Manmade Law
Illegal, Fraudulent, Corrupt, Selfish
created 13/01/2004 - 15:27, updated 13/01/2004 - 15:30 by cybe
To All,
I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.
Regarding the following post.., I don't know about you but I have thought about "where does this [law-making] end"? After 9-1-1 I read something about terrorism I found to be interesting. Perhaps you will also. The thrust of the article had to do with a study done on the concept/use of terrorism. Pretty simple actually. Let us say we were being terrorized by a source outside of the U.S. The world knows the U.S. has the most formidable military this planet has ever seen. It is the "elephant". In other words a "frontal assault" would be suicide. Small, sustained "terrorist attacks" won't seem to do much to this "elephant" BUT, the "terrorized people" ASK for more and more "protection" from their governments and governments do respond with more and more laws and soon, the "terrorized society" has a police-state that is so out-of-control repressive.., the people rise up in rebellion and the country is destroyed from within. This concept/use of terrorism is easily linked to the Hegalian Dialectic.., "Problem", "Reaction", "Solution". It has been used for centuries flawlessly.
Most, if not all of you are aware (the NWOdor OPERATING THROUGH) the U.S. government, at the very least, was complicit with the 1993 attempt to bomb the World Trade Center buildings, the bombing of the Murrah Building in OKC and 9-1-1. And most of you are aware of the plans of the NWOdor to destroy Amerika and reduce the world population by 85%. Hopefully you can see how all of the pieces to this world puzzle fit. From the elitist/globalist point of view, this planet cannot "sustain" an ever growing population and there is certainly truth in that position, so, they intend to play god's and DO something about it. We are experiencing the unfolding of their plan. How do you like it so far?
There is only one way to end this madness; ENFORCE "THE PLAN" @ www.i.am/jah/plan.htm
Please read on.
LLTF,
Roland
Let's tell legislators: There ought to be a freedom
by Mari Werner
Imagine a world where there are laws against eating too many sweets, standing on the top step of the ladder, or failing to show up for your doctor appointment. If you want to change your job or residence, you have to hire a lawyer to fill out and file the sheaf of forms required.
Imagine a world where every murder or assault trial requires years of litigation just to determine the charges. There's a different law for every location, weapon, and motivation. (Was it motivated by hate, gender, race, greed, stupidity, or some other syndromes or state of mind?)
Imagine a world where whole sections of large cities have been devoted just to housing the law library.
How far is this world from the one you live in?
Congress has been averaging about 235 new laws per year, and the California state legislature passed close to 1,000 laws last year alone. Has there ever been a session of Congress or any state legislature that ended with fewer laws on the books than there were at the beginning? Where is this leading?
Deuteronomy 4:2, The King of king's Bible Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you.
12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.
Our legislatures are passing laws on top of the laws that are already there just to make political points. The California legislature recently passed a law against attacking and threatening abortion clinics. Didn't we already have laws against assault and harassment? How many laws do we need to cover a single act?
Have we become such a race of cowards and whiners that we need laws to protect us from phone solicitors, laws to dictate how people can talk to us, and police involved in every corner of our lives?
It seems government is being looked to as the solver of every problem. And of course, government's problem-solving tool is law. As the saying goes, to a man whose only tool is a hammer, every problem is a nail.
created 13/01/2004 - 15:15, updated 13/01/2004 - 15:18 by cybe
One of the most memorable lines from the movie, "The Patriot" was spoken by actor Mel Gibson who asked, "Why should I trade one tyrant 3,000 miles away, for 3,000 tyrants one mile away?"
The question was posed by Gibson's character during deliberations to authorize a levy in support the Colonies' war of independence against King George and his army. I often wonder who the average brain-dead, flag-waving crazy American today considers "The Enemy" to be.
Back during the build-up to the actual Revolutionary War, our Founding Fathers had no illusions whatsoever as to whom the enemy was, nor did they have any reservations in deciding what to do about them.
Back then, the enemy was King George, his troops, and the American Loyalists who considered the Crown to be the rightful American government, while individuals like James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington saw the same tyranny and oppression they left behind coming right back at them here in America.
The Founding Fathers, and all those who fought for their freedom in the Revolutionary War, didn't sit around like a bunch of cowardly Christian pansies, writing letters and protesting, while urging the masses to pray for their leaders. No, once they realized their peaceful options had been exhausted, they issued a Declaration of Independence, signed their lives and fortunes away, and started killing the King's men. They also hanged quite a few Loyalists for treason; let that be a lesson to you who presently call yourselves American Patriots.
