The following is commentary by Whatreallyhappened.com about the incidence with the photoshopped photo of Beirut in 2006. We at 100777.com couldn't agree more.

Looking back at the Public Relations aspect of the recent debacle in Lebanon, one incident deserves a final parting examination. And that is the furor that erupted over a Reuter's photograph of Beirut that was obviously doctored.

In the above, the top panel is the original photograph, and the bottom is what Reuter's released. The obviousness of the alteration quickly attracted notice and the photographer was suspended and Reuter's withdrew the photo. Isdrael then claimed that all the work done by Reuiter's in Lebanon, in particulat the Qana massacre, was now suspect.

How very convenient.

My "day job" is in an industry that is expert at image trickery. I work in film visual effects. It was that expertise that resulted in my outing of the Vincent Foster murder almost 14 years ago and launched this website.

But one does not need to be an expert to see that the altered photo is altered. Someone used the rubber stamp brush in Photoshop to swirl the clouds around, causing the repeating pattern seen in the plumes.

Why?

Take a look at the original image. Does it need alternation or enhancement? Do the changes made with photoshop in any way alter the content or meaning of the photo, or make the captionm more or less appropriate? No. The alteration has no purpose at all ... except to call attention to itself, at a time when Israel desperately needed to discredit the reports coming out of Lebanon.

One final point. Photographers do not select which of their photos get published and which so not. That decision is made by numerous other people, including the photo editor, the section editor, and finally the managing editor. For this photo to have gone out, many people had to sign off on it. Do you really think that the altered photo got all the way through Reuter's management, office staff, photo editors, webmasters, etc. without someone noticing the obvious signs of fakery?

Me neither.

This fake was designed to be spotted. It was put out by Reuter's intentionally with the sole purpose of handing Israel a means to discount media reports of the war crimes being committed inside Lebanon.

Who in Reuter's put the welfare of Israel above their oen company's credibility, I wonder?

Thursday, September 07, 2006

By Mark Meza
http://enterthealternativemedia.blogspot.com/2006/09/good-bye-main-stream-media-hello.html

Many mainstream television programs today claim to offer the viewer an impartial approach on any given issue, this just isn’t true, there is no longer any such thing as an unbiased television program in the MSM [mainstream media]. For all intents and purposes every network is subservient to its owners and management, which is largely pro-Zionist in our contemporary world. Many people like to point out that the networks are “owned,” by stockholders and “managed,” by a “Board of Directors,” and that the only bias they have is one directed at profit. When I hear this I feel it necessary to point out that Enron was also a publicly traded corporation and it too had a Board of Directors. Despite this it only took a few individuals at the very top to drive the corporation into the ground. In other words Enron stockholders had no say whatsoever in the direction Enron was taking, if they had, the corporation wouldn’t have gone bankrupt, it’s really ! a matter of economics 101, stockholders aren’t interested in pursuing policies that will reduce their holdings by more than a thousand percent, but nonetheless, that’s exactly what happened at Enron. The television networks are also in theory “owned,” by stockholders, but the networks are managed by hardcore Zionists whose sole agenda is as un-American and downright treasonous as anything any enemy of this country could ever perpetrate on the people of this nation.

by Michel Chossudovsky

September 4, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca

Israel's war on Lebanon is an integral part of a US sponsored "military roadmap". 

The war on Lebanon, which has resulted in countless atrocities including the destruction of the nation's economy and civilian infrastructure, is "a stage" in a sequence of carefully planned military operations. 

Lebanon constitutes a strategic corridor between Israel and North-western Syria. The underlying objective of this war was the militarization of Lebanon, including the stationing of foreign troops, as a precondition for carrying out the next phase of a broader military agenda. 

Formally under a UN mandate, the foreign troops to be stationed on Lebanese soil on the immediate border with Syria, will be largely although not exclusively from NATO countries. This military force mandated by the UN Security Council is by no means neutral. It responds directly to US and Israeli interests. 

Moreover, the timely withdrawal of Syrian troops, following the February 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri has contributed to opening up a "new space". The withdrawal of Syrian troops served Israeli interests. The timely pullout was of strategic significance: it was a major factor in the timing and planning of the July 2006 IDF attacks on Lebanon. 

