the Office for National Statistics list it as such? Are we being deceived? The BoE’s “Ownership” Deception When it comes to BoE claims about it being “owned” by the Treasury, the deception is clear. We are wholly-owned by the UK government. The capital of the Bank is held by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of HM Treasury. In 1946, following its so-called “nationalisation”, BoE stock was transferred to its sole shareholder, the Treasury. Hence the BoE’s claim that it is “owned” by the Government. In law, this simply isn’t true. Shareholders do not “own” corporations. In the 1948 case of Short v Treasury Commisioners, the ruling was that “shareholders are not, in the eye of the law, part owners of the undertaking [company]”. This was later confirmed in the 2003 ruling, Inland Revenue v Laird Group. The British Government does not “own” the Bank of England. Neither, it seems, does the Government have any influence over the business of the BoE. The “ownership” canard is an apparent diversion from the germane question: who directs the business of the Bank of England? The BoE is managed by its Court of Directors: The Court of Directors manages the affairs of the Bank as a corporation. [. . .] They include determining the Bank’s objectives and strategy, and ensuring the effective discharge of the Bank’s functions and the most efficient use of its resources. [. . .] The members of Court are appointed by the Crown. The BoE Court of Directors have no duty to disclose any information about their decisions. In fact, by virtue of agreeing to take up their Court positions at the BoE, they give their oath to: [K]eep secret during my service with the Bank of England, and after the termination thereof, all matters with which I may become acquainted relating to the affairs and concerns of the Bank[.] While the Government claims some sort of oversight over the Court, the Directors’ oath, once again, contradicts this. The BoE Court doesn’t appear to have any notable relationship with the Government, but it has quite close ties to multinational corporations. The current Directors have variously held senior positions with:
The BoE is a private corporation which is controlled by its Court of Directors. The Court is overwhelmingly drawn from the private corporate world, and the Directors are appointed by the Crown – which is not the Government, much less Parliament. The Court runs the Bank of England as a private concern under a strict veil of secrecy. The BoE chooses what to disclose to the Government. The Government has no power to force the BoE to divulge anything. All it has are legislative agreements with the BoE regarding the information the Bank wishes to volunteer. Made Anew Through Legislation Like any legal “person”, the BoE is subject to law. The BoE has to abide by legislation or run the risk of prosecution. It does not possess diplomatic immunity, unlike certain supranational banks. Simultaneously, however, the BoE’s Royal Charter ensures that the Government cannot intervene in BoE “business”. Any legislation which changes the “business” of the BoE can only take effect if the BoE agrees to “make anew” its Royal Charter. The UK Government can make legislation within which the BoE has to operate, just as any other private bank does. But that is the full extent of government control of the BoE, which conducts its “business” in secret, under its Royal Charter. In its 2018 publication, The Bank of England Act 1998, the Charters of the Bank and Related Documents, the BoE admits as much: The 1694 Charter incorporates the Bank. [. . .] As a chartered corporation, incorporated pursuant to statute, the powers of the Bank have to be determined by reference to the 1694 Charter and statute and subsequent Charter and legislative amendments. The BoE acknowledges that it must abide by statute – but insists that, where legislation affects the powers of the BoE, changes can only be “determined” by reference to the BoE’s original 1694 Charter. It is the 1694 Charter which enshrines the BoE’s powers and independence, liberties and privileges, as seen above. So – seeing as legislation that amends, revokes or alters the BoE’s powers, liberties or privileges must be agreed by the BoE – we shouldn’t be surprised that successive legislative changes have all increased the BoE’s powers and strengthened its position. This includes its so-called “nationalisation” in 1946. The 1946 Act allegedly gave the Sovereign the power to revoke any and all aspects of the BoE Charter “except in so far as they incorporate the Bank”. In other words, the 1694 Charter of BoE incorporation was left immutably intact. The legislature conceded that it had no power to alter the Charter without the BoE’s full consent. The drafters of this post-war parliamentary bill even acknowledged the original wording of the 1694 Charter (emphasis added): [T]he Bank of England should be constituted and regulated in accordance with so much of the said Charters as remained unrevoked and such other Charters as might from time to time be granted and accepted on behalf of the Bank of England by the court of directors [. . .] Comically, the 1946 Act then decreed that the BoE “shall be constituted” and regulated in accordance with whatever the BoE decided not to allow the Government to “revoke”; i.e., the whole—unrevoked—1694 Charter of its incorporation which guaranteed that it could continue its business as it liked. The transfer of stock from the BoE to the Treasury did not represent a transfer of “ownership”, as most believe. Furthermore, during “nationalisation”, the power of the Court of Directors was protected under the 1946 Act: [. . .] every member of the court of directors of the Bank shall be a member of the said body corporate, notwithstanding that he holds no Bank stock [. . .] The Treasury gave the BoE’s private shareholders, who had previously held the BoE’s stock, “government stock” in return. For every £100 in BoE stock—held by the BoE’s private shareholders—the Treasury issued £400 in government stock, thereby quadrupling the BoE shareholders investment. The 1946 Act states: The Government stock issued in substitution for any Bank stock shall be held in the same rights and on the same trusts and subject to the same powers [and] privileges [. . .] as those in, on or subject to which the Bank stock was held immediately before the appointed day [. . .] so as to give effect to and not revoke any deed[.] The