If you place yourself in the mindset of the average American Loyalist in those early days, you would have regarded yourself as a true-blue American Crown patriot, while those who promoted revolt to secure freedom and a Republican form of government would be regarded as extremists, potential terrorists, and outright traitors.
created 12/12/2003 - 18:42, updated 13/09/2005 - 12:12
From: Roland
To All,
I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.
It is my hope, most, if not all of you, realize God is the Source/Originator of EVERYTHING. Evil has no real life so the best it can hope to do is MIMIC EVERYTHING.
We are creatures of belief (we can either believe the truth or lies] and we are fear motivated (keeping in mind there is a MIMIC to a good, healthy "fear" ["The fear of God is the BEGINNING of wisdom."].
With that said, I hope you realize you are a "soul/spiritual light being" locked inside a human/animal body. Churches tell us this but few truly understand. People mimic back/"parrot" what they have been taught.
"Lost" in our animal brain thinking, we believe the "human" body we are locked in IS life and from that place of belief we will activate the animal "survival instinct" (which is VERY powerful) when "threatened". Evil understands this and preys on that lack of understanding by "humans". Our belief (not realizing we are believing in the lie that the animal human body is life.., [TRUE life is spiritual/ETERNAL] in the lie is the foundational weakness for evil to "offer", by contract, "protection".
created 04/12/2003 - 00:06, updated 04/12/2003 - 00:10 by cybe
Widow's Bush Treason Suit Vanishes in Blink of Media Eye
by W. David Kubiak
"The decision 'not to do the story' appears to be multiplying all over
the nation." -- Fred Powledge, ACLU
"Whoever said `no news is good news,' was BADLY misinformed." --
Dan Rather
Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state of US
journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again.
Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses
the government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of the
day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally
allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War
on Terrorism" for personal and political gain.
She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania,
who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once
a strong candidate for the governor's seat.
The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including
40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials
including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft and Tenet":
1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or attempt
to prevent it;
2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;
3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated
the Constitution and multiple laws of the
United States; and
4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and
Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice
and wrongful death.
The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments
and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable
half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing
the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security
and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent
efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence
will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony
[that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead
to an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit
Defendants both financially and politically."
Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists
in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing
is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating
the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).
Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor
if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow
and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference
to which nobody came.
(Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX News appears,
tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.)
created 29/11/2003 - 03:59, updated 19/12/2004 - 03:39
Agreement Between the Settlers at New Plymouth : 1620
IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. We, whose names are underwritten, the
Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the
Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King,
Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of
God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of
our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the
northern Parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and
mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and
combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our
better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends
aforesaid: And by Virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame,
such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions, and
Officers, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and
convenient for the general Good of the Colony; unto which we
promise all due Submission and Obedience. IN WITNESS whereof we
have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape-Cod the eleventh of
November, in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of
England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland
the fifty-fourth, Anno Domini; 1620.
Mr. John Carver,
Mr. William Bradford,
Mr Edward Winslow,
Mr. William Brewster.
Isaac Allerton,
Myles Standish,
John Alden,
John Turner,
Francis Eaton,
James Chilton,
John Craxton,
John Billington,
Joses Fletcher,
John Goodman,
Mr. Samuel Fuller,
Mr. Christopher Martin,
Mr. William Mullins,
Mr. William White,
Mr. Richard Warren,
John Howland,
Mr. Steven Hopkins,
Digery Priest,
Thomas Williams,
Gilbert Winslow,
Edmund Margesson,
Peter Brown,
Richard Britteridge
George Soule,
Edward Tilly,
John Tilly,
Francis Cooke,
Thomas Rogers,
Thomas Tinker,
John Ridgdale
Edward Fuller,
Richard Clark,
Richard Gardiner,
Mr. John Allerton,
Thomas English,
Edward Doten,
Edward Liester.
Source:
The Federal and State Constitutions Colonial Charters, and Other
Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies Now or
Heretofore Forming the United States of America
Compiled and Edited Under the Act of Congress of June 30, 1906
by Francis Newton Thorpe
Washington, DC : Government Printing Office, 1909.