In the aftermath of the Israeli bombings and the "ceasefire", UN Security Council Resolution 1701, drafted by France and the US in close consultation with the Israeli government, has paved the way for the militarization of Lebanon, under a bogus UN mandate. 

The Next Phase of the Middle East War

Confirmed by official statements and military documents, the US in close coordination with Britain (and in consultation with its NATO partners), is planning to launch a war directed against Iran and Syria. US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has already initiated the draft of a UN Security Council resolution with a view to imposing sanctions on Tehran for its alleged (nonexistent) nuclear weapons program. Whether this resolution is adopted is not the main issue. The US may decide to proceed in defiance of the Security Council, following a veto by Russia and/or China. The vote of France and Britain, among the permanent members has already been secured. 

Please follow the weblink for the complete article

This is a letter from Paul Grubach to Amnesty International.

August 16, 2006
Amnesty International

D-53108

Bonn
Germany

Sir/Madame:

I have been informed that one of the main purposes of your organization is to defend human rights worldwide. I am writing to you now to inform you of a very serious human rights violation that is taking place in your own nation, and to request that you would publicly speak out about it.

Mr. Germar Rudolf, a former chemistry doctoral candidate at the prestigious Max Planck Institute, is a German citizen who was forced to flee his native Germany because he has questioned and refuted certain aspects of the Jewish Holocaust story. In short, I believe that he showed that the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers never existed. In the United States, near Chicago, Revisionist scholar Rudolf was recently torn from his American wife and their child and delivered to Germany. He is in prison in Stuttgart.

George Galloway has spoken out in support of Lebanon, saying he believes Hizbollah is justified in defending Lebanon against Israeli attacks. The Respect MP also lambasted media coverage of the war and said the UN resolution means nothing.

via Kurtnimmo.com

Note how the techies at Murdoch’s Sky News potted down the volume on Galloway, as he made too much sense and was cleaning the anchor’s clock, and then brought up the volume of b-roll footage to drown him out. You’d think, by now, the corporate media would steer clear of Galloway, as he consisently tells the truth, a forbidden fruit in the fraudulent “war on terror,” that is to say state-sponsored terrorism against Arabs and Muslims resisting the murderous aggression of Israel and the United States.

alternative download
alternative download

Also see this commentary by Daryl Bradford Smith
"If Zionists control the media, then why would George Galloway be allowed to criticize Israel on mainstream television or radio?"

Introduktion
Benjamin H. Freedman var en av 1900-talets mest fascinerande och häpnadsväckande personer. Freedman, född 1890, var en framgångsrik judisk affärsman från New York och stod som huvudägare till Woodbury Soap Company när det begav sig. Han bröt med den organiserade judendomen efter den judisk-kommunistiska segern 1945, och tillbringade återstoden av sitt liv, samt merparten av sin ansenliga förmögenhet på minst 2,5 miljoner dollar, med att exponera det judiska förtrycket som kommit att inhölja Förenta Staterna. Freedman visste vad han talade om eftersom han varit en insider på högsta nivå i judiska organisationer och judiska intriger för att erövra makten i vår nation. Freedman var personligen bekant med Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy och många fler pådrivare och omstörtare i vår tid. Det här talet hölls inför en patriotisk åhörarskara 1961 på Willard Hotel i staden Washington å Conde McGinleys patriotiska tidskrift Common Senses vägnar. Även om detta vittomspännande och oförberedda tal har blivit föråldrat i vissa mindre avseenden är Freedmans väsentliga budskap till oss -- hans varning till Väst -- mer angeläget än någonsin tidigare.
-- K.A.S.

Innehållsförteckning

Sionisterna styr Förenta Staterna

Första Världskriget

Dödläge år 1916. Sionisterna erbjuder att gå Förenta Staterna med i krig

Förenta staterna tvingas med i Första Världskriget efter Balfourdeklarationen.

Versailles

Effekten på tyskarna å de förstod judisk aktivitet

Freedman säger att det första världskiget drogs igång mot Tyskland.

Tyska fångläger år 1933

Tyskar bekämpade judisk kontroll.

1933: Judar förklarar heligt krig (och handelskrig) mot Tyskland

Reichskristallnacht samt upprustning

1961: Kärnvapenkrig? För Israel?