former BoE shareholders then received 3% annual interest on the government stock, representing a 12% annual dividend on their original BoE holdings. In addition, the Treasury committed to pay full market price for the government stock to the former BoE shareholders no sooner than twenty years later, thus significantly increasing the value of their assets. The BoE Court of Directors was then “authorised” to be the money manager for the government stock. Not only was “nationalisation” an incredibly sweet deal for the BoE private shareholders – and a terrible one for British taxpayers; in addition, the BoE’s management structure was protected and free to manage the government stock as it wished. “Nationalisation” was win-win for the private BoE. The 1998 Bank of England Act officially afforded the BoE “operational independence”, a phrase apparently intended to suggest that its independence was somehow qualified, although it is hard to imagine how it could have possibly been more independent. The pretence of government “powers” to – in any way – “control” the business of the Bank of England was exposed thoroughly in the 1998 Act. Once again, the “preservation” of all BoE powers, liberties and privileges was reiterated: As from the fifteenth day of June One thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight, and without prejudice to the preservation of the provisions of the Charter of the Bank of England dated the twenty-seventh day of July One thousand six hundred and ninety-four which incorporate the Bank of England [. . .] the Charter of the Bank of England dated the first day of March One thousand nine hundred and forty-six shall be and the same is hereby revoked. In other words, the BoE decided that it didn’t want to be “nationalised” anymore and unilaterally revoked the 1946 Charter amendments. The whole “nationalisation” exercise was a complete farce: a simple transfer of wealth from the taxpayer to the BoE’s original “shareholders”. The 1998 Act supposedly gave the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England the “responsibility” to formulate and implement monetary policy. That is, the BoE resolved that it would formulate UK monetary policy. While the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Government’s finance minister) would henceforth appoint four of the eleven members of the MPC, upon their appointment these appointees would become employees of the BoE and swear their allegiance to it. These are not ex officio posts. The full “agreed” extent of Treasury oversight was deemed in the 1998 Act to amount to a sole MPC “observer” with no voting rights. The 1998 Act changed the composition of the BoE Court of Directors firmly in favour of the BoE’s enhanced privacy, secrecy and independence from the Government. The Act meant that the Crown would appoint the Governor, two Deputy Governors and sixteen Non-Executive Directors to the Court. Like all Court Directors before them, they had to swear their oath of secrecy. The Governor was also required to swear his allegiance to the private BoE corporation and give his oath to uphold scrupulously the Bank’s powers, liberties and privileges under the 1694 Charter: [I] solemnly and sincerely declare that I will to the utmost of my power, by all lawful ways and means, endeavour to support and maintain the said Corporation and the liberties and privileges thereof. The Court’s power to manage the entirely independent business of the private BoE was reaffirmed: The Court will manage the Bank’s affairs, other than the formulation of monetary policy. This will include determining the Bank’s objectives and strategy, and ensuring the effective discharge of the Bank’s functions. As a supposed financial regulator and the “lender of last resort”, the members of the BoE Court were wary of being prosecuted for their part in enabling the profligate speculation that led to the 2008 financial crash. Therefore, the BoE Court decreed—despite the lack of any treaty or statutory provision to this end – that its MPC, and the BoE as a whole, would be immune from prosecution in relation to the matter. The 2009 Bank of England Act reads: The Bank of England has immunity in its capacity as a monetary authority [. . .] “immunity” means immunity from liability in damages in respect of action or inaction. To return to the 1998 Act, while it “reserved” Treasury powers to instruct the MPC, these could only be used in “extreme economic circumstances”. Despite subsequent tectonic financial shocks, such as the 2008 financial crisis and the pseudopandemic, the BoE tells us: To date, the Government’s power to issue directions has not been used. To be fair to the UK Government, there would be no purpose in its issuing directions to the BoE anyway. The Court and the MPC have allegiance to nothing beyond the BoE and its incorporating Charter. Government directions may be politely received, but the BoE is not compelled to follow them. UK Column recently reported the Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt’s, parliamentary statement reporting his discussions with the BoE Governor: I only ever say to him, please do what you think is necessary, as indeed you are legally bound to do under the Bank of England Act. Andrew Bailey’s “obligations” under the Bank of England Act(s) are to provide whatever limited information the BoE has deigned to share with the Government. The Government neither owns nor directs the BoE. The private Bank of England corporation is, and always has been, entirely and irrevocably beyond government control. Source: UK Column – The Private Bank of England Corporation Rothschild had forced Britain to set up a new “Bank of England”, over which he had absolute control: The post The Private Bank of England Corporation appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Face Mask Madness – Part OneFollowing on from my court appearance on 25th April 2023 before Charles Pitto, I present my side of the story, beginning with the first of my five close encounters of the mask-less kind on The Rock. With respect, Mr. Charles Pitto said he is very worried, and so he needs to hear and watch my story in court, and understand precisely why I have so vehemently opposed these unLAWFUL health-harming facemask mandates. The core part of this particular episode concerns my close encounter with DC Paul Gache of The Royal Gibraltar Police during the anti-mask protest held in Casemates Square in 2021. In