World Trade Center 911
- 9/11 - The Basic Questions - Questions for Michael Moore "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a powerful antiwar statement and needs to be supported for that reason. However, I would like to ask Michael Moore a few questions regarding his implication that Saudi Arabia was behind 9-11. - The Part of the Story Michael Moore Missed Let's take a look at the idea of Saudi Arabia as the perpetrator of 9-11. Why would they do it? What would they gain? and much more...
Let me start by saying that I have not seen Fahrenheit 9/11 yet, other than the trailer available online. And since Mr. Moore has not contacted me directly (not counting a nice email from one of his publicity people), I cannot speak to the film's contents....
created 07/06/2004 - 16:25, updated 07/06/2004 - 18:44
A Parable For
Imagine a hypothetical situation where a team of vicious thieves plots an exceptionally violent bank robbery in the downtown financial district of a major city. Numerous anomalies are noticed during the commission of this crime.
created 22/05/2004 - 00:00, updated 31/05/2004 - 14:43 by cybe
New York Post
created 14/04/2004 - 22:06, updated 05/06/2004 - 19:39 by cybe
APRIL 13, 2004.
Judging by my email traffic and my surfing of alt. news sites, the current 9/11 cover stories are having an effect. I'm seeing fewer mentions of the evidence that 9/11 was an event FAR DIFFERENT from the one the official scenario portrays.
Well, this is what a cover story is FOR.
These days, it's all about whether a "well-intentioned" White House made "mistakes" in not paying closer attention to warnings about Al Qaida ops inside the US.
created 13/04/2004 - 23:54, updated 14/04/2004 - 00:02 by cybe
A cruel sham is being perpetrated on the American public and especially
on the families of the victims of the September 11,
attacks on the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. One of
expectations of the public is that the Commission established to
investigate the attacks will find out what the government (in
particular intelligence agencies) knew prior to the attacks. However,
both the restrictions on the Commission and the composition of its
members are designed to prevent just that.
created 13/04/2004 - 23:26, updated 31/05/2004 - 14:35 by cybe
April 08, 2004
Few people realize the role in our government that the Council on Foreign Relations plays. This secret organization has over 4000 members who have infiltrated almost all important organizations in our country at the highest levels. For instance, 3 Supreme Court justices are CFR. The reason so little is known about CFR is that many key members of the media are members of this secret organization. They can't tell !
Click here to read Myron Fagan's excellent article on The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) ]
The late Admiral Chester Ward, who resigned from the CFR in disgust after being a member for 16 years, was not exaggerating when he charged that the group's agenda is to promote "disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." The leadership of the group, he said, "is composed of the one-world-global-government ideologists - more respectfully referred to as the organized internationalists."
Admiral Ward's harsh assessment is more than justified.
The CFR has cut a sordid path through American history. But its dreadful record has not stopped it from gaining unprecedented power and influence. Author/journalist Richard Rovere (CFR) has aptly described the Council as "a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation." It controls both major parties and has had a virtual lock-hold on the executive branch of the federal government since World War II.
In his 1979 memoir, With No Apologies, Senator Barry Goldwater noted: "When a new President comes on board, there is a great turnover in personnel but no change in policy. Example: During the Nixon years Henry Kissinger, CFR member and Nelson Rockefeller's protégé, was in charge of foreign policy. When Jimmy Carter was elected, Kissinger was replaced by Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member and David Rockefeller's protégé."
That pattern has continued. The Clinton administration was loaded with over 400 CFR members; the Bush team, it appears will match that. Top Bush picks such as Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Rice, Zoellick, and Chao are all Pratt House veterans. One of the first persons Colin Powell officially received as Secretary of State was Frank Carlucci, who recently chaired the CFR's panel on restructuring the State Department. The party labels may have changed, but don't expect a substantive change in policies.
Bush & the Council for Revolution by William Jasper (The New American - Mar 12, 2001)
It is no surprise that the 911 Commission is loaded with CFR members:
created 09/04/2004 - 09:41, updated 01/08/2004 - 12:40 by cybe
CNN – press conference
A reporter asks about Dean's comments that Bush had foreknowledge of 9-11, observe the strange reaction by puppet-Bush.
Looks like he hasn't briefed by his spin-doctors and has no clue whatsoever what to answer.
Source - The Dossier
Alternative download link
Näillä sivuilla pyrin esittelemään kriittisen tutkimuksen ja journalismin tuloksia siitä mitä tapahtui Yhdysvalloissa 11.9.2001 Maailmaa järkyttänyttä terrori-iskua eivät toteuttaneet arabit. Suurin osa siitä, mitä meille on kerrottu tuon päivän tapahtumista on valhetta. Ihmisiä hallitaan pelon avulla. Meidän ei ole pakko alistua manipuloitaviksi. Rikokset tulee paljastaa, tapahtuivat ne sitten missä ilmansuunnassa tahansa.
created 08/12/2003 - 18:21, updated 29/08/2006 - 08:52
"My father's no different than any other powerful man. Like a senator or president."