Sekretess (likt sionist avtalet med Förenta Staterna) kan inträffa igen

Historia om "judar"

Kol Nidre: Bevis om otrogenhet

George Washington's Vision

Sionisterna styr Förenta Staterna

Här i Förenta Staterna har sionisterna och deras religionsfränder total kontroll över vår regering. Av många anledningar, för många och alltför komplexa för att gå närmare in på här och nu, styr sionisterna och deras religionsfränder Förenta Staterna som vore de det här landets enväldiga monarker. Det kan hända att ni menar att detta är ett allt för generellt uttalande, men låt mig visa er vad som hände medan vi alla sov.

by Curt Maynard

From this writer’s perspective the absolute best thing to come out of the Presidency of George W. Bush is the fact that so many liberal Democrats have changed their position on gun control. It’s as if the scales were lifted from their eyes, they realized that government itself could no longer be trusted, they witnessed the election of 2000 hijacked, and four years later they saw the same thing happen again without nary a word of dissent from the Democratic candidates. Former gun grabbers in the hundreds of thousands no longer feel the intense desire to disarm their fellow citizens in the name of a better society, in fact many of them have since armed themselves and joined gun clubs and gun lobbies. Good for them. These liberal Democrats now understand the true nature and purpose of the Second Amendment, it was never designed to enable us to obtain wild game whenever and wherever we liked, it was always about being able to defend ourselves from a corrupt and evil ! government. Guess what? That government is here! http://i.am/jah/politics.htm

Even the stupidest American now understands that there is no real difference between the Democans and Republicrats at the highest levels, if one is against unrestricted illegal immigration, which fully eighty percent of all Americans are [A true bipartisan issue], one is compelled to vote for some pro-Israel and pro-war Republican piece of filth that only recently changed his position on the immigration issue in order to get enough votes from the majority to get reelected or to belly over, surrender America’s sovereignty and allow some pro-Israel, pro-war piece of Democratic filth to open the flood gates to the Third World. The Republican will only change his/her mind yet again after the election and vote for some Kennedy sponsored bill that grants amnesty to criminals and spits in the face of the American electorate!

You might think that such a strongly-worded statement sent by more than five-dozen United Nations workers to the "Middle East's only democracy" would be highly newsworthy. Apparently not. Among the very few media outlets to cover it were Reuters, the BBC, the Independent (London), Ha'aretz (Jerusalem), and the Jerusalem Post. Notice that all these sources are British or Israeli. Not one American media outlet has covered the story.

Below, I have excerpted all of the direct quotes from the petition that are used in the articles. Below that, you'll find what seems to be the full text of the petition, which was posted to IndyMedia Israel. While I, of course, cannot vouch for the authenticity of that posting, it does contain all of the quotations from news articles.

Follow weblink below for the complete article

Found on the net,
July 26, 2006

The face of a Zionist (counterfeit-)Jewish girl, ably captured by a passing Reuters cameraman, radiates wondrous joy as she writes her name, "with love", on a missile of death. Moments later, the object of her erotic fascination smashes and shatters the bodies of two Lebanese toddlers near a playschool, whose only crime was not belonging to the Synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9). The missiles were made in "Christian" America and were delivered by "Christian" American hardware.

 The outlaw state of (counterfeit-)Israel, rapaciously conceived in the blood of native Palestinians and in mocking disobedience to God's biblical prohibition on a Jewish homeland, continues to disfigure and distort this fallen creation, filling the world with a vile and cankering stench of death and a darkness so pernicious that it blackens the fairest of hearts. Yet not one nation has rallied to the defence of Lebanon, neither Arab nor European, neither Asian nor Pan-American. Oh, I heard the cynically nuanced calls for restraint and saw the scented garlands heaped on high by the scabrous, money-obsessed, mentally ill prostitutes that have the barefaced effrontery to call themselves national leaders.
http://i.am/jah/politics.htm

compiled by Jeffrey Blankfort

MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and chair of th! e Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.

LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.

My name is Edgar J. Steele.  This is a Nickel Rant.

I can't take it anymore. 