this explosive episode, watch out for the special effect fireworks’ simulation going off close to the airport runway, with Airbus A400M (Charles) Atlas being the prime target, and please, to all viewers do take special note my NOVEL CORONAVIRUS terror threat assessment levels. Tony’s JAHTalk Channel – FACE MASK MADNESS – Part One RELATED: Tony Farrell – My Day in Court on 25 April 2023 Statement of Truth: Anthony of the Farrell Family V The Fraudulent Regina QE2The post Face Mask Madness – Part One appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Meet Charles, The Great Resetterby James Corbett While most of the the public’s attention is falling on the obvious issues—the monarchy’s increasing irrelevance to the 21st century, the colossal waste of taxpayer resources that go towards the upkeep of the world’s richest family and their multiple palaces, the dark history of slavery and other colonial abuses for which royals of the far-distant past are responsible—few are aware of just how dark the history of the royal family is, or just how twisted Charles’ vision for the future of the United Kingdom—and, indeed the world—really is. It’s hard to be a human being living on planet Earth in May of 2023 and not be hearing about, reading about or listening to discussions about the pending coronation of Charles. Yes, Charles’ big day is dominating news headlines at the moment, and it seems that the glitz and glamour of the upcoming coronation are infecting people around the globe with a case of royal fever. . . . Well, maybe not everyone. No, not everyone is happy about Charles stepping into his mother’s shoes . . . or diamond-encrusted loafers, or gold-plated clodhoppers, or whatever it is that monarchs wear to prevent their poor, delicate royal feet from touching the earth. James Corbett: “It’s incomprehensible that this royal eugenicist is trotted out to be the face of The Great Reset and to lecture the peasants about how they’ll have to become serfs on the neofeudal plantation for the sake of Mother Earth, but even more disheartening is the fact that there are still vast swaths of people who believe that this family has been chosen by God Himself to rule over an entire nation (or even a commonwealth).”* Watch the video or read the transcript available at the source-link. Source: James Corbett – Episode 443 – Meet King Charles, The Great Resetter * God Chose His Own Son to Rule Over The United Kingdom, not Charles: The post Meet Charles, The Great Resetter appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. The Coronation Oath: A Mighty Trojan HorseVT’s Professor Gloria Moss reveals more UK Secrets behind the Royal Family Curtain by Gloria Moss PhD (with added hyperlinks). The secret powers of the recently published Oathby Professor Gloria Moss PhD The text that Charles will add his signature to on Saturday was published recently and it offers the people of Britain and the Commonwealth some extraordinary powers. For, although academics at University College London’s constitution unit state that the oath is of overwhelmingly ‘symbolic significance,’ (2022, p.10), a report by the House of Commons from May this year states that the oath is the only part of the ceremony that is required by law. The oath is in fact binding, and a contract with the people of the realms that fall under its jurisdiction. So, as millions are pinned to their television screens for the lavish spectacle, one conservatively costing the British taxpayer £100 million (twice the equivalent sum spent on his mother’s coronation), they might like to serve as witnesses to three aspects of the oath. One is the undertaking that Charles will make to govern according to the ‘laws and customs’ of the relevant realms and territories. A second is to do the utmost in his power to ‘maintain the laws of God’ and a third. The third aspect to look out for is whether Charles signs the oath below the text as people around the world do, or whether he does as Elizabeth II did and signs her signature above the text. A word on each of these and the secret power that they offer the peoples of Britain and the Commonwealth. Laws and customsThe monarch’s commitment to observe the ‘laws and customs’ of the realms goes back to King Edward II who is the earliest English coronation for which we have an official record. Not only that, but Edward II’s oath largely remained the format for a coronation oath for nearly four hundred, and these words were included also in the oath sworn by Elizabeth II. Why are these words significant? Well, according to the most authoritative jurist of the thirteenth century, Henry de Bracton, ‘the English hold many things by custom which they do not hold by law’ and ‘kings need only to have allowed the custom for it to be granted’. In saying this, Henry de Bracton brings the Magna Carta within the orbit of ‘customs’ and in so doing, asserts people’s rights as ‘freemen’ alongside their right to a trial by jury, a right specified in Article 39 of the Magna Carta [Article 39 (1215) – [Article 29 (1297*)]. What is more, Magna Carta allows, in Article 61, for the lawful rebellion of 25 barons, a right invoked in 2001 and still in force. The bottom line? People in Britain and in the Commonwealth realms can take Charles at his word and assert their right to a trial by jury and to their rights as freemen of the land. This means that obligations addressed to the so-called legal fiction (the all capitals name that corporatises people rather than addresses them as living beings) are legally rendered null and void. This means that any attempt by the Ministry of Justice in Britain to nullify the freeman of the land philosophy is itself negated by the King’s oath. The Laws of GodSo, the monarch’s undertaking to observe the laws and customs of the realms confirms the power not only of the Magna Carta but also of Common law and people’s status as free men and women. For hundreds of years, monarchs have sworn these words but perhaps now, at a pivotal point in human history, the people can finally use this aspect of the monarch’s oath to assert their sovereign status as living men and women. What follows from this is tantamount to the legalisation of civil disobedience, whether in the form of non-payment of Council Tax, income tax, or penalty charges, the first two of which must legally require contractual consent and the last of which requires to be heard via a jury trial. And there is much more besides that they can use. For, a monarch swearing to observe ‘the laws of God’ is swearing to follow the injunctions set down in the first given books of the Bible and this has three important consequences. Firstly, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited and you can refer to this in these sections of Deuteronomy:
The force of these words is that the monarch is in breach of their oath the moment that they add their signature to any new statute. All the kings and queens who have added their signatures to pieces of legislation have broken their oaths and ceased to be legitimate monarchs. With that, the line of descent, for example from Elizabeth II to Charles, is an illegitimate one. At the same time, all aspects of government, whether the legislature, the executive, or the judiciary, all of which act under the authority of the monarch. Now to the second point. Deuteronomy outlaws the practice of usury as you can read here:
So any monarch who allows the continuing practice of usury in their realms is in breach of their oath. The people would be within their rights to declare that the monarch has breached their oath were they not to take a stand against usury. The third consequence that flows from a monarch’s commitment to observing ‘the laws of God concerns their relationship with foreign powers. Deuteronomy stipulates that a monarch who hands the reigns of power over to an authority who is a ‘stranger’, in other words, someone who is not from your country, would be in dereliction of their duties to God:
This would prohibit Charles III from working closely with any powers outside of Britain, including the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO, and of course the UN. Were he to do this, then the people would be within their rights to claim that the monarch had broken their oath to the people and was now an illegitimate monarch. This would not only end his moral claim to the throne but as with the other two points, bring to an end all aspects of government, whether the legislature, the executive, or the judiciary, all of which act under the authority of the monarch. Final point: the signatureIn June 2022, the signed coronation oath of the Queen was digitised for the first time to mark the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. As you can see from the image of the oath, the Queen signs the oath above the text of the document, rather than below it as would be customary in a legal document. There are compelling reasons for signing below since doing this attests to the person’s willingness to abide by the terms in the body of the text. Moreover, signing below a piece of text prevents new text from being added subsequently. I have written elsewhere about the many anomalies in Queen Elizabeth II’s signed coronation oath but when it comes to Charles III’s Coronation Oath, you may want to observe during the ceremony where Charles places his signature. If it is above the text, as with the Queen’s signature, then you rightly ask whether Charles has entered into a contract with the people of Britain and the Commonwealth and whether he is their rightful king. As with the case of the three points above, a failure to create a valid contract with the people nullifies his claim to be king and, with that, undermines the judiciary, the legislature, and the executive. The coronation chairThere is of course also the vexed question of the wooden coronation chair. Since the 13th century, British monarchs have been crowned on a chair containing the Stone of Scone seized in 1296 by England’s king Edward I from Scotland’s Scone Abbey following his victory at the Battle of Dunbar. However, on 25 December 1950, four students, all Scottish nationalists, took The Stone from Westminster Abbey on 25 Dec 1950 and returned it to Scotland in the trunk of a car. One of the four, Ian R. Hamilton, subsequently a Q.C., maintained in three of his books that the stone weighed 4cwt (458lbs.) but that the stone in Westminster Abbey, subsequently moved to Edinburgh Castle in 1996, only weighed 3cwt (336lbs.). In September 2022, Historic Environment Scotland confirmed that the object described as the Stone of Destiny in the Crown Room at Edinburgh Castle would be transferred to London for use in Charles’s coronation. With possible discrepancies in the weight and also the colour of the stone (some say that the original stone was black, not the current pale colour) doubts remain that the Stone of Scone was used in Elizabeth’s coronation—and now about to be used in Charles’—is actually the genuine article. The monarch: a vital check against tyrannous governmentBreaches of contract by the monarch might lead to strong anti-monarchist sentiment where in fact it would be more productive to maintain a monarchy, with all that it offers in terms of a check against tyrannous government. So rather than dispensing with monarchy, a national debate could take place on the selection of a new monarch willing to do his or her utmost to respect the laws and customs of Britain and the Commonwealth as well as the laws of God. Source: Veteran’s Today – The Coronation Oath on 6 May: A Mighty Trojan Horse * According to the British Library, clauses 39 & 40 of the 1215 charter became clause 29 in the 1297 charter. It is the latter that is more commonly quoted. The Laws of God – The New Song About Author: Professor Gloria Moss PhD is the author of over seventy peer review journal and conference papers. She is the author of eight books, many published by Routledge and Palgrave Macmillan. Her latest book, written with Katherine Armitage, is Light Bulb Moments and the Power of Critical Thinking (2023), published by Truth University Press, the publisher also of The Dark Side of Academia: How Truth is Suppressed. RELATED: Coronation Oath: Will Charles Liberate or Enslave The People? Charles and Britain’s Constitutional Crisis The Divine Significance Of The Stone of Destiny PROFANE WICKED PRINCE CHARLES – your day is come.The post The Coronation Oath: A Mighty Trojan Horse appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Charles plans to meet with Globalists
Charles and the Globalists set meeting for September at which they will plot how to accelerate goals of U.N. Agenda 2030 and the complete digitization of humanity