"You know how naïve you sound? Senators and presidents don't have men killed".
"Oh. Who's being naïve, Kay?"—Michael Corleone in "The Godfather".
December 6, 2003—Suppose you were a detective assigned to investigate a rather brutal murder, one in which the victim had been tortured for several days prior to being killed.
At the scene of the crime you get what appears to be a lucky break—the suspect's wallet seems to have been 'carelessly' dropped. It contains his name, address, and phone number, and is someone you recognize as having connections to an organized crime family.
Problem is, you also find your name and address in there, as well as those of your children, grandchildren, and all of your nieces and nephews.
The message is quite clear, and your priorities dictate. You pocket the wallet, and any other evidence you happen upon, and the crime goes unsolved.
Now suppose you were a congressman assigned to investigate the 911 terrorist attacks. As you begin, it becomes apparent that certain members of the US government had conspired to allow the attacks to occur. In fact, it's just lying there, slightly below the surface, right out in the open. You immediately realize you're dealing with the kind of people who would—at the very least, and simply to further a political agenda—look the other way while 3,000 civilians were murdered.
And if that wasn't troubling enough, you then get a 'friendly' visit from someone you've never met before, inquiring into how well your daughter is doing at that overseas university in Dorm Room 305, and if your nephew made it into that prestigious preschool at 735 S. 4th Street in Atlanta.
You might even get a little note in the mail—laced with a powdery substance—just to help you sort things out in your head.
The message is quite clear, and your priorities dictate. When the "investigation" is complete, no governmental complicity in the crime is revealed.
created 04/12/2003 - 00:06, updated 04/12/2003 - 00:10 by cybe
Widow's Bush Treason Suit Vanishes in Blink of Media Eye
"The decision 'not to do the story' appears to be multiplying all over the nation." -- Fred Powledge, ACLU
"Whoever said `no news is good news,' was BADLY misinformed." -- Dan Rather
Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state of US journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again.
Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on Terrorism" for personal and political gain.
She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat.
The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft and Tenet":
The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony [that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead to an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and politically."
Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).
Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference to which nobody came.
(Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX News appears, tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.)
"...Less than an hour before the WTC attacks Donald Rumsfeld told a congressional delegation that a "shocking" event would occur soon..."
created 22/09/2003 - 21:20, updated 22/09/2003 - 21:48 by cybe
There is no doubt that those in Washington are war criminals, but we can't have them arrested. The global military and police state apparatus that the Republican fascists have solidified makes them invulnerable to prosecution. All we can do is unite and vote these Gingrich clone human cockroach Republican human pigs out of office, once and for all. Maybe then we can start to heal the wounds that the Republican agenda has caused. -Willie Martin
You cannot VOTE them out of office because the two parties are the two wings of the same bird of prey.
The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan
By John Kaminski
skylax [at] comcast [dot] net
On September 11, 2001, the most infamous day in American history, the tallest buildings in New York were not knocked down by airplanes hijacked by Arabs, they were destroyed by demolition charges.
This is no longer wild conspiracy theory, it is a series of provable facts, deftly presented on a website that every American should not only read but possibly memorize, so they can repeat it verbatim to every law enforcement officer in the country. The web site is located here.
Briefly synopsized, the site outlines a terrifying proposition: if the collapse of the Twin Towers were caused by demolition, the entire official story about that sad day collapses like the house of evil cards so many Americans and people around the world already suspect it is.
The site, WTC7.net, backs up its conclusions with a devastating play-by-play of what actually happened on 9/11, and what could not possibly have happened according to universally accepted engineering principles.
The official story collapses under scrutiny, the site insists. It lists five stunning assertions:
1. Fires have never destroyed steel buildings.
2. The collapses were not investigated.
3. The physical evidence was destroyed.
4. The official explanations are ludicrous.
5. The evidence indicates demolition.
6. Demolition is provable.
created 21/09/2003 - 23:00, updated 08/08/2006 - 23:00 by cybe
The mainstream media is whitewashing and lying about what really happened on sept. 11. 911 The Road To Tyranny is shaking the foundations of Washinton DC as the most comprehensive and revealing documentary film covering what really happened on sept 11. and who stands to gain.
created 05/07/2003 - 21:41, updated 02/01/2005 - 23:07 by cybe
By Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D
I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute
We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate
- President Bush Speaks to United
- New World Order
- Agencies, Commissions...
- The UN
- Jewry, "Israel", Zionism...
- The Middle East
- Secret Societies
* Skull and Bones
- The Vatican
- The USA
- The EU
- Fake Terror
- London 7/7
- Archaeology & History
- The Ark of The Covenant
- Disarmament of the people
- Genetically Modified...
- God's Law/Torah
- Manmade Law
- Audio & Video
- Money, Banking, The Fed, IMF
- Science & Technology
- Energy, Oil...
- HIV / AIDS
- Finland / Suomi
- Quote Collection