Every morning, I sit at this keyboard and think this will be the day I rant about Israel's genocidal insanity and how George Bush splashes my hands with blood in furtherance of that derangement.

Then I feel a flush as my blood pressure starts moving up.  I take one of those little pink pills the doctor prescribed.  I walk around, swearing.  I sit down.  I get up.  I mutter and stare at the ceiling. 

I close my eyes tightly and try to push them back into my brain with my eyelids (old headache remedy).

I imagine little flecks of spittle collecting at the corners of my mouth.

This isn't writer's block.  Sometimes, I wish I would get writer's block.  That's when I picture myself blissfully settling into that chair on the back porch, drink in one hand and a good book in the other.  No such luck.  I feel more like a 4-inch hole in the fence through which about fifty cats simultaneously are trying to squeeze.  Usually, they take turns.  Not this time, though.

Have I finally lost it?  I cannot begin to tell you how much I loathe and detest George W. Bush and virtually every single Administration figure you might think to name.  And those morons in Congress, not to mention all those damnable lobbyists pushing Israel down their blood-sucking throats.  And judges...and lawyers...and state officials...and local bureaucrats.  Gahhhhhhh!!!

Iranians see only hypocrisy from the world's nuclear  powers

  by James C. Moore

via http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0430-22.htm
 
  Published on Sunday, April 30, 2006 by the Independent

   
  As international political powers seek Iran's capitulation on nuclear weapons development, little notice is given to what the Americans and the British have done to create this crisis nor what steps the Israelis might eventually take to make it profoundly more complicated.

  Iran's antipathy toward the West did not spontaneously generate out of the crazed rhetoric of radical mullahs. It has been spurred by what Iranians see as hypocrisy on the part of members of the world's nuclear community, and the bumbled meddling of the US and UK in Iranian affairs for more than a half century.

  Iran is dangerous, but the British and the Americans have helped to make it that way. And the situation is even more precarious than it  appears.

  Shortly after the Gulf War in 1991, Germany gave (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel two of its diesel-powered Dolphin-class submarines. The Israelis agreed to purchase a third at a greatly reduced price. In November 2005, Germany announced that it was selling two more subs to (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel for $1.2bn (£660m).

 Defense analysts have suggested the Dolphin-class boats are a means for (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel to have a second-strike capability from the sea if any of its land-based defence systems are hit by enemy nuclear weapons.  Unfortunately, the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war is geopolitically afoot: (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel and the American president might not be willing to wait until after the first shot is fired.  

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=37543

 
By Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press
Christopher Bollyn is an investigative journalist for Washington-based American Free Press.

Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox (counterfeit-)Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

It was no surprise that the United States and (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel walked out of a United Nations conference on racism as soon as (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel came in for criticism. It is, however, a disgrace.

(The counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel certainly is a racist state. Its own human-rights advocates call it that. The claim that (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel doesn't discriminate against non-Jews is absurd on its face.

Suppose, for example, the U. S. Congress passed a law that said the United States is a Christian, Anglo-Saxon nation and that any Christian, Anglo-Saxon person anywhere in the world is automatically eligible to become a citizen. Do you seriously think the Anti-Defamation League would not have a conniption fit and scream racism? Well, (the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel has such a law for Jews.

In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, part of their plan leading to its fulfillment is the discrediting of politicians, so they can bring in their false messiah.

We are quite possibly in that final stage now. They could not have picked a better stooge for this than Shrub.

http://i.am/jah/illumin.htm#Protocols

Protocol 10 – Preparing for Power

16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so, besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government constitutional working, the pretext, both for the one and the other, being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State.

17. By such measure we shall obtain the power of destroying, little by little, step by step, all; that at the outset, when we enter on our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States; to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into our despotism.

18. The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the constitution; the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence – a matter which we shall arrange for – of their rulers, will clamour: "Away with them and give us one king over all the Earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders – frontiers; nationalities; religions; State debts – who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives."

19. But you yourselves know perfectly well, that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes, by all the nations, it is indispensable, to trouble, in all countries, the people's relations with their governments, so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension; hatred; struggle; envy and even by the use of torture; by starvation; by the inoculation of disease; by want, so that the goyim see no other course open to them than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.

20. But if we give the nations of the world a breathing-space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive.