Written, Reported & Edited by Richard Jeffs, with additions for Gibraltar Messenger.

https://gibraltar-messenger.net/film/stakeholder-communism/

Richard Jeffs – I made this short film to demonstrate the influence the World Economic Forum has over the two major UK parties. Both are undemocratically driving the transition to an authoritarian political system called Stakeholder Capitalism; that’s what  you’re voting for with Labour and Conservatives (Deut. 5:32).

The killing fields in the Middle East aren’t just about bringing down the Muslim nations. They were designed specifically to bring down and enslave America and Britain. In just examining the world revolts since WW1, subversive agents and plots were ALWAYS at play. Shame on us for not seeing the underlying goals of rogue secret societies gone mad, because payback is coming.

Who imagined that in 2009, the world's governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the US to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth. But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labelling as "one of the great menaces of our times" have an extraordinary story to tell – and some justice on their side.

by Michel Chossudovsky

September 4, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca

Israel's war on Lebanon is an integral part of a US sponsored "military roadmap". 

The war on Lebanon, which has resulted in countless atrocities including the destruction of the nation's economy and civilian infrastructure, is "a stage" in a sequence of carefully planned military operations. 

Lebanon constitutes a strategic corridor between Israel and North-western Syria. The underlying objective of this war was the militarization of Lebanon, including the stationing of foreign troops, as a precondition for carrying out the next phase of a broader military agenda. 

Formally under a UN mandate, the foreign troops to be stationed on Lebanese soil on the immediate border with Syria, will be largely although not exclusively from NATO countries. This military force mandated by the UN Security Council is by no means neutral. It responds directly to US and Israeli interests. 

Moreover, the timely withdrawal of Syrian troops, following the February 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri has contributed to opening up a "new space". The withdrawal of Syrian troops served Israeli interests. The timely pullout was of strategic significance: it was a major factor in the timing and planning of the July 2006 IDF attacks on Lebanon. 

In the aftermath of the Israeli bombings and the "ceasefire", UN Security Council Resolution 1701, drafted by France and the US in close consultation with the Israeli government, has paved the way for the militarization of Lebanon, under a bogus UN mandate. 

The Next Phase of the Middle East War

Confirmed by official statements and military documents, the US in close coordination with Britain (and in consultation with its NATO partners), is planning to launch a war directed against Iran and Syria. US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has already initiated the draft of a UN Security Council resolution with a view to imposing sanctions on Tehran for its alleged (nonexistent) nuclear weapons program. Whether this resolution is adopted is not the main issue. The US may decide to proceed in defiance of the Security Council, following a veto by Russia and/or China. The vote of France and Britain, among the permanent members has already been secured. 

 

Please follow the weblink for the complete article

To Whom it may concern,

I hope this finds you all well and in good spirit.

Last night I tuned in the nightly national news on ABC. I rarely do this but, with things developing as quickly as they are, I am starting to consider monitoring the mainstream news more closely. We are being "noticed"/warned.

For months I had been hearing/reading about the trouble in which General Motors finds itself. Last night, ABC reported GM will be closing 9 plants which will effectively evaporate 30,000 jobs. Workers at the OKC facility were in shock as was Oklahoma's governor. Three more plants are to be closed in Canada. Reportedly GM has lost billions this past year and their credit is now "junk".

The report continued saying, Ford will be making similar announcements, soon, also. How far behind will be Chrysler announcements?

This, of course, was/is disturbing news as it was once said, "As General Motors goes.., so goes the country." Lee Iacocca [former president of Ford Motor Co. and former CEO of Chrysler] said of GM.., "it is so large, it is a country unto itself." [Iacocca has recently come out of retirement and has been seen doing national TV commercials for Chrysler/Daimler.]

Like a footnote.., it was added; old, established companies [paying high wages to long-term employees and massive retirement/pension plans {including medical}] CANNOT compete with the new companies [that do not have these debt/burdens -{ never mind foreign economies}].

But more disturbing to me was ABC's report at the end of the broadcast regarding China.., specifically what is being taught in public schools.

By mapping our genome/DNA to know what makes us tick [the humans we are currently locked inside], and also developing technology of mind-blowing proportions, a Brave New World is on the horizon; but it´s not one that would appeal to us in any way, shape, or form.