Evidence of video image manipulation in "live" news reports on 9/11
If you've ever looked at the "live video" of the suppposed plane strikes on 9/11 and thought they looked off, these videos demonstrate why.
Documented evidence of video image manipulation as well staged "eye witnesss" testimony. [Description from Brasscheck TV]
Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 5:25 AM
AUTHOR’S STATEMENT :
(please read this before commenting on september Clues, thanks for your time)
This statement is meant to clarify a series of issues and points which I find important to make, given the incredible response SC has had in only a month – a vast majority of positive feedbacks but also some odd and frankly gratuitious comments on a few websites – even on some I used to respect.
My motivations are to find solely in my personal quest for justice in the light of more... the most horrid and murderous hoax of modern times. My longstanding research (helped on by every single component of the wide 911 truth movement) reached its decisive turning point when I was able to analyze the footage/audio of the televisions’ broadcasts of that fateful day. I have double-checked every media (i.e.footage) that has come under my scrutiny and confronted it scrupulously with official television archives and other verifiable sources. Now, if anyone still questions the authenticity of this media, I will gladly help financing a FOIA act to retrieve the original, high-definition footage from the various tv networks.
I initially hesitated to publish this work on the www – if only for the sheer difficulty of displaying by means of low resolution video some of the more subtle details in this study. For instance, the pixel-count of the ‘nose-in/nose-out’ on Fox Tv (see SC part1) may be unconvincing on video but is formidably precise in full format / high-resolution graphics. So, anyone wishing to prove the nose-out is a different ‘object’ than the nose-in, has a formidable task on his hands.
Furthermore, I have reviewed all (over 20) of the existing shots of the 2nd plane hit including the Naudet brothers' footage (1st and 2nd hit). There are tell-tale signs of forgery in every single one of them. I'm putting my twenty years+ of experience in the audio/video field at stake by ruling out beyond any reasonable doubt that the planes seen on tv (and on 'amateur' footage) were real.
What does this mean for the honest, 911 truthseekers (all of them) ? It simply means having solid, tangible proof of foul play – something which has not been available for almost six years. This study does NOT invalidate the hard work of the many 911 truthseekers - let this be very clear. This is just the last - and most factual - piece of a frustrating puzzle which has taken too long to assemble.
I will gracefully listen to anyone's objections and suggestions - but I'll ask fellow truthseekers to cut the disinfo accusations. I understand the shock this is for many : to realize the extent of human evil and deceit is never a painless process.
Sunday, June 10, 2007 at 3:04 PM
Important note : having seen some comments on 'famous' sites linking this research to various organizations, I want to stress that :
I am not linked to any special interests, to anyone whatsoever. I'm a LONE researcher am not affiliated to organizations of any kind. Of course, I have a few very smart friends out there which have helped me through - you know who you are, I love you all.
Also, if anyone questions the authenticity of the TV footage used for this research - go to the more... 911 Chronology Sources Television Archive it's there for all to see :
BUT BE WARNED : the entire FOX5 helicopter-shot has been edited out and replaced with planeless shot (only fireball) similar to CBS's - while commentary has remained unaltered....
Friday, June 8, 2007 at 2:11 PM
Thanks to everyone who leave a comment here.
I deeply appreciate every single opinion on this painstaking research.