Commentary from Danny

 

Thank-you for your reply Staffan.

When the subject is video-fakery, it's always going to be difficult to ascertain who is telling the truth. You'd need all the original footage to check against etc etc, correct? But it does make some very good points yes.

If you put yourself in the shoes of the plotters, as they were finalizing the 9-11 plot, is it not plausible that for the last bastion of deceit, as the final "firewall" of protection to prevent the truth from being accepted by ordinary folk... they decided to carry out the attack on the towers in such a manner that were the truth about how they did it, discovered, no-one (very few) would believe it?

They made sure we all "saw" the planes going into the towers. Over and over and over. Perhaps there was another reason for this, besides the "shock and awe" motive. To make sure any truth-seekers who stumbled upon the truth (missiles?) would have a tremendously hard job of convincing others this was how they did it. They would know, that honest truth-seekers, once these knew it was missiles (if indeed that was the case), would not continue to promote the lie that it was planes. And in so doing, the truth would work against them (or so they would believe).

Because, of course, "everyone" saw the planes crashing into the towers.

To me, that's how these people would think. Whether they actually did this or not, I do not know. But that docu sure is food for thought.

Remaining open-minded about this,

LLTF,

Danny.

 

 

 

My reply to Danny:

 

Or you'd need to be there on the place.

You theory below [above, about the reason] sounds interesting. I wouldn't wonder if they by now have precise statistics and computer programs on how humans react and how to best manipulate people.

Perhaps the main reason to use a missile instead of a plane was that the plane would practically just crumple against the tower sand most of it would hang/fall out on the other side and not cause the desired huge fireball explosion that would give the viewer the impression that this then caused the collapses.

The list of witnesses, most being MSM people is also very suspect. If they are lying then I wonder what freemasonic-like oaths they've taken.

BTW, since the commenting is working quite well on 100777.com I could do something to enliven it even more, perhaps have a few regulars giving insights and help with moderation.

CNN Fake Footage Blasted: More Proof for the Hard Headed

"If only there were some way to know what the view in the park actually looked like on September 11, more... 2001. Were there trees planted there? Were there lampposts? If only we knew, then we would finally have proof.">

 

"September 11, 1990: President Bush reveals a plan to destroy America and establish a one-world government. He calls it "a big idea, a New World Order".

The Octopus is too weak to carry out his vision in 1990 because the news media are not under total control. The Octopus spend the next ten years planning a "New Pearl Harbor" event that will terrorize the American Public into abandoning their Bill of Rights and join a Global Fascist Police State where cruel and unusual torture is common and resistance is met with secret detention, mind-altering drugs, and execution.

The Octopus plans to enforce their scheme through the use of little-understood high-tech weaponry and intensive propaganda spread through the news media.

With their tentacles carefully placed in strategic positions within the FBI, the Justice Dept, and the Military, the Octopus decides to attack at the Dawn of a New Millenium, exactly 11 years after their plan was announced by the elder President Bush.

Using an imaginary threat of global "Islamic Terrorism" the Octopus enlists the Neo-cons, Zionists, and Right-Wing Christians to spread their propaganda, making empty promises to each group. Little do they realize that as soon as the Octopus takes total control, Israel and the Religious will be betrayed, and all of mankind will serve only one master: The Octopus.

Loose Change and Terrorstorm helped open your eyes, now see through the lies of the mainstream media and understand clearly what is happening.

This movie has nothing to do with Jessica Simpson, Paris Hilton, or Britney Spears Drunk. But it's still entertaining, new, interesting, and fun. Disturbing not sexy. No webcam girls in this one. Please wake up your friends."

This one is from this page at 911tvfakery.blogspot.com/

Here is that first event only in a short 7 sec clip.

 

I quickly made an animated GIF out of the first layerdrift featured in the above clip. I've used 11 frames from the clip and stabilized the camera motion + added a slight orange overlay on the houses. Quite a layer shift there!, poorly disguised by something like "noise", "pixelisation"or "loss of digital signal". I havn't yet looked carefully at the other clips featured in the clip above.

UPDATE 1 : I colored the other building orange too and improved the clip slightly. Someone should do a high quality exposé like this of the original footage...

If Czech hackers faked the video below, what do you think more powerful organizations can fake?

http://www.realinsidenews.com/911trutharticle010.html

Just came across this article, but it's not very impressive to look at, and compare highly compressed youtube clips.

Still hoping to download and look through 40+ gigabytes of 911 footage from the conspiracy tracker:

http://conspiracycentral.net:6969/index.html?search=archive.org&top_subm...

I'm all about the validity of some conspiracy theories surrounding 911, but people have to be careful not to go to such ridiculous extremes, thereby threatening the legitimate validity of conspiracy claims that might be correct. Remember, the biggest conspiracy/cover up may be the simplest: that the government was caught with their pants down and created a self-perpetuating web of lies to save their asses