The ONLY Solution is to enforce The Plan:-
http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
created 08/11/2003 - 03:27, updated 08/11/2003 - 03:32 by cybe
The Supreme Court Closed The Door On Judge Moore, But God Will Open
Another One! By Chuck Baldwin November 4, 2003
Yesterday's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to not hear Alabama
Chief Justice Roy Moore's Ten Commandments case paves the way for the
total removal of America's public recognition of God. Furthermore, it
is yet another nail in the coffin of religious liberty and
constitutional governance in the United States.
created 07/10/2003 - 17:36, updated 10/09/2005 - 12:03 by cybe
To All,
Most of you in my group are aware of allodial title or "land
patents" (referred to "patients" below). The following is written by
Big Al. You may not be aware of Big Al but I can vouch for his
research. He's been at this A LOT of years.
It is true.., we are unable to own anything.., including our labor.
Your children's labor has been sold down 13 generations as we spend
further into debt every second with debt instruments we have been
dumbed-down into believing is "money". NOT!! They are IOU's to the international money changers.
We claim we are a "Christian nation" and therefore "God's Children"
BUT, we live under this system of
fraud rather than God's Laws. Most WON'T wake
up and learn because they would find out what selfish cowards they are.
I sure hope you aren't one of those.
Please see the exposé below regarding our inability to own
property. If you REALLY think you own your property.., stop paying
"their" use fees called taxes and see who comes and takes "your
property" from you. We're so DUMB we don't
know what "own" or "free" means.
There is ONLY one way out of this horror. Learn
God's Laws (The First Five Books of The Bible), reinstate them and
keep them by enforcing them. To get back to that.., there is "THE PLAN"
at i.am/jah/plan.htm It is
God's Plan. His Will will be done on earth as it is in Heaven
with or without you. If it is without you.., I am very sad for you. You
haven't "picked a side" yet if you aren't actively doing what you can
to help reinstate Father's Laws. You know that when Jesus comes back
(at least I hope you know), He is coming with a SWORD. And you are
either with Him or against Him. But I can guarantee you.., He won't be
coming to reinstate the CON-stitution or Bill of Rights. He will
reinstate Father's Laws.., so if you intend to SURVIVE what is almost upon us..,
you'd better start "boning up" on the First Five Books of The Bible and
forget all the other junk we've all been fed.
Long live The Fighters for God,
created 02/10/2003 - 18:52, updated 02/10/2003 - 18:59 by cybe
Aug 20, 2003
Martin Shipton, The Western Mail
A BARRISTER claims his application to become a judge
has been turned down because he is not a freemason.
Roger
Everest says he was told 30 years ago that he would never get on in the
legal profession after turning down an invitation to join the Dinas
Llandaff lodge of the Freemasons in Cardiff.
created 22/09/2003 - 22:02, updated 22/09/2003 - 22:16 by cybe
America is such a wonderfully free country that I thoroughly understand
why the Bush administration, like the Clinton administration before it,
is so eager to take our freedoms and spread them across the
globe.
Without the U.S government, backwards peoples will have to labor on
in their own delusions, never understanding
what true liberty is all about.
I am so free. If I want to paint my house, or build a deck out back,
or install a new air-conditioning system, I am free to call the
building inspector and get his approval first. If I want to put a new
toilet in the bathroom, I am free to buy only the low-flow toilets the government approves
I am free to buy a property near the beach, provided the government
Coastal Commission approves whatever I want to do with that property.
That approval might take decades, and the final thing that I build will
be what the commissioners want there, not what I want, but I am free
nonetheless. I know I am free because this is America. And America is a
free country - the best one in the whole darned world. If you don't
like our freedoms, you should move somewhere else.
Any other questions?
Unlike those pathetic souls in other less-free and non-free countries,
I am free to open my own business, provided I pay my employees the
minimum salary demanded by the government, and give them overtime in
the exact proportion stated by the government, and offer them breaks
that conform exactly to the standards set by government. I can operate
my business in complete freedom, provided that I meet every one of the
hundreds of pages of air-quality standards promulgated by the state and
federal governments.
created 19/09/2003 - 11:48, updated 02/01/2005 - 22:54 by cybe
To All,
I was able to hear an interview with Alfred Adesk today. If I remember correctly, Alfred used to own/run the Anti-Shyster magazine but finally had to give it up because it couldn't support itself. I subscribed back when and found some very informative articles in it.
