This is a dissemination of an extremely interesting article found at http://www.takeourworldback.com/77suicidebombershoax/ by an unnamed author, but who I believe is Robert John Aumann of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Centre for Rationality.
One of the points that doesn’t do more than poke its nose out, is the animosity held by the writer towards the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, possibly due to Sharon’s moves to withdraw Israeli settlers from within Gaza, a point that Benjamin Netanyahu also vigorously opposed.
After the London bombing, Benjamin Netanyahu returned to Israel and on the 7th August 2005, 33 days after the London bombing, Netanyahu resigned as the Finance Minister under Ariel Sharon, but immediately took steps to displace Sharon as Prime Minister, beginning with his attempt to gain leadership of the Likud party, which would have removed Sharon from the position of Prime Minister.
However, for Benjamin Netanyahu to continue his political career, he had to overcome the major gaffe he made in London on the 7th July, 2005 when he stated that he had been ‘warned’ in regard to the London bombing.
Andrew S. MacGregor
9/11 faked FL 93 radio transmissions
Smoking Gun Proves "Arab Hijacker" Calls From United Airlines Flight 98 Were Faked
listen to audio tape recording of the FAA radio transmission for yourself at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnfQfBhfrMw&feature=related
FAA Air traffic controller tape recording of the radio communication between them and flight 93.- The single-channel working tape from the Cleveland's archives.
During the sentencing phase of the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the contents of the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93 were played for the jury. On April 12, the government released a transcript of the recording, but not the recording itself.
The initial two calls from United Flight 93 to the Cleveland FAA air traffic control center regarding cruising altitude and conflicting traffic are genuine, then there is a very strong case for claiming the later calls about a "bomb" did NOT originate from the same aircraft.
The quality of the first transmission is Signal strength 5, Readability 5, (5/5) while the quality of the later "bomb" transmissions is at best 5/1.
It is ridiculous to claim that transmission quality would [or could] drop suddenly from 5/5 to 5/1 because a mythical "hijacker" was "excited". This crafted radio signal deterioration and loud carrier interference is far more likely to be the work of an unidentified "special effects" department,
Because the Cleveland Air Traffic Controller and also pilots from different airlines heard the screams that we did not hear on the U-Tube audio tape, it proves they were transmitted by someone using the emergency frequency of 121.5 Megahertz. This is because radio frequency 121.5 mhz is recorded on another FAA tape recording of the only that frequency.
Cleveland Center and each the individual airliner's radios were tuned to the FAA Cleveland frequencey. Airliners and FAA's Cleveland air traffic control center could not be working two different frequencies at the same time. The only possibility left is the common frequency of 121.5 Megahertz, which was monitored by everyone on the day.
Airliners and air traffic controllers can monitor [listen to] this emergency frequency at all times. You can listen to the guard receiver, but you cannot talk on it.
This "guard" receiver works in parallel at 110% volume, ensuring all aircrew and controllers hear emergency messages on 121.5 over [louder than] their other radio activities. This was the "attention getter" for the scam, and it certainly worked.
Forget mythical hijackers transmitting on this emergency frequency "by mistake" because it cannot happen. If you have a real emergency and need to tell the world in a hurry, you must first dial up 121.5 Megahertz physically on one of the main VHF radios, and then transmit. So whoever pulled this misleading scam was quite deliberately using two entirely different frequencies in sequence, one after the other.
To start the ball rolling the perpetrators deliberately used the emergency channel because everyone within radio range would hear the "screams" on guard, regardless of whether they were transmitting or receiving on another working frequency at the same time.
We know from the transcript that Cleveland Center heard the "screams", as did United 797 and 1523, American 1060 and Executive 956. So let us look at this again.
The Cleveland ground controller heard the "screams", as did the crews of aircraft belonging to three different airlines, but there is no record of the screams on the Cleveland Center tape of the working FAA channel that we listened to on U-tube.
Case proved.
The perpetrators knew the tape recording of their transmissions would eventually be examined by NTSB and FAA investigators. The trick here is to notice their exact timing.
"Panicky Hijackers" have no regard at all for correct radio telephony procedures because they don't know what they are, so any genuine uncoordinated "panicky" transmissions would have certainly overlapped other aircraft communications on this busy channel, resulting in severely distorted and partly unreadable threats.
You can hear this occurring if you listen to the U-tube tape.
The pilots were not sure that they heard what the first radio transmission stated. Pilots and Cleveland were heard asking each other what was said. Their back and forth talk made it sound like the hijacker's first transmission may not have gotten heard. The perpetrators must have heard that the pilots and Cleveland were not sure what they heard, so they repleated their transmission.
Flight 93: "unreadable.... we have a bomb on board...uh sit."
The perpetrators needed the world to CLEARLY HEAR on FAA tape recordings them ordering passengers and mentioning a "bomb", etc. They needed the evidence of Arab hijackers to be recorded to prove to the world they actually done it. So they repeated their radio transmission:
Fl 93.. CLEARLY "Ah.. This is the captain. I want you all to remain seated. We have a bomb on board. ..(unreadable )... airport... our demands... and remain quiet."
This was sold to the America public as an error by the hijackers who did not want to transmit via the jets radio, but to use the airplane intercom.
Also notice on the tape itself, that each of the two "we have a bomb on board" messages is very carefully inserted BETWEEN transmissions from Cleveland Center and the other aircraft. There is not the slightest trace of overlap.
Though a "panicky hijacker" might accidentally manage this once with a long garbled transmission, the odds of him doing it twice in a row in a ten-minute period are impossible...more than ten million-to-one against it happening.
http://100777.com/node/244