by Leo Hohmann The World Economic Forum and United Nations are so concerned that the goals of Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development and the Great Reset (aka technocracy under a one-world beast system) are in jeopardy of not being fulfilled by the appointed date, that they have called for a summit in September to discuss how they can kickstart their stalled totalitarian agenda. The September 18-19 Summit in New York will “mark the beginning of a new phase of accelerated progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals,” according to the U.N. website. The WEF, founded in 1971 by German economist and engineer Klaus Schwab under the tutelage of Dr. Henry Kissinger, has said for years that by 2030 the people of the world will “own nothing,” that they will “have no privacy,” but they will somehow learn to like their evolving state of digital slavery. You will be living in a tiny apartment in a so-called smart city, where almost no one works, sitting back playing video games and drawing a universal basic income check from the government. The smart homes situated inside smart cities will be powered by artificial intelligence, an all-knowing force with a watchful eye on everyone’s activities, movement, even their thoughts. People will willingly eat bugs and artificial lab-grown meat as their source of protein in a universal effort to help the Earth “heal” itself through carbon neutrality. Never mind that in a world free of carbon, no plant life will be able to sustain itself and famine will claim the lives of millions. There will be a “life saving vaccine” for literally every form of sickness, and there will be plenty of that, as people submit to demands that they replace their natural human immune system with a man-made one powered by synthetic mRNA that takes over one’s body and completely changes its DNA. You’re no longer human. You’re TRANS-human, meaning you are transitioning or evolving into a higher life form that is part human and part machine (1 Tim. 5:20). Humans will finally be able to “direct their own evolution” through advances in technology, says Schwab’s chief advisor, the Israeli historian Professor Yuval Noah Harari. In the wake of the Covid pandemic in 2020, Schwab and the WEF released a new book and agenda which they branded “The Great Reset,” where they saw this massive crisis as a “narrow window of opportunity” to radically transform the world from physical and tangible to virtual and digital. Everything in this new world is connected, every appliance, every vehicle, every highway and light post, every home, every body. Hence the call for not only an Internet of Things but an Internet of Bodies. As Harari stated, the surveillance that humans fully accepted as part of the new normal during the pandemic would soon make the next great leap. He predicted, when it comes to surveillance “now it’s going under the skin.” Harari said: “When people look back, the thing they will remember from the Covid crisis is that this is the moment when everything went digital …when everything became monitored.” See brief video below. DGTV – Surveillance Under The Skin | Dr. Yuval Noah Harari But it’s more than just the U.N. and WEF who are behind the Great Reset of humanity and the pressure to change the way we live, forcing us into what they would call a higher state of consciousness in which, aided by artificial intelligence, we come into “harmony and balance” with nature, as stated on the Georgia Guidestones monument. One of the biggest pushers of this dystopian vision is Charles, whose coronation is set to take place on May 6. Listen to him wax eloquent about his grandiose collectivist plan for humanity in the short video below. DGTV – #TheGreatReset When Charles talks about the Great Reset and the goals of the U.N. it sounds more like a religion than anything else. Earth worship. He beckons us to follow his lead into this new religion. While he claims to be a Christian, Charles never mentions the Bible, God the Father, or Jesus Christ, the one who has the desire to save not the Earth but the souls of those who inhabit the Earth. The Luciferians believe they can create their own version of heaven on Earth without the God of the Bible, and this is the greatest deception they dangle in front of weak human beings. Read Also – The Survival Guide for ALL Human-Beings King Charles has his own page on the WEF website in which he outlines the “10 actions we must take to drive the green recovery.” These 10 actions are truly frightening were they ever to be fully implemented as they would allow for basically no freedom in a top-down dictatorship that decides for us how all resources are to be allocated and used. Take, for example, number 4 on his list, in which he calls for what sounds like the formation of the Sustainability Police given the power to enforce “sustainability compliance” with one-world standards set by the “Paris Agreement.” He writes as follows: 4. Rigorously work towards the provision of reliable data and actively advance the adoption of common metrics and standards, as for example in the IBC scorecard, in order to allow more informed assessments of sustainability compliance and opportunities for improvement, in particular with regard to alignment with the Paris Agreement. It is time now to move towards unified metrics and global standards, to encourage accelerated progress through uniformed benchmarking. And what about those of us who refuse to comply with these “global standards”? It will no doubt be off to the gulag, or maybe even off with our heads! But progress toward this supposedly new and better world that Charles talks about is not moving fast enough to meet his expectations and the expectations of the WEF, the United Nations, Klaus Schwab, Yuval Harari, Bill Gates, Larry Fink, George Soros and the rest of the Luciferians who have managed to place their minions in the key positions of power throughout our institutions. Schwab openly brags about having “penetrated the cabinets” of major nations with WEF puppets. See 2-minute video below. DGTV – Klaus Schwab/HARVARD Talk/ Trudeau Cabinet & others “penetrated” Despite all of this “progress,” things just aren’t moving fast enough for these psychopaths. Last week the WEF released a post saying that “civic participation is key to meeting UN sustainability targets” to fulfill the goals of “Agenda 2030.” The WEF wrote: “Attacks on civil society and civic freedoms threaten to unravel achievements in meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They are weakening action to tackle economic inequality, gender imbalances, corruption and environmental degradation.” So they have planned a special 2023 SDG Summit for September 18-19 in New York, where they will discuss the world’s shortcomings in meeting their 17 Sustainable Development Goals, calling the forum meeting “enormously significant,” as a select group of world leaders are expected to be in attendance. According to the U.N. website: “They will carry out a comprehensive review of the state of the SDGs, respond to the impact of multiple and interlocking crises facing the world, and provide high-level political guidance on transformative and accelerated actions leading up to the target year of 2030 for achieving the SDGs.” The U.N. posting goes on to say that: “The special edition of the report of the Secretary-General entitled ‘Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards a Rescue Plan for People and Planet’, the Advance Unedited version has been released.” The timing of this meeting may be significant. What other manufactured crises could be upon us by mid-September? World War III? Food shortages and famine? Civil unrest? It really is amusing listening to the globalists drone on about the world’s problems and how their solutions will take into account everyone’s best interests. Gender imbalances? These are the same people encouraging young children to be confused about what their gender even is. Environmental degradation? These are the folks who want all vehicles, all appliances, all lawn and garden tools, everything to run off of power generated by the electric grid, which cannot even sustain the current level of power needs, let alone if we all traded our gas-powered cars, gas stoves, leaf blowers, tractors, mowers, chainsaws, etc., for electric ones. And where do they plan on putting those toxic solar panels and lithium batteries after they outlive their useful life? What about those wind turbines that are killing birds and sea life? Read Also – The JAH Environmental Page So don’t tell us about civic participation and sustainability and how you will give us a better world and all of the other lies. The globalists care about one thing: Domination. Control. They will do anything, tell any lie, to achieve it. And they wonder why there has been a breech of trust; why people around the world have had enough of the incessant lies, manufactured crises, arrogance and intolerance of dissenting views that come down from the globalists and their elitist institutions. Source: Leo Hohmann – King Charles and the Globalists set meeting for September at which they will plot how to accelerate goals of U.N. Agenda 2030 and the complete digitization of humanity RELATED: The New World Order is Communism Charles and The Great Retraction – The WEF Technocracy is Unconstitutional Who Runs London’s Rothschild Dynasty? PROFANE WICKED PRINCE CHARLES – your day is come.The post Charles plans to meet with Globalists appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Net Zero and the Transhuman Agenda: War Against Nature and Humanityby Julian Rose, with added scripture and notes I have covered the great deception of ‘Net Zero’ in more than one article already. But I’m sticking with it because this massive con trick lies right at the heart of the current attempt, by a small group of psychotic control freaks, to gain absolute control over planetary life and to eviscerate the fundamental laws of nature in the process. We must spell it out as it is. The intention behind the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, Green Deal ‘Net Zero’ agenda is to completely block off the arteries of sentient life on earth and replace them with an insentient artificial construct (1 Tim. 5:20) A construct which, going under the heading ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ demands that thinking man/woman is made redundant, to be replaced by computer power directly accessed to the human brain. The Transhuman agenda. Rapidly developing algorithmic and digital technologies are the dark techno gods of this planned take-over of life on earth (Deut. 5:7). A life that must be stripped bare of access to the higher dimensions of universal awareness, and kept strictly to a material, five sense prison camp, to include passive obeisance to the perpetrators. We must not be afraid to state that the motivation for bringing about this dystopian holocaust is quite obviously very dark. There has existed for millennia, a perverted anti-life element within the human race, which is only out for its own narcissistic ends. It’s a ‘me, me, me’ obsessed element which has no truck with the existence of God, or indeed any universal benign source of life. It only knows the essentially demonic cravings for ‘full spectrum dominance’. (Gal. 5:24) The weaker mirrored version of this despotic malfeasance is to be found in those largely unconscious human beings who become hypnotically entangled with this grandiose narcissism. Here the current obsession is the ‘selfie’ and the seeming need to show others ‘how one is looking’ in 101 different poses and locations on an almost daily – if not hourly- basis. “Oh well” some may say “at last they are having fun”. But, I observe, the love affair with the seductive agility of the EMF powered mobile phone, is actually an obsession. It follows a very similar pattern as the smoking addict. Let’s make no mistake – Satan / the Opposer / Evil (whatever you prefer) directs drugs at the more spiritual people to soothe the feeling that “something’s not right with the world today” and prevent them from finally (after the heart-ache, sorrow and depression) DOING something about it (BEGINNING TO CHANGE THE WORLD) the system. That we cannot do this (“it’s impossible”) and that he doesn’t exist, are 2 of the 3 biggest lies that the father of lies (the Devil) has ever told us. It is because we have believed his lies that we are in such a mess. The BIGGEST of these lies is that we are ONLY human. – Why People Really Take Drugs Young people in their tens of millions have developed a kind of nervous need to repeatedly pull their cell phones out of their back pockets and check if anyone has called them. It is an addiction which has produced a weird kind of spectacle to those who remember a time when people looked where they were going and took-in the atmosphere and specialness of place without needing to ‘snap’ it and without the snapper making sure that he/she is the main feature of each image! Humanity, until a critical number become