Alfred's problem was/is.., he "sees" what is going on in America and isn't fearful to speak out. Well, it finally landed him in jail.., for 11 months. He would not "take a bond", he wouldn't "sign" anything and he wouldn't take a "public defender". The "system" did everything it could to trick/coerce/intimidate him into giving "them" jurisdiction but he never did acquiesce. "They" finally released him. Alfred said that if he knew he was going to learn as much as he did from the experience he would have paid them to put him in jail years ago.
Alfred has tested "the strawman" theory and found it is true.., "they" haven't jurisdiction over the flesh and blood body WITHOUT your written agreement. The price was nearly a year of his life to learn this truth.
(If you can "see" this.., "their system" IS the mimic to The Kingdom of Heaven.., ALL VOLUNTARY.., EXCEPT one does not try to trick you into "volunteering". Can you guess which is which?)
created 17/09/2003 - 14:49, updated 03/01/2005 - 00:10 by cybe
http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/donahue/donahue2.html
September 9, 2003
by Jim Donahue
I'd like to see some real hell unleashed in the upcoming year.
I want a briefcase full of weaponized toxins to explode in front ofthe New York Stock Exchange. I want to see political assassinationstake place all over Amerika, melee assassinations, live on televisionduring a press conference. I want power outages to roll their waythrough the countryside, from Boston to D.C. to Miami to Dallas to LosAngeles to San Francisco to Seattle and back again. I want the economyto collapse into a pile of green ashes. I want 401(k) plans and IRAsand mutual fund investments to disappear. I want the twelve FederalReserve Bank branches to go up in flames.
created 19/06/2003 - 17:20, updated 19/06/2003 - 17:28 by cybe
What these people refer to as The Law is NOT The Law at all, but man-made
unLawful legislation. The ONLY Law that is Lawful is God' Law and God's Law is
The Law and no other is The Law:-
Deuteronomy 4:2, King
of kings' s Bible Ye shall not ADD unto the word which
I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the
Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you.
JAH
WOE unto you LAWYERS & LAWYER-JUDGES!
By: Fred Rodell
(A Review & Commentary)
By: John Raker
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.
George Barnard Shaw
I first learned about a book entitled: Woe Unto You Lawyers by Fred Rodell
when I read a quotation from it in some other article I was reading. Lucky me,
I was able to find a copy of this unusual book in a used book store. It was
published in 1939.
Mr. Rodell, who was a Professor of Law at Yale University for many years, presents
a lusty, gutsy attack on what he calls THE LAW, from tribal times to the present.
He writes in his preface: No lawyer will like this book, because it was not
written for lawyers. He relates also to his realization early on of the phoniness
of the whole legal-process.
It is the lawyers who run our civilization for us--- he says. All the judges
(a judge is a lawyer who knew a governor, the author relates) are lawyers; they
interpret and enforce our laws, he continues. There is no separation of powers
where the lawyers are concerned..... only a concentration of all governmental
power --- in the lawyers.
As explained by the Devil in the film "Devil's Advocate" - JAH.
All around us in our daily lives, the author explains, that lawyers guide us
through a maze of confusing gestures and formalities that the lawyers have created.
But the amazing thing about all this is, THE LAW is carried on in a foreign
language..... the law deals almost exclusively with the ordinary facts and occurrences
of everyday business.... But it deals with them in a Jargon which completely
baffles and befoozles the ordinary literate man....
Purposely - JAH.
created 19/06/2003 - 16:32, updated 19/06/2003 - 16:40 by cybe
To be GOVERNED (by anyone except God) is to be watched, inspected, spied upon,
directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at,
controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who
have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.
created 01/06/2003 - 20:07, updated 01/06/2003 - 20:08 by cybe
This article from the Jerusalem Post is evidence of the growing Talmudic influence over the US Federal government and its judiciary. The supposition is that the "National Institute for Judaic Law" will be grounded in Old Testament law, when in fact the religion of Judaism nullifies Old Testament law by filtering it through the distorting prism of the Talmud. There is even a reference to the Talmud in paragraph seven of the Jerusalem Post article.
created 28/05/2003 - 11:59, updated 28/05/2003 - 12:00 by cybe
Sarah Medhurst (nee Black) shocked journalists and legal scholars at a press conference held at the Black family estate Monday when she revealed that Black's Law Dictionary, a highly regarded legal reference text, was originally written as a joke by her eccentric great grandfather Henry Campbell Black.
|