History of modern man unravels as German scholar is exposed as fraud
Flamboyant anthropologist falsified dating of key discoveries
Luke Harding in Berlin
Saturday February 19 2005
The Guardian
It appeared to be one of archaeology's most sensational finds. The
skull fragment discovered in a peat bog near Hamburg was more than
36,000 years old - and was the vital missing link between modern humans
and Neanderthals.
This, at least, is what Professor Reiner Protsch von Zieten - a
distinguished, cigar-smoking German anthropologist - told his
scientific colleagues, to global acclaim, after being invited to date
the extremely rare skull.
However, the professor's 30-year-old academic career has now ended in
disgrace after the revelation that he systematically falsified the
dates on this and numerous other "stone age" relics.
http://jahtruth.net/newgr.htm
Yesterday his university in Frankfurt announced the professor had been
forced to retire because of numerous "falsehoods and manipulations".
According to experts, his deceptions may mean an entire tranche of the
history of man's development will have to be rewritten.
"Anthropology is going to have to completely revise its picture of
modern man between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago," said Thomas Terberger,
the archaeologist who discovered the hoax. "Prof Protsch's work
appeared to prove that anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals had
co-existed, and perhaps even had children together. This now appears to
be rubbish."
http://jahtruth.net/evolut.htm
The scandal only came to light when Prof Protsch was caught trying to
sell his department's entire chimpanzee skull collection to the United
States.
An inquiry later established that he had also passed off fake fossils
as real ones and had plagiarised other scientists' work.
His discovery appeared to show that Neanderthals had spread much
further north than was previously known.
But his university inquiry was told that a crucial Hamburg skull
fragment, which was believed to have come from the world's oldest
German, a Neanderthal known as Hahnhöfersand Man, was actually
a mere 7,500 years old, according to Oxford University's radiocarbon
dating unit. The unit established that other skulls had been wrongly
dated too.
Another of the professor's sensational finds, "Binshof-Speyer" woman,
lived in 1,300 BC and not 21,300 years ago, as he had claimed, while
"Paderborn-Sande man" (dated at 27,400 BC) only died a couple of
hundred years ago, in 1750.
"It's deeply embarrassing. Of course the university feels very bad
about this," Professor Ulrich Brandt, who led the investigation into
Prof Protsch's activities, said yesterday. "Prof Protsch refused to
meet us. But we had 10 sittings with 12 witnesses.
"Their stories about him were increasingly bizarre. After a while it
was hard to take it seriously. You had to laugh. It was just
unbelievable. At the end of the day what he did was incredible."
During their investigation, the university discovered that Prof
Protsch, 65, a flamboyant figure with a fondness for gold watches,
Porsches and Cuban cigars, was unable to work his own carbon-dating
machine.
Instead, after returning from Germany to America, where he did his
doctorate, and taking up a professorship, he had simply made things up.
In one case he had claimed that a 50 million-year-old "half-ape" called
Adapis had been found in Switzerland, an archaeological sensation. In
reality, the ape had been dug up in France, where several other
examples had already been found.
Prof Terberger said that he grew suspicious about the professor's work
in 2001 after sending off the skull fragment to Oxford for tests.
Further tests revealed that all of the skulls dated by Prof Protsch
were in reality far younger than he had claimed, prompting Prof
Terberger and a British colleague, Martin Street, to write a scientific
paper last year.
At the same time, German police began investigating the professor for
fraud, following allegations that he had tried to sell the university's
278 chimpanzee skulls for $70,000 to a US dealer.
Why, though, had he done it?
"If you find a skull that's more than 30,000 years old it's a
sensation. If you find three of them people notice you. It's good for
your career," Prof Terberger said. "At the end of the day it was about
ambition."
Other details of the professor's life also appeared to crumble under
scrutiny. Before he disappeared from the university's campus last year,
Prof Protsch told his students he had examined Hitler's and Eva Braun's
bones.
He also boasted of having flats in New York, Florida and California,
where, he claimed, he hung out with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Steffi
Graf. Even the professor's aristocratic title, "von Zieten", appears to
be bogus.
Far from being the descendant of a dashing general in the hussars, the
professor was the son of a Nazi MP, Wilhelm Protsch, Der Spiegel
magazine revealed last October.
The university is investigating how thousands of documents lodged in
the anthropology department relating to the Nazis' gruesome scientific
experiments in the 1930s were mysteriously shredded, allegedly under
the professor's instructions.
They also discovered that some of the 12,000 skeletons stored in the
department's "bone cellar" were missing their heads, apparently sold to
friends of the professor in the US and sympathetic dentists.
Yesterday the university admitted that it should have discovered the
professor's fabrications far earlier. But it pointed out that, like all
public servants in Germany, the high-profile anthropologist was
virtually impossible to sack, and had also proved difficult to pin
down.
"He was perfect at being evasive," Prof Brandt said yesterday. "He
would switch from saying 'it isn't really clear' to giving diffuse
statements.
"I'm not a psychologist so I can't say why he did it. But my guess is
that when he came back from the States 30 years ago he realised he
wasn't up to the job of being a professor. So he started inventing
things. It rapidly became a habit.'
Yesterday the professor, who lives in Mainz with his wife Angelina,
didn't respond to emails from the Guardian asking him to comment on the
affair. But in earlier remarks to Der Spiegel he insisted that he was
the victim of an "intrigue".
"All the disputed fossils are my personal property," he told the
magazine.
Missing links and planted stone age finds
Piltdown Man
The most infamous of all scientific frauds was unearthed in 1912 in a
Sussex gravel pit. With its huge human-like braincase and ape-like jaw,
the Piltdown Man "fossil" was named Eoanthropus dawsoni after Charles
Dawson, the solicitor and amateur archaeologist who discovered it. For
40 years Piltdown Man was heralded as the missing link between humans
and their primate ancestors. But in 1953 scientists concluded it was a
forgery. Radiocarbon dating showed the human skull was just 600 years
old, while the jawbone was that of an orang-utan. The entire package of
fossil fragments found at Piltdown - which included a prehistoric
cricket bat - had been planted.
The devil's archaeologist
Japanese archaeologist Shinichi Fujimura was so
prolific at
uncovering prehistoric artefacts he earned the nickname "God's hands".
At site after site, Fujimura discovered stoneware and relics that
pushed back the limits of Japan's known history. The researcher and his
stone age finds drew international attention and rewrote text books. In
November 2000 the spell was broken when a newspaper printed pictures of
Fujimura digging holes and burying objects that he later dug up and
announced as major finds. "I was tempted by the devil. I don't know how
I can apologise for what I did," he said.
Piltdown Turkey
The supposed fossil of Archaeoraptor, which was to
become known as
the "Piltdown turkey", came to light in 1999 when National Geographic
magazine published an account of its discovery. It seemed to show
another missing link - this time between birds and dinosaurs.
Archaeoraptor appeared to be the remains of a large feathered bird with
the tail of a dinosaur. The fossil was smuggled out of China and sold
to a private collector in the US for $51,000. Experts were suspicious
and closer examination showed the specimen to be a "composite" - two
fossils stuck together with strong glue.
David Adam
Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited
http://www.guardian.co.uk



Post new comment