conscious, automatically follows the messages and psychological persuasions of those who control the status quo. Who set the agenda. So when Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari announce that it’s ‘advanced technology’ that is going to lead humanity to the promised land, and that a reinvented cyborgian world will be ‘an improvement on God’s version’, many EMF addicts fail to register any resistance to this soulless proclamation. They are already half way there. Nevertheless, some seem to be aroused by the story that the ending of the world will come about via something called ‘global warming’. This suggests that there must be some form of self preservation instinct still working here. Some emotional sense of the undesirability of this outcome. But we should question whether this emotion is the result of being told, repeatedly “you should be frightened”, or whether it is an actual sense of shock? Followers of Greta Thunberg, Extinction Rebellion and Stop Oil, for example, seem prepared to make quite a show out of their ‘save the world’ ambitions. It looks real enough until one realises these are governments and WEF/Soros/Gates sponsored shows and that the participants are brainwashed believers in whatever they see or hear on the BBC, CNN or their favourite social media portal. Their brain cells seem to lack the ability to make an independent critical judgement. There has been a deadening of the basic will power ‘to question’. The relentless process of psychological attrition is something that the proponents of a New World Order do particularly well. Dumbing down is proving an effective weapon in the war against a humanity collectively addicted to the technological take-over of their lives, and to the fake green story about ‘the ending of the world’. That fake green story centres around the stated WEF, UN, EU imperative for achieving a ‘Net Zero’ world by 2050. An imperative, one way or the other, signed up to by just about every country of the world. But, as I have explained in previous writings, ‘Net Zero’ is a quasi scientific fiction, completely devoid of reason or rational thought. It utilises two abstracted meaningless words ‘net’ and ‘zero’ to convey something that everybody is supposed to understand as a saviour remedy for an overheating planet, but which is actually a scurrilous plot for the decimation of life on earth. Please be aware: ‘Net Zero’ exactly fits the description of what we are told run-away global warming would do to our living planet. The demonic element of mankind likes to perform this sort of black magic on unsuspecting mortals. It likes to reverse the reality and make the complete suppression of the ‘plant CO2 to oxygen’ photosynthesis cycle – into a global redemption agenda. And the survival of a living breathing green planet, the number one enemy. If one chooses to interpret ‘Net Zero’ as a jargonistic way of saying ‘zero carbon’, one is led to believe that those standing behind this planned global ecocide have pinned all their alarm-clamouring around a recent verifiable trend of just 0.13 centigrade increase in warming per decade, with no increase observed since 2016 and a slight cooling factor detected since then (NOAH/NASA). This is the ‘science’ which stands behind the story of the coming ‘catastrophic over heating’ of the planet. Which can can only see ‘excess CO2’ as the key causative agent of our planetary demise. Such a position fails to take cognisance of the fact that our global survival system is being brutally subjected to a litany of deeply wounding attacks via out of control levels of pesticides, plastics, chemtrails, EMF pollution, gas fracking, nuclear radiation, deforestation, concreting over of fertile land, water poisoning, insect annihilation, GMO mono-cropping, animal factory farming and its toxic wastes, war (greatest finite fossil fuel user), ubiquitous oil spillages, wild life habitat destruction and continuous pharmaceutical disruption of the world’s natural healing systems – and much, much more. As if this litany of attacks on the integrity of planetary eco-systems and human health was not enough, we must now add:
Yes, a state that Yuval Harari claims will produce results better than those achieved by God. However, the rhetoric and the reality are not in sync. Cracks in the grand plan are appearing with increasing frequency. It’s leading figureheads appear increasingly off balance, almost comically in some cases. The Covid agenda has given us a much clearer view into the snake pit. We see there, amongst other things, the further weaponisation of health and the almost unfathomable deception perpetrated by Big Pharma and the US Department of Defence.[1] We are learning fast. We now see that Covid, 5G, Net Zero and the Great Reset/Green New Deal are all part of one plan: a declaration of war against nature and humanity. We are finding a commonality of resistance to this brutal intervention across an ever widening field of human expression. The pace of another sort of change is quickening. Antonio Guterres (WHO) announces the desperate need for further ‘Stop Global Warming’ measures, leading to the need to bring forward the ‘Net Zero’ deadline to 2040. He and his henchmen are clearly rattled by the rising tide of awareness and push-back. ‘We the people’ are rising inexorably. Spring is breaking through the waning grip of Winter. Push-on we will, for the challenge we are confronting has a liberating effect on our souls and on our passion for the manifestation of a life based on Truth.* Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer and international activist. He is President of the International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside and author of ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind’ See www.julianrose.info. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. Note [1] The recently uncovered evidence that the US Department of Defense financed the production of the mRNA GM ‘vaccine’ subsequently rolled out by the corporate pharmaceutical industry.Source: Global Research – “Net Zero” and the Transhuman Agenda: War Against Nature and Humanity * For a true “liberating effect on our souls and on our passion for the manifestation of a life based on Truth” read The Way home or face The Fire. RELATED: The Trilateral Commission and The New World Order An Invisible Prison Built Just for You The United Nations is Globalist Trojan HorseThe post Net Zero and the Transhuman Agenda: War Against Nature and Humanity appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. Almost half of British Commonwealth wants to ditch monarchyGibraltar Messenger: An example of Prophecy about “The darkening of the ‘Sun’ and the ‘Moon’ not reflecting her light.” In the news… A survey has indicated that Canada and Australia would vote to become republics if referendums were held. Almost half of the overseas countries in which Charles is head of state would vote to become republics if given the opportunity, a new poll has found. The survey conducted by former Conservative Party deputy chairman Michael Ashcroft suggests that six of the 14 overseas countries within Britain’s Commonwealth realm – including Canada and Australia – would prefer to ditch the monarchy. Among Australian respondents, 42% were in favor of becoming a republic, with 35% opposing the idea. Canada saw a greater disparity, according to Ashcroft’s data, with 47% pushing to be a republic and just 23% objecting. The Bahamas, Jamaica, the Solomon Islands, and Antigua and Barbuda would also vote to remove Charles as head of state, the poll suggests. The reasoning for the results appears varied. Some respondents in Caribbean countries cited past colonialism as the motivation for their answers, while elsewhere people said that they believed becoming a republic would bring tangible benefits. Canada was among four countries An Australian respondent told the survey: “Britain is just like a distant memory. If anything, we’re just following in the footsteps of whatever the US is doing.” A Canadian citizen argued that the monarchy is “no longer real to the modern day.” A separate poll conducted by Ashcroft ahead of Saturday’s coronation of Charles found that support for the monarchy in Britain remains high, but this appears to be in stark contrast to the sentiment beyond the UK’s borders. [The Truth about The British Monarchy] Of the other countries within the king’s realm, almost all of them had only marginal support for the monarchy. These include New Zealand, Belize, and Papua New Guinea. Only two of the 14 countries surveyed – Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tuvalu – said that they would Source: RT via The Intel Drop – Almost half of British Commonwealth wants to ditch monarchy – poll Apparently, back in 2022, Charles already said this was all right with him: Charles tells Commonwealth it’s fine to ditch monarchy and become a republic2022 June – Prince Charles has told the countries which still have the Queen as Head of State that they can transition to a republic should they so wish. The prince, who is the future Head of the Commonwealth, says the process can happen “calmly and without rancour”. He will address the leaders of all Commonwealth countries at the CHOGM summit – the Commonwealth Heads Of Government Meeting – in Kigali. There are 54 nations in the Commonwealth but there are 14 countries outside the UK which are Commonwealth Realms – where the British Monarch remains the Head of State. Last year, Barbados replaced the Queen with a president as it chose to become a republic. The Jamaican Prime Minister, Andrew Holness, recently told Prince William and Kate on their Caribbean tour that he wanted his country to go the same way. Australia has recently elected a prime minister, Anthony Albanese, who has expressed a wish to become a republic. Prince Charles, who is representing the Queen at the summit in Rwanda, will tell other Commonwealth leaders: “The benefit of long life brings me the experience that arrangements such as these can change, calmly and without rancour.” Charles was at the transition ceremony in Barbados in November last year when the Queen was replaced with a president at a midnight ceremony. Those Realms include Australia, New Zealand, Belize, Jamaica and Canada. The Prince of Wales will tell the Opening Ceremony of the CHOGM summit in Rwanda: “I want to say clearly, as I have said before, that each member’s constitutional arrangement, as republic or monarchy, is purely a matter for each member country to decide.” The heir to the throne has expressed similar sentiments before but it is the timing which is crucial, given the increasing desire from some countries for a change in their constitutional arrangements with the UK. Source: ITVX – Charles tells Commonwealth it’s fine to ditch monarchy and become a republic The Real King – Christ – will gather the nations, not separate them – The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms. 5 May 2023 Update – The Jamaican government will introduce a bill next month to sever the country’s ties with the British monarchy, possibly removing Charles as the head of state by 2024, legal and constitutional minister Marlene Malahoo Forte told Sky News on Thursday. RELATED: Summer is Near – Throne of Israel 1948 No Charles? No Problem. Gibraltar Governor King ChristThe post Almost half of British Commonwealth wants to ditch monarchy appeared first on Gibraltar Messenger. |
SearchUser loginCategories
- New
World
Order
- Agencies, Commissions... - The UN - Jewry, "Israel", Zionism... - The Middle East - Secret Societies - Illuminati * Skull and Bones - The Vatican - Control - Brainwashing *MKULTRA - Drugs - Feminism - Homosexuality - Television - The USA - JFK - The EU - China - Fake Terror - 911 - London 7/7 *Oklahoma '95 *Pearl Harbor - Archaeology & History - The Ark of The Covenant - Books - Disarmament of the people - Environmental - Genetically Modified... - God's Law/Torah - Manmade Law - Audio & Video - Money, Banking, The Fed, IMF - Science & Technology - Energy, Oil... - MERLib.org *Microsoft Echelon - Spiritual - Health - Aspartame - Chemtrails - Fluoride - HIV / AIDS - Vaccines - Finland / Suomi - Quote Collection Recommended sites: |
The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan against the traitorous N. W. O. Zion-Nazi mass-murder, inside-job perpetrators of OKC, 911, Bali, 7/7/2005 and the phoney War on Terror and Freedom, and reinstate God's Perfect Laws of Liberty and bring the perpetrators to Justice.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains some copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to expose and advance the understanding of the issues covered here. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material.
Technical details about the site
100777.com is also available as a hidden Tor service (?) at truth77k52rbo3ov.onion/
